The Experts below are selected from a list of 62748 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Tanguy Van Ypersele - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Rewards versus Intellectual Property Rights
    The Journal of Law and Economics, 2001
    Co-Authors: Steven Shavell, Tanguy Van Ypersele
    Abstract:

    Abstract This paper compares reward systems to Intellectual Property Rights (patents and copyRights). Under a reward system, innovators are paid for innovations directly by the government (possibly on the basis of sales), and innovations pass immediately into the public domain. Thus, reward systems engender incentives to innovate without creating the monopoly power of Intellectual Property Rights. But a principal difficulty with rewards is the information required for their determination. We conclude in our model that Intellectual Property Rights do not possess a fundamental social advantage over reward systems and that an optional reward system—under which innovators choose between rewards and Intellectual Property Rights—is superior to Intellectual Property Rights.

  • Rewards Versus Intellectual Property Rights
    SSRN, 1999
    Co-Authors: Steven Shavell, Tanguy Van Ypersele
    Abstract:

    This paper compares reward systems to Intellectual Property Rights (patents and copyRights). Under a reward system, innovators are paid for innovations directly by government (possibly on the basis of sales), and innovations pass immediately into the public domain. Thus, reward systems engender incentives to innovate without creating the monopoly power of Intellectual Property Rights, but a principal difficulty with rewards is the information required for their determination. We conclude in our model that Intellectual Property Rights do not possess a fundamental social advantage over reward systems, and that an optional reward system--under which innovators choose between rewards and Intellectual Property Rights--is superior to Intellectual Property Rights.

Steven Shavell - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Rewards versus Intellectual Property Rights
    The Journal of Law and Economics, 2001
    Co-Authors: Steven Shavell, Tanguy Van Ypersele
    Abstract:

    Abstract This paper compares reward systems to Intellectual Property Rights (patents and copyRights). Under a reward system, innovators are paid for innovations directly by the government (possibly on the basis of sales), and innovations pass immediately into the public domain. Thus, reward systems engender incentives to innovate without creating the monopoly power of Intellectual Property Rights. But a principal difficulty with rewards is the information required for their determination. We conclude in our model that Intellectual Property Rights do not possess a fundamental social advantage over reward systems and that an optional reward system—under which innovators choose between rewards and Intellectual Property Rights—is superior to Intellectual Property Rights.

  • Rewards Versus Intellectual Property Rights
    SSRN, 1999
    Co-Authors: Steven Shavell, Tanguy Van Ypersele
    Abstract:

    This paper compares reward systems to Intellectual Property Rights (patents and copyRights). Under a reward system, innovators are paid for innovations directly by government (possibly on the basis of sales), and innovations pass immediately into the public domain. Thus, reward systems engender incentives to innovate without creating the monopoly power of Intellectual Property Rights, but a principal difficulty with rewards is the information required for their determination. We conclude in our model that Intellectual Property Rights do not possess a fundamental social advantage over reward systems, and that an optional reward system--under which innovators choose between rewards and Intellectual Property Rights--is superior to Intellectual Property Rights.

Birendra Srivastawa - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Management of Intellectual Property Rights in India: An updated review.
    Journal of natural science biology and medicine, 2011
    Co-Authors: Ruchi Tiwari, Gaurav Tiwari, Awani K Rai, Birendra Srivastawa
    Abstract:

    The World Trade Organization's agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights set global minimum standards for the protection of Intellectual Property, substantially increasing and expanding Intellectual Property Rights, and generated clear gains for the pharmaceutical industry and the developed world. The present review elaborates all aspects of Intellectual Property Rights in detail, along with their protection criteria.

Hu Bin-bin - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Some theoretical issues in the limitations on Intellectual Property Rights
    Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University, 2008
    Co-Authors: Hu Bin-bin
    Abstract:

    The limitations on Intellectual Property Rights are the reductive demarcation on the existing Intellectual Property Rights,falling into the special right category of Intellectual Property right.They are regulative rules,taking the Intellectual Property system and the specific Rights as premises.Its purpose is to regulate the relations between Intellectual Property Rights and other legitimate interests.The system of the limitations on Intellectual Property Rights is an important mechanism to balance the interests of Intellectual Property Rights holders and Intellectual Property Rights users and private Rights and public interests.The theory of socialization of ownership is not suitable to serving as a foundation theory for Intellectual Property right limitations.The research shows that Intellectual right and ownership differ a lot in their positions and roles in the history.The relevant arguments concerning limitations on Intellectual Property Rights in modern economic theories are more convincing.In the current Intellectual Property Rights regime,an important feature is the marriage between international trade and Intellectual Property Rights.The purpose of the marriage is to enhance the binding force of international Intellectual Property treaties. This marriage influences the limitations on Intellectual Property Rights greatly.

Ruchi Tiwari - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Management of Intellectual Property Rights in India: An updated review.
    Journal of natural science biology and medicine, 2011
    Co-Authors: Ruchi Tiwari, Gaurav Tiwari, Awani K Rai, Birendra Srivastawa
    Abstract:

    The World Trade Organization's agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights set global minimum standards for the protection of Intellectual Property, substantially increasing and expanding Intellectual Property Rights, and generated clear gains for the pharmaceutical industry and the developed world. The present review elaborates all aspects of Intellectual Property Rights in detail, along with their protection criteria.