The Experts below are selected from a list of 237 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Roberto B M Marano - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
a global multinational survey of cefotaxime resistant Coliforms in urban wastewater treatment plants
Environment International, 2020Co-Authors: Roberto B M Marano, Telma Fernandes, Celia M Manaia, Olga C Nunes, Donald Morrison, Thomas U Berendonk, Norbert Kreuzinger, Tanel Telson, Gianluca CornoAbstract:The World Health Organization Global Action Plan recommends integrated surveillance programs as crucial strategies for monitoring antibiotic resistance. Although several national surveillance programs are in place for clinical and veterinary settings, no such schemes exist for monitoring antibiotic-resistant bacteria in the environment. In this transnational study, we developed, validated, and tested a low-cost surveillance and easy to implement approach to evaluate antibiotic resistance in wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) by targeting cefotaxime-resistant (CTX-R) Coliforms as indicators. The rationale for this approach was: i) coliform quantification methods are internationally accepted as indicators of fecal contamination in recreational waters and are therefore routinely applied in analytical labs; ii) CTX-R Coliforms are clinically relevant, associated with extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs), and are rare in pristine environments. We analyzed 57 WWTPs in 22 countries across Europe, Asia, Africa, Australia, and North America. CTX-R Coliforms were ubiquitous in raw sewage and their relative abundance varied significantly (<0.1% to 38.3%), being positively correlated (p < 0.001) with regional atmospheric temperatures. Although most WWTPs removed large proportions of CTX-R Coliforms, loads over 103 colony-forming units per mL were occasionally observed in final effluents. We demonstrate that CTX-R coliform monitoring is a feasible and affordable approach to assess wastewater antibiotic resistance status.
Marti Wiedma - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
short communication coliform petrifilm as an alternative method for detecting total gram negative bacteria in fluid milk
Journal of Dairy Science, 2020Co-Authors: A Rojas, Marti Wiedma, S I Murphy, N H MartiAbstract:Postpasteurization contamination (PPC) of fluid milk remains a challenge for some dairy processors. Pseudomonas is the most common contaminant of fluid milk after pasteurization, and therefore methods to detect PPC should be inclusive of Pseudomonas and other gram-negative contaminants (e.g., coliform bacteria). Our objective was to compare the ability of 3M (St. Paul, MN) coliform and Enterobacteriaceae (EB) Petrifilm to detect total gram-negative bacteria with that of the standard method, crystal violet tetrazolium agar. To that end, we evaluated coliform Petrifilm, EB Petrifilm, and crystal violet tetrazolium agar to detect gram-negative bacteria in naturally contaminated samples of fluid milk. A total of 92 observations derived from shelf-life testing of 33 milk samples from 5 different processing facilities were evaluated for (1) presence of Coliforms on coliform Petrifilm at both 24 and 48 h of incubation; (2) presence of any growth, regardless of gas production, on coliform Petrifilm at both 24 and 48 h of incubation; (3) presence of EB on EB Petrifilm at both 24 and 48 h of incubation; (4) presence of any growth, regardless of gas or acid production, on EB Petrifilm at both 24 and 48 h of incubation; and (5) presence of gram-negative bacteria on crystal violet tetrazolium agar after 48 h of incubation. Sensitivity and specificity analysis of results indicated that compared with the standard method (i.e., crystal violet tetrazolium agar), the method that performed the best, based on balanced accuracy (i.e., the average of sensitivity and specificity), was coliform Petrifilm evaluated for the presence of any growth after 48 h of incubation (sensitivity = 0.787; specificity = 0.839). This method can be easily adopted by the dairy industry as many processing facilities already test for Coliforms using coliform Petrifilm. Improving the ability of processors to detect PPC will improve the quality of the fluid milk supply.
-
symposium review effect of post pasteurization contamination on fluid milk quality
Journal of Dairy Science, 2018Co-Authors: N H Marti, Marti WiedmaAbstract:ABSTRACT Fluid milk quality in the United States has improved steadily over the last 2 decades, in large part due to the reduction in post-pasteurization contamination (PPC). Despite these improvements, some studies suggest that almost 50% of fluid milk still shows evidence of PPC with organisms that are able to grow at 6°C, even though PPC may be much less frequent in some facilities. Several gram-negative bacteria, when introduced as PPC, can grow rapidly at refrigeration temperatures around 6°C and can lead to bacterial levels above 20,000 cfu/mL (the regulatory limit for bacterial numbers in fluid milk in the United States) and spoilage that can be detected sensorially within 7 to 10 d of processing. Importantly, however, storage temperature can have a considerable effect on microbial growth, and fluid milk stored at 4°C and below may show considerably delayed onset of microbial growth and spoilage compared with samples stored at what may be considered mild abuse (6°C and above). Notable organisms that cause PPC and grow at refrigeration temperatures include psychrotolerant Enterobacteriaceae and Coliforms, as well as Pseudomonas . These organisms are known to produce a variety of enzymes that lead to flavor, odor, and body defects that can ultimately affect consumer perception and willingness to buy. Detecting PPC in high temperature, short time, freshly pasteurized fluid milk can be challenging because PPC often occurs sporadically and at low levels. Additionally, indicator organisms typically used in fluid milk (i.e., Coliforms) have been shown to represent only a fraction of the total PPC. Recent studies indicate that Coliforms account for less than 20% of the total gram-negative organisms introduced into fluid milk after pasteurization. In contrast, Pseudomonas , which is not a coliform and therefore is not detected using coliform media, is the most commonly isolated genus in PPC fluid milk. To reduce PPC, processors must (1) use testing methods that can detect both Coliforms and non-coliform gram-negatives (i.e., Pseudomonas ) to understand true contamination rates and patterns, and (2) establish cleaning and sanitation protocols and employee and management behaviors that target persistent and transient PPC organisms.
N H Marti - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
short communication coliform petrifilm as an alternative method for detecting total gram negative bacteria in fluid milk
Journal of Dairy Science, 2020Co-Authors: A Rojas, Marti Wiedma, S I Murphy, N H MartiAbstract:Postpasteurization contamination (PPC) of fluid milk remains a challenge for some dairy processors. Pseudomonas is the most common contaminant of fluid milk after pasteurization, and therefore methods to detect PPC should be inclusive of Pseudomonas and other gram-negative contaminants (e.g., coliform bacteria). Our objective was to compare the ability of 3M (St. Paul, MN) coliform and Enterobacteriaceae (EB) Petrifilm to detect total gram-negative bacteria with that of the standard method, crystal violet tetrazolium agar. To that end, we evaluated coliform Petrifilm, EB Petrifilm, and crystal violet tetrazolium agar to detect gram-negative bacteria in naturally contaminated samples of fluid milk. A total of 92 observations derived from shelf-life testing of 33 milk samples from 5 different processing facilities were evaluated for (1) presence of Coliforms on coliform Petrifilm at both 24 and 48 h of incubation; (2) presence of any growth, regardless of gas production, on coliform Petrifilm at both 24 and 48 h of incubation; (3) presence of EB on EB Petrifilm at both 24 and 48 h of incubation; (4) presence of any growth, regardless of gas or acid production, on EB Petrifilm at both 24 and 48 h of incubation; and (5) presence of gram-negative bacteria on crystal violet tetrazolium agar after 48 h of incubation. Sensitivity and specificity analysis of results indicated that compared with the standard method (i.e., crystal violet tetrazolium agar), the method that performed the best, based on balanced accuracy (i.e., the average of sensitivity and specificity), was coliform Petrifilm evaluated for the presence of any growth after 48 h of incubation (sensitivity = 0.787; specificity = 0.839). This method can be easily adopted by the dairy industry as many processing facilities already test for Coliforms using coliform Petrifilm. Improving the ability of processors to detect PPC will improve the quality of the fluid milk supply.
-
symposium review effect of post pasteurization contamination on fluid milk quality
Journal of Dairy Science, 2018Co-Authors: N H Marti, Marti WiedmaAbstract:ABSTRACT Fluid milk quality in the United States has improved steadily over the last 2 decades, in large part due to the reduction in post-pasteurization contamination (PPC). Despite these improvements, some studies suggest that almost 50% of fluid milk still shows evidence of PPC with organisms that are able to grow at 6°C, even though PPC may be much less frequent in some facilities. Several gram-negative bacteria, when introduced as PPC, can grow rapidly at refrigeration temperatures around 6°C and can lead to bacterial levels above 20,000 cfu/mL (the regulatory limit for bacterial numbers in fluid milk in the United States) and spoilage that can be detected sensorially within 7 to 10 d of processing. Importantly, however, storage temperature can have a considerable effect on microbial growth, and fluid milk stored at 4°C and below may show considerably delayed onset of microbial growth and spoilage compared with samples stored at what may be considered mild abuse (6°C and above). Notable organisms that cause PPC and grow at refrigeration temperatures include psychrotolerant Enterobacteriaceae and Coliforms, as well as Pseudomonas . These organisms are known to produce a variety of enzymes that lead to flavor, odor, and body defects that can ultimately affect consumer perception and willingness to buy. Detecting PPC in high temperature, short time, freshly pasteurized fluid milk can be challenging because PPC often occurs sporadically and at low levels. Additionally, indicator organisms typically used in fluid milk (i.e., Coliforms) have been shown to represent only a fraction of the total PPC. Recent studies indicate that Coliforms account for less than 20% of the total gram-negative organisms introduced into fluid milk after pasteurization. In contrast, Pseudomonas , which is not a coliform and therefore is not detected using coliform media, is the most commonly isolated genus in PPC fluid milk. To reduce PPC, processors must (1) use testing methods that can detect both Coliforms and non-coliform gram-negatives (i.e., Pseudomonas ) to understand true contamination rates and patterns, and (2) establish cleaning and sanitation protocols and employee and management behaviors that target persistent and transient PPC organisms.
Gianluca Corno - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
a global multinational survey of cefotaxime resistant Coliforms in urban wastewater treatment plants
Environment International, 2020Co-Authors: Roberto B M Marano, Telma Fernandes, Celia M Manaia, Olga C Nunes, Donald Morrison, Thomas U Berendonk, Norbert Kreuzinger, Tanel Telson, Gianluca CornoAbstract:The World Health Organization Global Action Plan recommends integrated surveillance programs as crucial strategies for monitoring antibiotic resistance. Although several national surveillance programs are in place for clinical and veterinary settings, no such schemes exist for monitoring antibiotic-resistant bacteria in the environment. In this transnational study, we developed, validated, and tested a low-cost surveillance and easy to implement approach to evaluate antibiotic resistance in wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) by targeting cefotaxime-resistant (CTX-R) Coliforms as indicators. The rationale for this approach was: i) coliform quantification methods are internationally accepted as indicators of fecal contamination in recreational waters and are therefore routinely applied in analytical labs; ii) CTX-R Coliforms are clinically relevant, associated with extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs), and are rare in pristine environments. We analyzed 57 WWTPs in 22 countries across Europe, Asia, Africa, Australia, and North America. CTX-R Coliforms were ubiquitous in raw sewage and their relative abundance varied significantly (<0.1% to 38.3%), being positively correlated (p < 0.001) with regional atmospheric temperatures. Although most WWTPs removed large proportions of CTX-R Coliforms, loads over 103 colony-forming units per mL were occasionally observed in final effluents. We demonstrate that CTX-R coliform monitoring is a feasible and affordable approach to assess wastewater antibiotic resistance status.
Catherine W. Donnelly - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Comparison of Methods for Determining Coliform and Escherichia coli Levels in Apple Cider
Journal of Food Protection, 1997Co-Authors: Todd M. Silk, Elliot T. Ryser, Catherine W. DonnellyAbstract:The main objective of this research was to determine the easiest and most reliable media for enumerating coliform bacteria and Escherichia coli levels in apple cider. During the autumn of 1994 a total of 59 apple cider samples were collected directly from 12 cider producers and were assessed for bacterial levels and pH. Plate count agar was used to determine heterotrophic bacteria levels. Coliform levels were determined using three different media: violet red bile agar (VRBA), Petrifilm High Sensitivity Coliform Count Plates (PHSCCP), and Trypticase soy agar with a VRBA overlay (TSA/VRBA) for attempted recovery of Coliforms injured by the low pH of the apple cider. Eosin methylene blue agar (EMBA) and Petrifilm E. coli Count Plates were used to screen cider samples for E. coli . Apple cider had an average pH of 3.34 ± 0.08. Heterotrophic bacterial levels ranged from 2.30 to 7.11 log CFU/ml. All cider samples contained coliform bacteria with levels varying greatly; on the different media, we found the following: on VRBA,