Conflict Resolution

14,000,000 Leading Edge Experts on the ideXlab platform

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

The Experts below are selected from a list of 58071 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Kiam Tian Seow - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • SMC - Multiagent Conflict Resolution Planning
    2013 IEEE International Conference on Systems Man and Cybernetics, 2013
    Co-Authors: Manh Tung Pham, Kiam Tian Seow
    Abstract:

    This paper contributes to the multiagent constraint framework for synthesizing correct local plans and coordination strategies for every participating agent, and meeting their local goals without Conflict or blocking. Existing work has focused mainly on developing Conflict Resolution algorithms for various different types of constraint systems. This paper addresses a new but related problem called multiagent Conflict Resolution planning for multiple coordination plans. To resolve all potential Conflicts between multiagent plans, the problem is to be able to efficiently plan and intelligently select an optimal process plan showing the sequential or partial orders of applying Conflict Resolution algorithms. A generic approach to the problem is developed that is applicable to various types of constraint systems. Two new innovations are proposed: (1) A comprehensible network model that shows the relationships between agents and their constraints, and (2) a compact AND/OR graph representation of Conflict Resolution (process) plans. An AND/OR graph plan generation algorithm is proposed and evaluated. The selection of an optimal Conflict Resolution plan over the AND/OR graph representation is discussed. A case study is presented.

  • Multiagent Conflict Resolution Planning
    2013 IEEE International Conference on Systems Man and Cybernetics, 2013
    Co-Authors: Manh Tung Pham, Kiam Tian Seow
    Abstract:

    This paper contributes to the multiagent constraint framework for synthesizing correct local plans and coordination strategies for every participating agent, and meeting their local goals without Conflict or blocking. Existing work has focused mainly on developing Conflict Resolution algorithms for various different types of constraint systems. This paper addresses a new but related problem called multiagent Conflict Resolution planning for multiple coordination plans. To resolve all potential Conflicts between multiagent plans, the problem is to be able to efficiently plan and intelligently select an optimal process plan showing the sequential or partial orders of applying Conflict Resolution algorithms. A generic approach to the problem is developed that is applicable to various types of constraint systems. Two new innovations are proposed: (1) A comprehensible network model that shows the relationships between agents and their constraints, and (2) a compact AND/OR graph representation of Conflict Resolution (process) plans. An AND/OR graph plan generation algorithm is proposed and evaluated. The selection of an optimal Conflict Resolution plan over the AND/OR graph representation is discussed. A case study is presented.

Kevin Avruch - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • context and pretext in Conflict Resolution culture identity power and practice
    2012
    Co-Authors: Kevin Avruch
    Abstract:

    Foreword Acknowledgments Part 1 Culture and Conflict Resolution 1 Introduction: Culture, Conflict, and Conflict Resolution 2 Context and Pretext in Conflict Resolution 3 Culture, Relativism, and Human Rights 4 Constructing Identity 5 Type I and Type II Errors in Culturally Sensitive Conflict Resolution Practice Part 2 Culture and Identity, Dilemmas of Power 6 Culture Theory, Culture Clash, and the Practice of Conflict Resolution 7 Negotiating Beyond Interests: The Poverty of Buyer and Seller 8 After Violence: TRCs and Reconstructing Identity 9 Conflict Resolution and the Dilemma of Power Afterword Note References Cited Index About the Author

  • Conflict Resolution: Cross-Cultural Perspectives
    1998
    Co-Authors: Kevin Avruch, Peter Black, Joseph A. Scimecca
    Abstract:

    Series Foreword Introduction: Culture and Conflict Resolution by Kevin Avruch Conflict Resolution in the United States: The Emergence of a Profession? by Joseph A. Scimecca Harmony Models and the Construction of Law by Laura Nader Tertius Luctans: Idiocosm, Caricature and Mask by F. G. Bailey Interpersonal Conflict Management Styles of Jordanian Managers by Kamil Kozan Conflict Resolution and Moral Community among the Dou Donggo (Indonesia) by Peter Just Surprised by Common Sense: Local Understandings and the Management of Conflict on Tobi, Republic of Belau by Peter W. Black Of Nets, Nails, and Problems: A Folk Language of Conflict Resolution in a Central American Setting by John Paul Lederach Rhetoric, Reality and Resolving Conflicts: Disentangling in a Solomon Islands Society by Geoffrey M. White Ho'oponopono: Straightening Family Relationships in Hawaii by E. Victoria Shook and Leonard Ke'ala Kwan Selected Bibliography Index

  • Culture & Conflict Resolution
    1998
    Co-Authors: Kevin Avruch
    Abstract:

    After years of relative neglect, culture is finally receiving due recognition as a key factor in the evolution and Resolution of Conflicts. Unfortunately, however, when theorists and practitioners of Conflict Resolution speak of ???culture, ??? they often understand and use it in a bewildering and unhelpful variety of ways. With sophistication and lucidity, "Culture and Conflict Resolution" exposes these shortcomings and proposes an alternative conception in which culture is seen as dynamic and derivative of individual experience. The book explores divergent theories of social Conflict and differing strategies that shape the conduct of diplomacy, and examines the role that culture has (and has not) played in Conflict Resolution. The author is as forceful in critiquing those who would dismiss or diminish culture??'s relevance as he is trenchant in advocating Conflict Resolution approaches that make the most productive use of a coherent concept of culture. In a lively style, Avruch challenges both scholars and practitioners not only to develop a clearer understanding of what culture is, but also to take that understanding and incorporate it into more effective Conflict Resolution processes.

Manh Tung Pham - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • SMC - Multiagent Conflict Resolution Planning
    2013 IEEE International Conference on Systems Man and Cybernetics, 2013
    Co-Authors: Manh Tung Pham, Kiam Tian Seow
    Abstract:

    This paper contributes to the multiagent constraint framework for synthesizing correct local plans and coordination strategies for every participating agent, and meeting their local goals without Conflict or blocking. Existing work has focused mainly on developing Conflict Resolution algorithms for various different types of constraint systems. This paper addresses a new but related problem called multiagent Conflict Resolution planning for multiple coordination plans. To resolve all potential Conflicts between multiagent plans, the problem is to be able to efficiently plan and intelligently select an optimal process plan showing the sequential or partial orders of applying Conflict Resolution algorithms. A generic approach to the problem is developed that is applicable to various types of constraint systems. Two new innovations are proposed: (1) A comprehensible network model that shows the relationships between agents and their constraints, and (2) a compact AND/OR graph representation of Conflict Resolution (process) plans. An AND/OR graph plan generation algorithm is proposed and evaluated. The selection of an optimal Conflict Resolution plan over the AND/OR graph representation is discussed. A case study is presented.

  • Multiagent Conflict Resolution Planning
    2013 IEEE International Conference on Systems Man and Cybernetics, 2013
    Co-Authors: Manh Tung Pham, Kiam Tian Seow
    Abstract:

    This paper contributes to the multiagent constraint framework for synthesizing correct local plans and coordination strategies for every participating agent, and meeting their local goals without Conflict or blocking. Existing work has focused mainly on developing Conflict Resolution algorithms for various different types of constraint systems. This paper addresses a new but related problem called multiagent Conflict Resolution planning for multiple coordination plans. To resolve all potential Conflicts between multiagent plans, the problem is to be able to efficiently plan and intelligently select an optimal process plan showing the sequential or partial orders of applying Conflict Resolution algorithms. A generic approach to the problem is developed that is applicable to various types of constraint systems. Two new innovations are proposed: (1) A comprehensible network model that shows the relationships between agents and their constraints, and (2) a compact AND/OR graph representation of Conflict Resolution (process) plans. An AND/OR graph plan generation algorithm is proposed and evaluated. The selection of an optimal Conflict Resolution plan over the AND/OR graph representation is discussed. A case study is presented.

E. Feron - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

Karen S. Wampler - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Conflict Resolution Styles Among Latino Couples
    Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 2006
    Co-Authors: J. Maria Bermudez, Nenetzin A. Reyes Ms, Karen S. Wampler
    Abstract:

    Abstract Conflict Resolution style was examined with 191 married Latino couples residing in Houston and Dallas, representing 21 different nationalities. The purpose of this study was to identify Conflict Resolution styles most predominant among Latino couples and to examine what demographic characteristics might be related to the couples' Conflict Resolution styles. Conflict Resolution style (Avoidant, Volatile, and Validator) measured by Gottman's Marital Conflict Scale (MSC; Gottman, 1994) was significantly related to wives' and husbands' religiosity, husbands' religion, the language in which the husband answered the survey, and wives' education. Contrary to the common perception of Latinos as as being Conflict avoidant, the majority of this sample identified themselves as having a Validating style of Conflict Resolution. Clinical and research implications for couple and family therapists are discussed.