The Experts below are selected from a list of 360 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
David Cunningham - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
randomized phase iii trial of panitumumab with infusional fluorouracil leucovorin and oxaliplatin FOLFOX4 versus FOLFOX4 alone as first line treatment in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer the prime study
Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2010Co-Authors: Jean-yves Douillard, Salvatore Siena, Yves Humblet, Jim Cassidy, Josep Tabernero, Ronald Burkes, Mario Edmundo Barugel, Gyorgy Bodoky, David Cunningham, Jacek JassemAbstract:PURPOSE: Panitumumab, a fully human anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibody that improves progression-free survival (PFS), is approved as monotherapy for patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The Panitumumab Randomized Trial in Combination With Chemotherapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer to Determine Efficacy (PRIME) was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of panitumumab plus infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX4) versus FOLFOX4 alone as initial treatment for mCRC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this multicenter, phase III trial, patients with no prior chemotherapy for mCRC, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 2, and available tissue for biomarker testing were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive panitumumab-FOLFOX4 versus FOLFOX4. The primary end point was PFS; overall survival (OS) was a secondary end point. Results were prospectively analyzed on an intent-to-treat basis by tumor KRAS status. RESULTS: KRAS results were available for 93% of the 1,183 patients randomly assigned. In the wild-type (WT) KRAS stratum, panitumumab-FOLFOX4 significantly improved PFS compared with FOLFOX4 (median PFS, 9.6 v 8.0 months, respectively; hazard ratio [HR], 0.80; 95% CI, 0.66 to 0.97; P = .02). A nonsignificant increase in OS was also observed for panitumumab-FOLFOX4 versus FOLFOX4 (median OS, 23.9 v 19.7 months, respectively; HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.67 to 1.02; P = .072). In the mutant KRAS stratum, PFS was significantly reduced in the panitumumab-FOLFOX4 arm versus the FOLFOX4 arm (HR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.62; P = .02), and median OS was 15.5 months versus 19.3 months, respectively (HR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.98 to 1.57; P = .068). Adverse event rates were generally comparable across arms with the exception of toxicities known to be associated with anti-EGFR therapy. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that panitumumab-FOLFOX4 was well tolerated and significantly improved PFS in patients with WT KRAS tumors and underscores the importance of KRAS testing for patients with mCRC.
-
capecitabine plus oxaliplatin xelox versus 5 fluorouracil folinic acid plus oxaliplatin FOLFOX 4 as second line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer a randomized phase iii noninferiority study
Annals of Oncology, 2008Co-Authors: Mace L Rothenberg, Charles Butts, M Navarro, Y Bang, R Goel, Simon Gollins, S Laguerre, David CunninghamAbstract:Background: To demonstrate the noninferiority of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) versus 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX-4) as second-line therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer after prior irinotecan-based chemotherapy. Patients and methods: A total of 627 patients were randomly assigned to receive XELOX (n = 313) or FOLFOX-4 (n = 314) following disease progression/recurrence or intolerance to irinotecan-based chemotherapy. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Results: PFS for XELOX was noninferior to FOLFOX-4 [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.97; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.83-1.14] in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. Median PFS was 4.7 months with XELOX versus 4.8 months with FOLFOX-4. The robustness of the primary analysis was supported by multivariate and subgroup analyses. Median overall survival in the ITT population was 11.9 months with XELOX versus 12.5 months with FOLFOX-4 (HR = 1.02; 95% CI 0.86-1.21). Treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 50% of XELOX- and 65% of FOLFOX-4-treated patients. Whereas grade 3/4 neutropenia (35% versus 5% with XELOX) and febrile neutropenia (4% versus < 1%) were more common with FOLFOX-4, grade 3/4 diarrhea (19% versus 5% with FOLFOX-4) and grade 3 hand-foot syndrome (4% versus < 1%) were more common with XELOX. Conclusion: XELOX is noninferior to FOLFOX-4 when administered as second-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Peter Gibbs - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
first line selective internal radiotherapy plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer foxfire sirflox and foxfire global a combined analysis of three multicentre randomised phase 3 trials
Lancet Oncology, 2017Co-Authors: Harpreet Wasan, Marc Peeters, Peter Gibbs, Navesh K Sharma, Julien Taieb, Volker Heinemann, Jens Ricke, Michael Findlay, Andrew Weaver, Jamie MillsAbstract:Summary Background Data suggest selective internal radiotherapy (SIRT) in third-line or subsequent therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer has clinical benefit in patients with colorectal liver metastases with liver-dominant disease after chemotherapy. The FOXFIRE, SIRFLOX, and FOXFIRE-Global randomised studies evaluated the efficacy of combining first-line chemotherapy with SIRT using yttrium-90 resin microspheres in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer with liver metastases. The studies were designed for combined analysis of overall survival. Methods FOXFIRE, SIRFLOX, and FOXFIRE-Global were randomised, phase 3 trials done in hospitals and specialist liver centres in 14 countries worldwide (Australia, Belgium, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, New Zealand, Portugal, South Korea, Singapore, Spain, Taiwan, the UK, and the USA). Chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (WHO performance status 0 or 1) with liver metastases not suitable for curative resection or ablation were randomly assigned (1:1) to either oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy (FOLFOX: leucovorin, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin) or FOLFOX plus single treatment SIRT concurrent with cycle 1 or 2 of chemotherapy. In FOXFIRE, FOLFOX chemotherapy was OxMdG (oxaliplatin modified de Gramont chemotherapy; 85 mg/m 2 oxaliplatin infusion over 2 h, L-leucovorin 175 mg or D,L-leucovorin 350 mg infusion over 2 h, and 400 mg/m 2 bolus fluorouracil followed by a 2400 mg/m 2 continuous fluorouracil infusion over 46 h). In SIRFLOX and FOXFIRE-Global, FOLFOX chemotherapy was modified FOLFOX6 (85 mg/m 2 oxaliplatin infusion over 2 h, 200 mg leucovorin, and 400 mg/m 2 bolus fluorouracil followed by a 2400 mg/m 2 continuous fluorouracil infusion over 46 h). Randomisation was done by central minimisation with four factors: presence of extrahepatic metastases, tumour involvement of the liver, planned use of a biological agent, and investigational centre. Participants and investigators were not masked to treatment. The primary endpoint was overall survival, analysed in the intention-to-treat population, using a two-stage meta-analysis of pooled individual patient data. All three trials have completed 2 years of follow-up. FOXFIRE is registered with the ISRCTN registry, number ISRCTN83867919. SIRFLOX and FOXFIRE-Global are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT00724503 (SIRFLOX) and NCT01721954 (FOXFIRE-Global). Findings Between Oct 11, 2006, and Dec 23, 2014, 549 patients were randomly assigned to FOLFOX alone and 554 patients were assigned FOLFOX plus SIRT. Median follow-up was 43·3 months (IQR 31·6–58·4). There were 411 (75%) deaths in 549 patients in the FOLFOX alone group and 433 (78%) deaths in 554 patients in the FOLFOX plus SIRT group. There was no difference in overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] 1·04, 95% CI 0·90–1·19; p=0·61). The median survival time in the FOLFOX plus SIRT group was 22·6 months (95% CI 21·0–24·5) compared with 23·3 months (21·8–24·7) in the FOLFOX alone group. In the safety population containing patients who received at least one dose of study treatment, as treated, the most common grade 3–4 adverse event was neutropenia (137 [24%] of 571 patients receiving FOLFOX alone vs 186 (37%) of 507 patients receiving FOLFOX plus SIRT). Serious adverse events of any grade occurred in 244 (43%) of 571 patients receiving FOLFOX alone and 274 (54%) of 507 patients receiving FOLFOX plus SIRT. 10 patients in the FOLFOX plus SIRT group and 11 patients in the FOLFOX alone group died due to an adverse event; eight treatment-related deaths occurred in the FOLFOX plus SIRT group and three treatment-related deaths occurred in the FOLFOX alone group. Interpretation Addition of SIRT to first-line FOLFOX chemotherapy for patients with liver-only and liver-dominant metastatic colorectal cancer did not improve overall survival compared with that for FOLFOX alone. Therefore, early use of SIRT in combination with chemotherapy in unselected patients with metastatic colorectal cancer cannot be recommended. To further define the role of SIRT in metastatic colorectal cancer, careful patient selection and studies investigating the role of SIRT as consolidation therapy after chemotherapy are needed. Funding Bobby Moore Fund of Cancer Research UK, Sirtex Medical.
-
selective internal radiation therapy sirt with yttrium 90 resin microspheres plus standard systemic chemotherapy regimen of FOLFOX versus FOLFOX alone as first line treatment of non resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer the sirflox study
BMC Cancer, 2014Co-Authors: Peter Gibbs, Val Gebski, Mark Van Buskirk, Kenneth G Thurston, David N Cade, Guy Van HazelAbstract:Background In colorectal cancer (CRC), unresectable liver metastases are linked to poor prognosis. Systemic chemotherapy with regimens such as FOLFOX (combination of infusional 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and oxaliplatin) is the standard first-line treatment. The SIRFLOX trial was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of combining FOLFOX-based chemotherapy with Selective Internal Radiation Therapy (SIRT or radioembolisation) using yttrium-90 resin microspheres (SIR-Spheres®; Sirtex Medical Limited, North Sydney, Australia).
-
radioembolization of liver metastases from colorectal cancer using yttrium 90 microspheres with concomitant systemic oxaliplatin fluorouracil and leucovorin chemotherapy
Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2007Co-Authors: Ricky A Sharma, Guy Van Hazel, Bruno Morgan, David P Berry, Keith Blanshard, David H Price, Geoffrey C Bower, J Shannon, Peter Gibbs, William P StewardAbstract:Purpose Liver metastases represent the principal cause of death in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). Injection of resin microspheres (SIR Spheres)—containing the β-emitter, yttrium-90—into the arterial supply of the liver can cause radioembolization of metastases. This treatment has not been tested with the radiosensitizing chemotherapy, oxaliplatin, which appears synergistic in the treatment of CRC when combined with fluorouracil and leucovorin (FOLFOX). Patients and Methods A phase I study of SIR-Spheres therapy with modified FOLFOX4 systemic chemotherapy was conducted in patients with inoperable liver metastases from CRC who had not previously received chemotherapy for metastatic disease. Oxaliplatin (30 to 85 mg/m2) was administered for the first three cycles with full FOLFOX4 doses from cycle 4 until cycle 12. The primary end point was toxicity. Results Twenty patients were enrolled onto the study. Five patients experienced National Cancer Institute (NCI; Bethesda, MD) grade 3 abdominal...
Fernando Rivera - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
analysis of kras nras mutations in peak a randomized phase ii study of FOLFOX6 plus panitumumab pmab or bevacizumab bev as first line treatment tx for wild type wt kras exon 2 metastatic colorectal cancer mcrc
Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2013Co-Authors: Lee S. Schwartzberg, Fernando Rivera, Meinolf Karthaus, Gianpiero Fasola, Jeanluc Canon, Kelly S OlinerAbstract:3631 Background: PEAK estimated the tx effect of FOLFOX6 with pmab or bev in 1st-line WT KRAS mCRC. The PRIME study showed significantly improved progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with pmab + FOLFOX vs FOLFOX in pts with WT RAS (KRAS/NRAS exons 2, 3, 4) mCRC in a prospective-retrospective analysis (unpublished data). Methods: This prospective-retrospective analysis of PEAK was designed to assess the effect of pmab + FOLFOX6 or bev + FOLFOX6 on PFS (primary endpoint) and OS in WT RAS (KRAS/NRAS exons 2, 3, 4) mCRC. Pts were required to have WT KRAS exon 2 tumors. Bidirectional Sanger sequencing and Transgenomic SURVEYOR/WAVE analysis were independently conducted to detect mutations in KRAS exon 3 (codons 59/61), exon 4 (codons 117/146); NRAS exon 2 (codons 12/13), exon 3 (codons 59/61), exon 4 (codons 117/146); BRAF exon 15 (codon 600) in banked specimens. Results: 285 WT KRAS (exon 2) mCRC patients (pts) were randomized, 278 received tx. The current RAS ascertainment rate is 75%. T...
-
randomized phase iii study of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin compared with fluorouracil folinic acid plus oxaliplatin as first line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer
Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2008Co-Authors: Jim Cassidy, Stephen Clarke, Eduardo Diazrubio, Werner Scheithauer, A Figer, Ralph Wong, Sheryl Koski, Mikhail Lichinitser, Tsaishen Yang, Fernando RiveraAbstract:Purpose To evaluate whether capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) is noninferior to fluorouracil. folinic acid, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX-4) as first-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC). Patients and Methods The initial design of this trial was a randomized, two-arm, noninferiority, phase III comparison of XELOX versus FOLFOX-4. After patient accrual had begun, the trial design was amended in 2003 after bevacizumab phase III data became available. The resulting 2 × 2 factorial design randomly assigned patients to XELOX versus FOLFOX-4, and then to also receive either bevacizumab or placebo. We report here the results of the analysis of the XELOX versus FOLFOX-4 arms. The analysis of bevacizumab versus placebo with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy is reported separately. The prespecified primary end point for the noninferiority analysis was progression-free survival. Results The intent-to-treat population comprised 634 patients from the original two-arm portion of the study, plus an additional ...
-
optimox1 a randomized study of FOLFOX4 or FOLFOX7 with oxaliplatin in a stop and go fashion in advanced colorectal cancer a gercor study
Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2006Co-Authors: Christophe Tournigand, Laurent Mineur, E Carola, Andres Cervantes, A Figer, Gerard Lledo, M Flesch, Marc Buyse, P L Etienne, Fernando RiveraAbstract:Purpose In metastatic colorectal cancer, a combination of leucovorin (LV) and fluorouracil (FU) with oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) 4 is a standard first-line regimen. The cumulative neurotoxicity of oxaliplatin often requires therapy to be stopped in patients who are still responding. This study evaluates a new strategy of intermittent oxaliplatin treatment that is based on FOLFOX7, a simplified leucovorin and fluorouracil regimen with high-dose oxaliplatin. Patients and Methods Previously untreated patients were randomly assigned to either FOLFOX4 administered every 2 weeks until progression (arm A) or FOLFOX7 for six cycles, maintenance without oxaliplatin for 12 cycles, and reintroduction of FOLFOX7 (arm B). Results Six hundred twenty patients were enrolled, including an exploratory cohort of 95 elderly or poor prognosis patients. Median progression-free survival and survival times were 9.0 and 19.3 months, respectively, in patients allocated to arm A compared with 8.7 and 21.2 months, respectively, in patients...
Jim Cassidy - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
xelox vs FOLFOX 4 as first line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer no16966 updated results
British Journal of Cancer, 2011Co-Authors: Jim Cassidy, A Figer, Stephen Clarke, Eduardo Diazrubio, Sheryl Koski, W Scheithauer, R Wong, K Rittweger, F Gilberg, Leonard B SaltzAbstract:XELOX vs FOLFOX-4 as first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: NO16966 updated results
-
randomized phase iii trial of panitumumab with infusional fluorouracil leucovorin and oxaliplatin FOLFOX4 versus FOLFOX4 alone as first line treatment in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer the prime study
Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2010Co-Authors: Jean-yves Douillard, Salvatore Siena, Yves Humblet, Jim Cassidy, Josep Tabernero, Ronald Burkes, Mario Edmundo Barugel, Gyorgy Bodoky, David Cunningham, Jacek JassemAbstract:PURPOSE: Panitumumab, a fully human anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibody that improves progression-free survival (PFS), is approved as monotherapy for patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The Panitumumab Randomized Trial in Combination With Chemotherapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer to Determine Efficacy (PRIME) was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of panitumumab plus infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX4) versus FOLFOX4 alone as initial treatment for mCRC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this multicenter, phase III trial, patients with no prior chemotherapy for mCRC, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 2, and available tissue for biomarker testing were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive panitumumab-FOLFOX4 versus FOLFOX4. The primary end point was PFS; overall survival (OS) was a secondary end point. Results were prospectively analyzed on an intent-to-treat basis by tumor KRAS status. RESULTS: KRAS results were available for 93% of the 1,183 patients randomly assigned. In the wild-type (WT) KRAS stratum, panitumumab-FOLFOX4 significantly improved PFS compared with FOLFOX4 (median PFS, 9.6 v 8.0 months, respectively; hazard ratio [HR], 0.80; 95% CI, 0.66 to 0.97; P = .02). A nonsignificant increase in OS was also observed for panitumumab-FOLFOX4 versus FOLFOX4 (median OS, 23.9 v 19.7 months, respectively; HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.67 to 1.02; P = .072). In the mutant KRAS stratum, PFS was significantly reduced in the panitumumab-FOLFOX4 arm versus the FOLFOX4 arm (HR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.62; P = .02), and median OS was 15.5 months versus 19.3 months, respectively (HR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.98 to 1.57; P = .068). Adverse event rates were generally comparable across arms with the exception of toxicities known to be associated with anti-EGFR therapy. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that panitumumab-FOLFOX4 was well tolerated and significantly improved PFS in patients with WT KRAS tumors and underscores the importance of KRAS testing for patients with mCRC.
-
randomized phase iii study of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin compared with fluorouracil folinic acid plus oxaliplatin as first line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer
Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2008Co-Authors: Jim Cassidy, Stephen Clarke, Eduardo Diazrubio, Werner Scheithauer, A Figer, Ralph Wong, Sheryl Koski, Mikhail Lichinitser, Tsaishen Yang, Fernando RiveraAbstract:Purpose To evaluate whether capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) is noninferior to fluorouracil. folinic acid, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX-4) as first-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC). Patients and Methods The initial design of this trial was a randomized, two-arm, noninferiority, phase III comparison of XELOX versus FOLFOX-4. After patient accrual had begun, the trial design was amended in 2003 after bevacizumab phase III data became available. The resulting 2 × 2 factorial design randomly assigned patients to XELOX versus FOLFOX-4, and then to also receive either bevacizumab or placebo. We report here the results of the analysis of the XELOX versus FOLFOX-4 arms. The analysis of bevacizumab versus placebo with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy is reported separately. The prespecified primary end point for the noninferiority analysis was progression-free survival. Results The intent-to-treat population comprised 634 patients from the original two-arm portion of the study, plus an additional ...
Gerard Lledo - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
capecitabine plus oxaliplatin xelox versus 5 fluorouracil leucovorin plus oxaliplatin FOLFOX 6 as first line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer
International Journal of Cancer, 2011Co-Authors: Michel Ducreux, Marc Ychou, M Hebbar, Gerard Lledo, Jaafar Bennouna, Thierry Conroy, Antoine Adenis, Roger Faroux, Christine Rebischung, Loic BergougnouxAbstract:A regimen consisting of 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin plus oxaliplatin (FOLFOX-6) is widely used in France in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC). The aim of our study was to demonstrate the non-inferiority of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) versus FOLFOX-6 for this indication. Patients were randomly assigned to receive XELOX or FOLFOX-6 for 6 months. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) in the per-protocol (PP) population; however, progression-free and overall survival (OS), time to response and response duration were also assessed. A total of 306 patients were enrolled (XELOX n = 156; FOLFOX-6 n = 150). ORR was 42 and 46% with XELOX and FOLFOX-6, respectively, in the PP population. The difference between groups was 4.7%; the upper limit of the unilateral 95% confidence interval (14.4%) was below the non-inferiority margin of 15%. In the intent-to-treat population, median progression-free survival was 8.8 months with XELOX and 9.3 months with FOLFOX-6, and median OS was 19.9 and 20.5 months, respectively. XELOX patients had significantly more grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia (12% vs. 5%) and diarrhoea (14% vs. 7%), but significantly less grade 3/4 neutropenia (5% vs. 47%), febrile neutropenia (0% vs. 6%) and neuropathy (11% vs. 26%) than FOLFOX-6 patients. We conclude that XELOX is non-inferior in terms of efficacy to FOLFOX-6 in the first-line treatment of MCRC, but has a different toxicity profile.
-
can chemotherapy be discontinued in unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer the gercor optimox2 study
Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2009Co-Authors: Benoist Chibaudel, Thierry Andre, Laurent Mineur, M Mabro, E Carola, Gerard Lledo, F Maindraultgoebel, Mohammed Bennamoun, Pascal Artru, M FleschAbstract:Purpose This study compared chemotherapy discontinuation with maintenance therapy with leucovorin and fluorouracil after six cycles of folinic acid, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Patients and Methods Two hundred two patients with untreated metastatic colorectal cancer were randomly assigned to receive six cycles of modified FOLFOX7 (mFOLFOX7) followed by simplified leucovorin plus bolus and infusional fluorouracil until progression (arm 1 or maintenance arm, n = 98) or six cycles of mFOLFOX7 before a complete stop of chemotherapy (arm 2 or chemotherapy-free interval [CFI] arm, n = 104). Reintroduction of mFOLFOX7 was scheduled after tumor progression in both arms. The primary study end point was duration of disease control (DDC). Results Median DDC was 13.1 months in patients assigned to the maintenance arm and 9.2 months in patients assigned to the CFI arm (P = .046). Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall surv...
-
FOLFOX in patients aged between 76 and 80 years with metastatic colorectal cancer an exploratory cohort of the optimox1 study
Cancer, 2007Co-Authors: A Figer, Thierry Andre, Christophe Tournigand, Gerard Lledo, M Flesch, N Perezstaub, Elisabeth Carola, Ramon Barcelo, Andre Cervantes, P ColinAbstract:BACKGROUND. Patients older than 75 years of age are usually excluded from metastatic colorectal cancer randomized studies. The OPTIMOX1 study evaluated FOLFOX7, a simplified (s) leucovorin (LV) and 5-fluorouracil (5FU) regimen (sLV5FU2) with high-dose oxaliplatin, in a new oxaliplatin stop-and-go strategy. An exploratory cohort of patients aged 76 to 80 years was included in the study. METHODS. In all, 620 previously untreated patients were randomized between FOLFOX4 until progression (arm A), or FOLFOX7 for 6 cycles, maintenance without oxaliplatin for 12 cycles, and reintroduction of FOLFOX7 (arm B). RESULTS. A total of 37 patients aged 76 to 80 years were included, 20 in arm A and 17 in arm B. The overall response rate (ORR) was 59.4%, comparable to younger patients (59%). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 9.0 months and median overall survival (OS) was 20.7 months. These results did not differ from that in younger patients ≤75 years in the OPTIMOX1 study with PFS 9.0 months (P = .63) and OS 20.2 months (P = .57). They experienced slightly more grade 3 of 4 toxicity than younger patients: 65% versus 48% (P = .06), mainly with more neutropenia (41% vs 24%, P = .03) and neurotoxicity (22% vs 11%, P = .06). Tolerability, however, was manageable and no toxic death occurred in this elderly population. CONCLUSIONS. The efficacy of FOLFOX-based treatment was maintained in patients >75 years with both FOLFOX regimens. The oxaliplatin stop-and-go management strategy performed well in this population. Cancer 2007. © 2007 American Cancer Society.
-
final results of optimox2 a large randomized phase ii study of maintenance therapy or chemotherapy free intervals cfi after FOLFOX in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer mrc a gercor study
Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2006Co-Authors: F Maindraultgoebel, Laurent Mineur, M Mabro, C Louvet, Benoist Chibaudel, T Andre, Gerard Lledo, Mohammed Bennamoun, Pascal Artru, A De GramontAbstract:4013 Background: The OPTIMOX2 study was designed to evaluate a complete stop of chemotherapy after 6 bimonthly cycles of FOLFOX. Methods: OPTIMOX2 is a large phase II study performed before the availability of bevacizumab. Patients (pts) were randomized between an OPTIMOX1 arm: 6 cycles of FOLFOX7 followed by LV5FU2 until progression then reintroduction of FOLFOX7, and the OPTIMOX2 arm: 6 cycles of FOLFOX7, complete stop of chemotherapy and reintroduction of FOLFOX7 before the tumor progression reached the baseline measures. Results: 202 pts were included between Feb 2004 and Apr 2006. Response rates were (OPTIMOX1/OPTIMOX2): CR+PR 63%/61%. Median PFS were OPTIMOX1/OPTIMOX2) 8.3/6.7 months (p=.04). Median duration of disease control (DDC), addition of PFS of first FOLFOX7 administration plus PFS of FOLFOX reintroduction if no progression at first evaluation, was 10.8m in the OPTIMOX1 arm and 9.0m in the OPTIMOX2 arm, p=.32. Median duration of chemotherapy-free interval (CFI) in the OPTIMOX2 arm was 4.6 mo...
-
optimox1 a randomized study of FOLFOX4 or FOLFOX7 with oxaliplatin in a stop and go fashion in advanced colorectal cancer a gercor study
Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2006Co-Authors: Christophe Tournigand, Laurent Mineur, E Carola, Andres Cervantes, A Figer, Gerard Lledo, M Flesch, Marc Buyse, P L Etienne, Fernando RiveraAbstract:Purpose In metastatic colorectal cancer, a combination of leucovorin (LV) and fluorouracil (FU) with oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) 4 is a standard first-line regimen. The cumulative neurotoxicity of oxaliplatin often requires therapy to be stopped in patients who are still responding. This study evaluates a new strategy of intermittent oxaliplatin treatment that is based on FOLFOX7, a simplified leucovorin and fluorouracil regimen with high-dose oxaliplatin. Patients and Methods Previously untreated patients were randomly assigned to either FOLFOX4 administered every 2 weeks until progression (arm A) or FOLFOX7 for six cycles, maintenance without oxaliplatin for 12 cycles, and reintroduction of FOLFOX7 (arm B). Results Six hundred twenty patients were enrolled, including an exploratory cohort of 95 elderly or poor prognosis patients. Median progression-free survival and survival times were 9.0 and 19.3 months, respectively, in patients allocated to arm A compared with 8.7 and 21.2 months, respectively, in patients...