Fruit Vegetable

14,000,000 Leading Edge Experts on the ideXlab platform

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

The Experts below are selected from a list of 53136 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

R Goerlich - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

Am Boetzer - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

Bm Arendt - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

P Winkler - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

Yanping Liu - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • performances of anaerobic co digestion of Fruit Vegetable waste fvw and food waste fw single phase vs two phase
    Bioresource Technology, 2013
    Co-Authors: Fei She, Hairong Yua, Yunzhi Pang, Shuli Che, Aoning Zhu, Dexu Zou, Yanping Liu
    Abstract:

    Abstract The co-digestion of Fruit & Vegetable waste (FVW) and food waste (FW) was performed at various organic loading ratios (OLRs) in single-phase and two-phase system, respectively. The results showed that the ethanol-type fermentation dominated in both digestion processes when OLR was at low levels ( 2.0 g(VS) L−1 d−1), which could cause unstable anaerobic digestion. Single-phase digestion was better than two-phase digestion in term of 4.1% increase in CH4 production at lower OLRs (

  • performances of anaerobic co digestion of Fruit Vegetable waste fvw and food waste fw single phase vs two phase
    Bioresource Technology, 2013
    Co-Authors: Yunzhi Pang, Yanping Liu, Fei Shen, Hairong Yuan, Shulin Chen, Baoning Zhu, Dexun Zou, Liang Yu, Xiujin Li
    Abstract:

    Abstract The co-digestion of Fruit & Vegetable waste (FVW) and food waste (FW) was performed at various organic loading ratios (OLRs) in single-phase and two-phase system, respectively. The results showed that the ethanol-type fermentation dominated in both digestion processes when OLR was at low levels ( −1  d −1 ). The propionic acid was rapidly accumulated as OLR was increased to higher levels (>2.0 g(VS) L −1  d −1 ), which could cause unstable anaerobic digestion. Single-phase digestion was better than two-phase digestion in term of 4.1% increase in CH 4 production at lower OLRs ( −1  d −1 ). However, at higher level of OLR (⩾2.0 g(VS) L −1  d −1 ), two-phase digestion achieved higher CH 4 production of 0.351–0.455 L (g VS) −1  d −1 , which were 7.0–15.8% more than that of single-phase. Additionally, two-phase digestion presented more stable operation, and higher OLR treatment capacity. Furthermore, comparison of these two systems with bioenergy recovery revealed that two-phase system overall presented higher bioenergy yield than single-phase.