The Experts below are selected from a list of 115920 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Hu Kai - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
On the Access Regulation in Bottleneck Monopoly
Economic Survey, 2009Co-Authors: Hu KaiAbstract:After competition is introduced in natural Monopoly industries,access reject is a typical strategic behavior of the bottleneck Monopoly firms,which intend to maintain the Monopoly in the vertical-integration market and limit the competition in the downstream market.The support of administrative Monopoly power to bottleneck Monopoly may reinforce the access-reject.Theoretical analyses show that access-reject may lead to the close of downstream competitive market in the natural Monopoly industries and the retrogression of marketization.Therefore it is necessary to introduce access regulation to promote competition.Because the bottleneck Monopoly is usually intertwined with the administrative Monopoly in the transitional period,the efficiency of access regulation depends on breaking the administrative Monopoly in which government and enterprises are unseparated.
-
Access regulation under the bottleneck Monopoly and the administrative Monopoly
Journal of Xi'an University of Post and Telecommunications, 2009Co-Authors: Hu KaiAbstract:After introducing competition in the natural Monopoly industries,access-reject is a typical strategic behavior of the bottleneck Monopoly firm which gets hold of the support of the administrative Monopoly power.The aim of access-reject is to maintain the Monopoly in the vertical-integration market and to limit the competition in the downstream market.Theory analysis shows that access-reject may lead to market foreclosure and retrogression of marketization in the natural Monopoly industries.Therefore,access regulation is necessary to push competition.Access regulation ioncludes direct regulation by government and indirect regulation by Anti-trust Law.Because the bottleneck Monopoly is usually intertwined with the administrative Monopoly,the efficiency of access regulation depends on the break of the latter.
Yang Qian - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
the regulation and administrative Monopoly in natural monopolies take china s telecom industry as an example
Journal of Shijiazhuang of University of Economics, 2009Co-Authors: Yang QianAbstract:Natural Monopoly always contains some administrative Monopoly.The "Anti-Monopoly Law" gives the exemption to natural Monopoly,but gives more limitation to administrative Monopoly.So distinguishing administrative Monopoly from natural Monopoly is very important.It is considered that improper entry and price regulation is the main cause of the administrative Monopoly in the natural Monopoly.The administrative Monopoly causes more state-owned enterprises and higher concentration ratio.It also causes the transform from the real profits to the income of workers and a huge efficiency loss.So some reform is needed.
-
The Regulation and Administrative Monopoly in Natural Monopolies——Take China′s Telecom Industry as an Example
Journal of Shijiazhuang of University of Economics, 2009Co-Authors: Yang QianAbstract:Natural Monopoly always contains some administrative Monopoly.The "Anti-Monopoly Law" gives the exemption to natural Monopoly,but gives more limitation to administrative Monopoly.So distinguishing administrative Monopoly from natural Monopoly is very important.It is considered that improper entry and price regulation is the main cause of the administrative Monopoly in the natural Monopoly.The administrative Monopoly causes more state-owned enterprises and higher concentration ratio.It also causes the transform from the real profits to the income of workers and a huge efficiency loss.So some reform is needed.
Li Yun - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
The Income Distribution Effects of Monopoly Industries——The Empirical Analysis of Urban Monopoly Industries
Journal of Central University of Finance & Economics, 2007Co-Authors: Li YunAbstract:Monopoly industries gain heavy income and profits by relying on monopolizing the whole market which comes from the government' s warrants for quite a long time. And this results in an ascending income disparity between Monopoly industries and other industries. By decomposing and computing the income distribution of Monopoly industries, we can make clear the income distribution effects between Monopoly industries and other industries as well as interior in Monopoly industries only, which has been one of the urgent affairs in income distribution fields of China.
Peng Teng - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
On the Monopoly Origin of Inharmony of Income Distribution
Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2007Co-Authors: Peng TengAbstract:The present inharmony of income distribution mainly originates from Monopoly: power Monopoly gives birth to illegal income, resource Monopoly leads to irrational income and price Monopoly distorts income distribution. Counter-Monopoly becomes the crucial path to the harmony of income distribution: consummating the democratic mechanism of power to eliminate power Monopoly; introducing free competition to reduce and regulate resource Monopoly; strengthening the protection mechanism of the interest of the disadvantaged to eliminate price Monopoly.
Raul V. Fabella - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Consumer resistance and Monopoly behavior under franchise contestability
Public Choice, 1993Co-Authors: Raul V. FabellaAbstract:The probability of a deregulation under anti-Monopoly consumer lobby is generated at the Cournot-Nash equilibrium of a lobbying game which depends on the Monopoly rent and the deadweight loss. This probability is increasing and convex in Monopoly price. When the deregulation probability constraint is binding, the monopolist's price rises with the number of consumers, the competitive price and the given ceiling probability. The social cost of a Monopoly under franchise contestability differs from the Posner measure.
