The Experts below are selected from a list of 945 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Eugene F. Huget - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Effects of cements and eugenol on properties of a visible light-cured composite.
Pediatric dentistry, 1993Co-Authors: Tammy L. Powell, Eugene F. HugetAbstract:An in vitro study evaluated the effects of barrier materials on mechanical properties of a visible light-cured composite restorative. The composite was cured and aged over a widely used Cavity Liner (Dycal®), various cements (Fleck’s, Durelon, Vitrabond, ZOE B & T) and free eugenol and tested at seven and 28 days. The properties of interest were tensile stress (strength) at rupture, compressive strain (deformation at rupture), and stress-strain ratio at rupture. The experiment indicated that underlying barrier materials exerted neither a beneficial nor an adverse effect upon the restorative’s ability to withstand compressive strain and tensile stress (P < 0.05). (Pediatr Dent 15:104-7, 1993)
Carlos Albero De Souza Costa - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Compatibilidade biologica de resina resorcina-formaldeido quando aplicada sobre dentina em pre-molares humanos. Avaliação em microscopia optica e eletronica de transmissão
2017Co-Authors: Carlos Albero De Souza CostaAbstract:Resumo: o objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar a compatibilidade biológica da resina resorcina-formaldeído quando aplicada diretamente sobre dentina. Trinta e seis premolares humanos íntegros, indicados para extração por motivos ortodônticos, foram divididos em três grupos: no grupo experimental, 22 cavidades classe V foram preparadas e forradas com a resina resorcina formaldeído; no grupo controle I, 8 cavidades foram forradas com cimento de hidróxido de cálcio. As cavidades destes dois grupos foram restauradas com amálgama. No grupo controle 11, 6 premolares foram mantidos íntegros. Osdentes foram extraídos após 7, 15, 30 e 120 dias da realização das restaurações e cortes histológicos foram preparados para avaliação em M.E.T.. Outros ainda, com 6 Ilm de espessura, foram corados com hematoxilina e eosina, tricrômico de Masson e pela técnica de Brown e Brenn para evidenciar bactérias. No grupo experimental, aos 7 dias, observou-se desarranjo da camada odontoblástica, aspiração de corpos celulares para o interior dos túbulos dentinários, degeneração hidrópica das células, hialinização do interstício, necrose e neutrófilos. Aos 15 e 30 dias, a intensidade das alterações pulpares diminuiu. Aos120 dias, houve reparação pulpar, com deposição de dentina reacional. No grupo controle I, houve discreta alteração pulpar aos 7 dias, porém nos demais períodos o tecido pulpar exibia características normais, semelhante aos dentes não tratados do grupo controle 11. Não houve relação entre a irjfnsidade da reação pulpar com a espessura de dentina remanescente, nem com a presença de bactérias coradas nas paredes cavitárias ou no interior dos túbulos dentinários. A resina resorcina-formaldeído, usada como forrador cavitário, causou significante reação pulpar aos 7 e 15 dias. Novas pesquisas "in vivo" e"in vitro" devem ser realizadas para que seja avaliada a biocompatibilidade da resina quando aplicada. sobre variados substratos dentinários, permitindo determinar outras possíveis indicações de uso deste produto em testeAbstract: The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the biological compatibility of a resorcin-formaldehyde resin when applied directly on dentin Cavity floor. Thirty six healthy human premolars due to be extracted for orthodontic reasons were selected for the study. This sample was divided into three groups: in experimental group, class V cavities were prepared, lined with resorcin formaldehyde resin; in control group I, the cavities were lined with calcium hydroxide cements. The cavities were restored with amalgam; in control group 11, the remaining 6 prelomars were used as a negative control, having no treatment. The teeth were extracted at 7, 15, 30 and 120 days afier the placement of restorations and sections were obtained, stained with haematoxylin and eosin, Masson's Trichrome, with the Brown and Brenn technique for the identification of bacteria. The specimens were evaluated in O.M. and T.E.M. and histological observations showed at 7 day for experimental group, odontoblastic disappearance with aspiration into dentinal tubules, hidropic degeneration cells, hyalin alteration, necrosis and neutrophils in the region. At 15 and 30 days was" determined that the intensity of the reactions decreased with time, so at 120 days was observed the pulpal healing with reactional dentinal deposition. For the control group I the histological observation showed slight pulpal reaction at 7 days but in the others periods the pulpal tissue exibed normal characteristics, similar the teeth no treated for control group 11. This study showed neither a potential relationship between the intensity of the reactions and the thickness of the residual dentin nor between the intensity of reactions and the presence of bacteria on the Cavity walls or into the dentinal tubules. The resorcin-formaldehyde resin, used as Cavity Liner, showed a significant pulpal reaction at 7 and 15 days. So, more "in vivo" and "in vitro" studies should be made to observe pulp reactions when resin is applied on enamel or cemen
Costa, Carlos Alberto De Souza - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Compatibilidade biologica de resina resorcina-formaldeido quando aplicada sobre dentina em pre-molares humanos. Avaliação em microscopia optica e eletronica de transmissão
[s.n.], 2018Co-Authors: Costa, Carlos Alberto De SouzaAbstract:Orientador: Jose MerzelTese (doutorado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Faculdade de Odontologia de PiracicabaResumo: o objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar a compatibilidade biológica da resina resorcina-formaldeído quando aplicada diretamente sobre dentina. Trinta e seis premolares humanos íntegros, indicados para extração por motivos ortodônticos, foram divididos em três grupos: no grupo experimental, 22 cavidades classe V foram preparadas e forradas com a resina resorcina formaldeído; no grupo controle I, 8 cavidades foram forradas com cimento de hidróxido de cálcio. As cavidades destes dois grupos foram restauradas com amálgama. No grupo controle 11, 6 premolares foram mantidos íntegros. Os dentes foram extraídos após 7, 15, 30 e 120 dias da realização das restaurações e cortes histológicos foram preparados para avaliação em M.E.T.. Outros ainda, com 6 Ilm de espessura, foram corados com hematoxilina e eosina, tricrômico de Masson e pela técnica de Brown e Brenn para evidenciar bactérias. No grupo experimental, aos 7 dias, observou-se desarranjo da camada odontoblástica, aspiração de corpos celulares para o interior dos túbulos dentinários, degeneração hidrópica das células, hialinização do interstício, necrose e neutrófilos. Aos 15 e 30 dias, a intensidade das alterações pulpares diminuiu. Aos 120 dias, houve reparação pulpar, com deposição de dentina reacional. No grupo controle I, houve discreta alteração pulpar aos 7 dias, porém nos demais períodos o tecido pulpar exibia características normais, semelhante aos dentes não tratados do grupo controle 11. Não houve relação entre a irjfnsidade da reação pulpar com a espessura de dentina remanescente, nem com a presença de bactérias coradas nas paredes cavitárias ou no interior dos túbulos dentinários. A resina resorcina-formaldeído, usada como forrador cavitário, causou significante reação pulpar aos 7 e 15 dias. Novas pesquisas "in vivo" e "in vitro" devem ser realizadas para que seja avaliada a biocompatibilidade da resina quando aplicada. sobre variados substratos dentinários, permitindo determinar outras possíveis indicações de uso deste produto em testeAbstract: The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the biological compatibility of a resorcin-formaldehyde resin when applied directly on dentin Cavity floor. Thirty six healthy human premolars due to be extracted for orthodontic reasons were selected for the study. This sample was divided into three groups: in experimental group, class V cavities were prepared, lined with resorcin formaldehyde resin; in control group I, the cavities were lined with calcium hydroxide cements. The cavities were restored with amalgam; in control group 11, the remaining 6 prelomars were used as a negative control, having no treatment. The teeth were extracted at 7, 15, 30 and 120 days afier the placement of restorations and sections were obtained, stained with haematoxylin and eosin, Masson's Trichrome, with the Brown and Brenn technique for the identification of bacteria. The specimens were evaluated in O.M. and T.E.M. and histological observations showed at 7 day for experimental group, odontoblastic disappearance with aspiration into dentinal tubules, hidropic degeneration cells, hyalin alteration, necrosis and neutrophils in the region. At 15 and 30 days was" determined that the intensity of the reactions decreased with time, so at 120 days was observed the pulpal healing with reactional dentinal deposition. For the control group I the histological observation showed slight pulpal reaction at 7 days but in the others periods the pulpal tissue exibed normal characteristics, similar the teeth no treated for control group 11. This study showed neither a potential relationship between the intensity of the reactions and the thickness of the residual dentin nor between the intensity of reactions and the presence of bacteria on the Cavity walls or into the dentinal tubules. The resorcin-formaldehyde resin, used as Cavity Liner, showed a significant pulpal reaction at 7 and 15 days. So, more "in vivo" and "in vitro" studies should be made to observe pulp reactions when resin is applied on enamel or cementDoutoradoBiologia e Patologia Buco-DentalDoutor em Ciência
Gregory P Mathieu - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Dentin adhesive superior to copal varnish in preventing microleakage in primary teeth.
Pediatric dentistry, 1996Co-Authors: Michael C. Royse, Norman W. Ott, Gregory P MathieuAbstract:Microleakage presents a major challenge to the success of all restorations placed in the oral Cavity, resulting in postoperative sensitivity, pulpal irritation, and secondary caries formation. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of an adhesive Cavity Liner under amalgam restorations in primary teeth. Sixty class V amalgam restorations were placed on the buccal and~or lingual surfaces of 38 primary molars and canine teeth. A dentin adhesive Cavity Liner was placed under 20 of the amalgam restorations. Another 20 restorations were lined with copal Cavity varnish prior to amalgam condensation. The remaining 20 had no Liner. All teeth were thermocycled in 0.5% basic fuschin dye, sectioned, and examined under a stereomicroscope to evaluate microleakage. While all specimens demonstrated leakage around the margins of the restorations, only the teeth with adhesive resin Liners prevented leakage into the dentinal walls of the restoration. The copal Cavity varnish group displayed microleakage approaching the pulpal chamber, whereas the unlined specimens consistently displayed dye penetration into the pulp chamber. At P < 0.01, the use of an adhesive Cavity Liner under amalgam restorations in primary teeth resulted in significantly less microleakage. (Pediatr Dent 18:440-43, 1996)
Analia Veitz-keenan - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Dental Cavity Liners for Class I and Class II resin-based composite restorations.
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2019Co-Authors: Andrew B. Schenkel, Analia Veitz-keenanAbstract:Resin-based composite (RBC) is currently accepted as a viable material for the restoration of caries for posterior permanent teeth requiring surgical treatment. Despite the fact that the thermal conductivity of the RBC restorative material closely approximates that of natural tooth structure, postoperative hypersensitivity is sometimes still an issue. Dental Cavity Liners have historically been used to protect the pulp from the toxic effects of some dental restorative materials and to prevent the pain of thermal conductivity by placing an insulating layer between restorative material and the remaining tooth structure. This is an update of the Cochrane Review first published in 2016. The objective of this review was to assess the effects of using dental Cavity Liners in the placement of Class I and Class II resin-based composite posterior restorations in permanent teeth in children and adults. Cochrane Oral Health's Information Specialist searched the following databases: Cochrane Oral Health's Trials Register (to 12 November 2018), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2018, Issue 10) in the Cochrane Library (searched 12 November 2018), MEDLINE Ovid (1946 to 12 November 2018), Embase Ovid (1980 to 12 November 2018) and LILACS BIREME Virtual Health Library (Latin American and Caribbean Health Science Information database; 1982 to 12 November 2018). We searched ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform for ongoing trials. No restrictions were placed on the language or date of publication when searching the electronic databases. We included randomized controlled trials assessing the effects of the use of Liners under Class I and Class II posterior resin-based composite restorations in permanent teeth (in both adults and children). We included both parallel and split-mouth designs. We utilized standard methodological procedures prescribed by Cochrane for data collection and analysis. Two review authors screened the search results and assessed the eligibility of studies for inclusion against the review inclusion criteria. We conducted risk of bias assessments and data extraction independently and in duplicate. Where information was unclear we contacted study authors for clarification. Eight studies, recruiting over 700 participants, compared the use of dental Cavity Liners to no Liners for Class I and Class II resin-based composite restorations.Seven studies evaluated postoperative hypersensitivity measured by various methods. All studies were at unclear or high risk of bias. There was inconsistent evidence regarding postoperative hypersensitivity (either measured using cold response or patient-reported), with a benefit shown at some, but not all, time points (low-quality evidence).Four trials measured restoration longevity. Two of the studies were judged to be at high risk and two at unclear risk of bias. No difference in restoration failure rates were shown at 1 year follow-up, with no failures reported in either group for three of the four studies; the fourth study had a risk ratio (RR) 1.00 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.07 to 15.00) (low-quality evidence). Three studies evaluated restoration longevity at 2 years follow-up and, again, no failures were shown in either group.No adverse events were reported in any of the included studies. There is inconsistent, low-quality evidence regarding the difference in postoperative hypersensitivity subsequent to placing a dental Cavity Liner under Class I and Class II posterior resin-based composite restorations in permanent posterior teeth in adults or children 15 years or older. Furthermore, no evidence was found to demonstrate a difference in the longevity of restorations placed with or without dental Cavity Liners.
-
The Cochrane Library - Dental Cavity Liners for Class I and Class II resin-based composite restorations
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2016Co-Authors: Andrew B. Schenkel, Ivy D. Peltz, Analia Veitz-keenanAbstract:Background Resin-based composite (RBC) is currently accepted as a viable material for the restoration of caries for posterior permanent teeth requiring surgical treatment. Despite the fact that the thermal conductivity of the RBC restorative material closely approximates that of natural tooth structure, postoperative hypersensitivity is sometimes still an issue. Dental Cavity Liners have historically been used to protect the pulp from the toxic effects of some dental restorative materials and to prevent the pain of thermal conductivity by placing an insulating layer between restorative material and the remaining tooth structure. Objectives The objective of this review was to assess the effects of using dental Cavity Liners in the placement of Class I and Class II resin-based composite posterior restorations in permanent teeth in children and adults. Search methods Cochrane Oral Health's Information Specialist searched the following databases: Cochrane Oral Health's Trials Register (to 25 May 2016), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2016, Issue 4) in the Cochrane Library (searched 25 May 2016), MEDLINE Ovid (1946 to 25 May 2016), Embase Ovid (1980 to 25 May 2016) and LILACS BIREME Virtual Health Library (Latin American and Caribbean Health Science Information database; 1982 to 25 May 2016). We searched ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform for ongoing trials. No restrictions were placed on the language or date of publication when searching the electronic databases. Selection criteria We included randomized controlled trials assessing the effects of the use of Liners under Class I and Class II posterior resin-based composite restorations in permanent teeth (in both adults and children). We included both parallel and split-mouth designs. Data collection and analysis We utilized standard methodological procedures prescribed by Cochrane for data collection and analysis. Two review authors screened the search results and assessed the eligibility of studies for inclusion against the review inclusion criteria. We conducted risk of bias assessments and data extraction independently and in duplicate. Where information was unclear we contacted study authors for clarification. Main results Eight studies, recruiting over 700 participants, compared the use of dental Cavity Liners to no Liners for Class I and Class II resin-based composite restorations. Seven studies evaluated postoperative hypersensitivity measured by various methods. All studies were at unclear or high risk of bias. There was inconsistent evidence regarding postoperative hypersensitivity (either measured using cold response or patient-reported), with a benefit shown at some, but not all, time points (low-quality evidence). Four trials measured restoration longevity. Two of the studies were judged to be at high risk and two at unclear risk of bias. No difference in restoration failure rates were shown at one year follow-up, with no failures reported in either group for three of the four studies; the fourth study had a risk ratio (RR) 1.00 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.07 to 15.00) (low-quality evidence). Three studies evaluated restoration longevity at two years follow-up and, again, no failures were shown in either group. No adverse events were reported in any of the included studies. Authors' conclusions There is inconsistent, low-quality evidence regarding the difference in postoperative hypersensitivity subsequent to placing a dental Cavity Liner under Class I and Class II posterior resin-based composite restorations in permanent posterior teeth in adults or children 15 years or older. Furthermore, no evidence was found to demonstrate a difference in the longevity of restorations placed with or without dental Cavity Liners.