Hydroelectricity

14,000,000 Leading Edge Experts on the ideXlab platform

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

The Experts below are selected from a list of 360 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Recep Bakis - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • the current status and future opportunities of Hydroelectricity
    Energy Sources Part B-economics Planning and Policy, 2007
    Co-Authors: Recep Bakis
    Abstract:

    Abstract This study presents the status of and prospects for the current state of small hydropower technologies used to produce electricity and assesses their future prospects. The hydropower currently provides about 20% of the world's electricity supply and more than 40% of the electricity used in developing countries. Norway produces more than 99% of its electricity with hydropower. The hydropower is the leading source of renewable energy, providing more than 97% of all electricity generated by renewable sources. The chief advantage of hydro systems is elimination of the cost of fuel. Hydropower on a small-scale is in most cases “run-of-river,” with no dam or water storage, and is one of the most cost-effective and environmentally benign energy technologies to be considered both for rural electrification in less developed countries and further hydro developments in Europe.

Arjen Ysbert Hoekstra - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

B E Clothier - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • the water footprint of Hydroelectricity a methodological comparison from a case study in new zealand
    Journal of Cleaner Production, 2011
    Co-Authors: Indika Herath, M Deurer, D J Horne, Ranvir Singh, B E Clothier
    Abstract:

    Abstract Hydroelectricity has been rated to have a large water footprint (WF) on global average. We assessed the WF of Hydroelectricity by three different methods using New Zealand as a case study. The first (WF-1) and second (WF-2) methods only consider the consumptive water use of the Hydroelectricity generation system, while our third method (WF-3) accounts for the net water balance. Irrespective of the method, the WF of New Zealand’s Hydroelectricity was found much smaller than the commonly cited international value of 22 m3 GJ−1. Depending on the method, the national WF ranged from 1.55 m3 GJ−1 (WF-3) to 6.05 m3 GJ−1 (WF-1). The WF- 3 considers the net water balance including rainfall, which is the key driver for replenishing water resources. It provides meaningful information that helps our understanding of the differences of the WF in locations, which are diverse in terms of water resource availability. We highlight the effects of local climatic differences and the structural specifics of a Hydroelectricity scheme on the WF. The large variation in the WF of hydropower across New Zealand illustrates the inappropriateness of using global average values. Local values, calculated using our hydrologically rational method, must be used.

Eba Erik Vleuten - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • small scale hydropower in the netherlands problems and strategies of system builders
    Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016
    Co-Authors: T Tanja N Manders, Johanna Hoffken, Eba Erik Vleuten
    Abstract:

    Small-scale Hydroelectricity (hydel) currently receives worldwide attention as a clean, green, and socially just energy technology. People generally assume that downsizing hydel plants reduces harmful impacts. However, recent debates call for careful circumspection of small hydel’s environmental, social, and economic sustainability, if we are to avoid conflicts, costly setbacks, and hype-disappointment cycles. This paper provides such a circumspect case for the Netherlands, an interesting country thanks to its highly institutionalized water sector. We highlight the importance of studying hydel power as part of a larger, interconnected Large Technical System. For selected cases, we identify what tensions small hydel ‘system builders’ are facing and discuss which strategies they use to address these problems. We distinguish ‘yield to fit in’, ‘confirmative policy focus’, and ‘hydel legitimation’ strategies for the development of small-scale hydropower in the Dutch highly-institutionalized wet network.

Emily Grubert - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • conventional Hydroelectricity and the future of energy linking national inventory of dams and energy information administration data to facilitate analysis of Hydroelectricity
    The Electricity Journal, 2020
    Co-Authors: Emily Grubert
    Abstract:

    Abstract Within the energy community, conventional dam and reservoir-based Hydroelectricity is often viewed as a low-cost, immediately available zero-carbon resource that could facilitate more intermittent renewable electricity integration, seasonal storage, and other grid benefits. Conventional Hydroelectricity systems, however, are potentially unique among power plants in that energy provisioning is not the only priority for their fuel, stored water. This paper presents a record linkage between electricity- and dam management-oriented datasets to facilitate attention to the fundamental challenge of altering operational regimes for systems that have other uses.

  • water consumption from Hydroelectricity in the united states
    Advances in Water Resources, 2016
    Co-Authors: Emily Grubert
    Abstract:

    Abstract Understanding the relationship between water and energy systems is important for effective management of both resources. Improved data availability has made more comprehensive modeling of hydropower and its water use possible, even as droughts and climate change have made questions about reservoir evaporation responsiveness more timely. This work makes three main contributions: first, it presents national and regional estimates of gross evaporation and evaporation net of evapotranspiration from local land cover (“net evaporation”) for U.S. Hydroelectricity, arguing that net evaporation is more consistent with other measures of energy-related water intensity; second, it introduces and validates a method for estimating system-wide evaporation based on primary purpose allocation that reduces data requirements by two orders of magnitude; and third, it makes available for public use a full Penman–Monteith model with multiple built-in sensitivity analyses. Based on this model, the U.S. hydropower system consumes an estimated average of 1.7 m3 of net freshwater per GJ electricity produced (11 m3/GJ gross).