The Experts below are selected from a list of 3099 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Hansgeorg Schmarr - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Quantitative determination of α-ionone, β-ionone, and β-damascenone and enantiodifferentiation of α-ionone in wine for authenticity control using multidimensional gas chromatography with tandem mass spectrometric detection
    Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 2016
    Co-Authors: Johannes Langen, Pascal Wegmann-herr, Hansgeorg Schmarr
    Abstract:

    Native concentRations of α-ionone, β-ionone, and β-damascenone were studied in various authentic and commercial wines. In addition, the Enantiomeric distribution of α-ionone was determined and its merits as a potential marker for aroma adulteRation in wine were discussed. For extraction of volatiles, headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) was applied, followed by heart-cut multidimensional gas chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometric detection for trace-level analysis. The enantioselective analysis of α-ionone was achieved with octakis(2,3-di- O -pentyl-6- O -methyl)-γ-cyclodextrin as the chiral selector in the sepaRation column for gas chromatography (GC). In all the authentic wines studied, α-ionone showed a high Enantiomeric Ratio in favor of the ( R )-enantiomer. Since an illegal addition of α-ionone in a racemic form changes the Enantiomeric Ratio, this Ratio may serve as an adulteRation marker. ConcentRations varied between

  • quantitative determination of α ionone β ionone and β damascenone and enantiodifferentiation of α ionone in wine for authenticity control using multidimensional gas chromatography with tandem mass spectrometric detection
    Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 2016
    Co-Authors: Johannes Langen, Pascal Wegmannherr, Hansgeorg Schmarr
    Abstract:

    Native concentRations of α-ionone, β-ionone, and β-damascenone were studied in various authentic and commercial wines. In addition, the Enantiomeric distribution of α-ionone was determined and its merits as a potential marker for aroma adulteRation in wine were discussed. For extraction of volatiles, headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) was applied, followed by heart-cut multidimensional gas chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometric detection for trace-level analysis. The enantioselective analysis of α-ionone was achieved with octakis(2,3-di-O-pentyl-6-O-methyl)-γ-cyclodextrin as the chiral selector in the sepaRation column for gas chromatography (GC). In all the authentic wines studied, α-ionone showed a high Enantiomeric Ratio in favor of the (R)-enantiomer. Since an illegal addition of α-ionone in a racemic form changes the Enantiomeric Ratio, this Ratio may serve as an adulteRation marker. ConcentRations varied between Rations up to 4.6 μg/L for α-ionone, 3.6 μg/L for β-ionone, and 4.3 μg/L for β-damascenone. Elevated α- and β-ionone concentRations serve as additional indicators for a potential adulteRation. In order to classify the concentRations of the analytes in the context of their odor activity in wine, odor thresholds were determined.

J Sivaguru - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

Andreas Goeke - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

Thorleif Anthonsen - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

Johannes Langen - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Quantitative determination of α-ionone, β-ionone, and β-damascenone and enantiodifferentiation of α-ionone in wine for authenticity control using multidimensional gas chromatography with tandem mass spectrometric detection
    Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 2016
    Co-Authors: Johannes Langen, Pascal Wegmann-herr, Hansgeorg Schmarr
    Abstract:

    Native concentRations of α-ionone, β-ionone, and β-damascenone were studied in various authentic and commercial wines. In addition, the Enantiomeric distribution of α-ionone was determined and its merits as a potential marker for aroma adulteRation in wine were discussed. For extraction of volatiles, headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) was applied, followed by heart-cut multidimensional gas chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometric detection for trace-level analysis. The enantioselective analysis of α-ionone was achieved with octakis(2,3-di- O -pentyl-6- O -methyl)-γ-cyclodextrin as the chiral selector in the sepaRation column for gas chromatography (GC). In all the authentic wines studied, α-ionone showed a high Enantiomeric Ratio in favor of the ( R )-enantiomer. Since an illegal addition of α-ionone in a racemic form changes the Enantiomeric Ratio, this Ratio may serve as an adulteRation marker. ConcentRations varied between

  • quantitative determination of α ionone β ionone and β damascenone and enantiodifferentiation of α ionone in wine for authenticity control using multidimensional gas chromatography with tandem mass spectrometric detection
    Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 2016
    Co-Authors: Johannes Langen, Pascal Wegmannherr, Hansgeorg Schmarr
    Abstract:

    Native concentRations of α-ionone, β-ionone, and β-damascenone were studied in various authentic and commercial wines. In addition, the Enantiomeric distribution of α-ionone was determined and its merits as a potential marker for aroma adulteRation in wine were discussed. For extraction of volatiles, headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) was applied, followed by heart-cut multidimensional gas chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometric detection for trace-level analysis. The enantioselective analysis of α-ionone was achieved with octakis(2,3-di-O-pentyl-6-O-methyl)-γ-cyclodextrin as the chiral selector in the sepaRation column for gas chromatography (GC). In all the authentic wines studied, α-ionone showed a high Enantiomeric Ratio in favor of the (R)-enantiomer. Since an illegal addition of α-ionone in a racemic form changes the Enantiomeric Ratio, this Ratio may serve as an adulteRation marker. ConcentRations varied between Rations up to 4.6 μg/L for α-ionone, 3.6 μg/L for β-ionone, and 4.3 μg/L for β-damascenone. Elevated α- and β-ionone concentRations serve as additional indicators for a potential adulteRation. In order to classify the concentRations of the analytes in the context of their odor activity in wine, odor thresholds were determined.