Laser Prostatectomy

14,000,000 Leading Edge Experts on the ideXlab platform

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

The Experts below are selected from a list of 105 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

John N Kabalin - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

Gordon Muir - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

David M. Barrett - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • high power potassium titanyl phosphate Laser vaporization Prostatectomy
    Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 1998
    Co-Authors: Randall S Kuntzman, Reza S. Malek, David M. Barrett
    Abstract:

    In a search for potential therapeutic strategies for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) that would be associated with less morbidity than transurethral resection of the prostate, various types of Laser Prostatectomy have been used. Although the neodymium: Yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Nd: YAG) Laser allows performance of Prostatectomy in an almost bloodless field and without absorption of irrigant, the remaining necrotic tissue causes bladder outlet obstruction and related symptoms for 5 to 7 days after treatment. In contrast, the potassium titanyl phosphate (KTP) Laser has been found to vaporize tissue with minimal coagulation of the underlying structures. With use of the KTP Laser, heat is concentrated into a small volume, the tissue is ablated by rapid vaporization of cellular water, and a 2-mm rim of coagulated tissue is left. After favorable results were obtained in studies of canine prostates and human cadavers, we implemented clinical use of 60-W KTP Laser Prostatectomy in selected patients. In 10 patients with symptomatic BPH who ranged in age from 52 to 80 years, outpatient KTP Laser Prostatectomy yielded significantly increased mean peak urinary flow rates (from 8.0 mL/s preoperatively to 19.4 mL/s within 24 hours after the procedure). No patient had hematuria, dysuria, or incontinence after removal of the catheter, and no patient required recatheterization. One patient, however, had urgency, and two other patients became febrile during the 24-hour observation period. Overall, KTP Laser vaporization Prostatectomy can provide immediate relief from obstructive symptoms of BPH and is not associated with dysuria.

  • high power 60 watt potassium titanyl phosphate Laser vaporization Prostatectomy in living canines and in human and canine cadavers
    Urology, 1997
    Co-Authors: Randall S Kuntzman, Reza S. Malek, David M. Barrett, David G Bostwick
    Abstract:

    Objectives We studied the safety and efficacy of 60-W potassium-titanyl-phosphate (KTP) Laser Prostatectomy in living dogs and compared the efficacy with that in fresh human and dog cadavers.

Randall S Kuntzman - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • high power potassium titanyl phosphate Laser vaporization Prostatectomy
    Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 1998
    Co-Authors: Randall S Kuntzman, Reza S. Malek, David M. Barrett
    Abstract:

    In a search for potential therapeutic strategies for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) that would be associated with less morbidity than transurethral resection of the prostate, various types of Laser Prostatectomy have been used. Although the neodymium: Yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Nd: YAG) Laser allows performance of Prostatectomy in an almost bloodless field and without absorption of irrigant, the remaining necrotic tissue causes bladder outlet obstruction and related symptoms for 5 to 7 days after treatment. In contrast, the potassium titanyl phosphate (KTP) Laser has been found to vaporize tissue with minimal coagulation of the underlying structures. With use of the KTP Laser, heat is concentrated into a small volume, the tissue is ablated by rapid vaporization of cellular water, and a 2-mm rim of coagulated tissue is left. After favorable results were obtained in studies of canine prostates and human cadavers, we implemented clinical use of 60-W KTP Laser Prostatectomy in selected patients. In 10 patients with symptomatic BPH who ranged in age from 52 to 80 years, outpatient KTP Laser Prostatectomy yielded significantly increased mean peak urinary flow rates (from 8.0 mL/s preoperatively to 19.4 mL/s within 24 hours after the procedure). No patient had hematuria, dysuria, or incontinence after removal of the catheter, and no patient required recatheterization. One patient, however, had urgency, and two other patients became febrile during the 24-hour observation period. Overall, KTP Laser vaporization Prostatectomy can provide immediate relief from obstructive symptoms of BPH and is not associated with dysuria.

  • high power 60 watt potassium titanyl phosphate Laser vaporization Prostatectomy in living canines and in human and canine cadavers
    Urology, 1997
    Co-Authors: Randall S Kuntzman, Reza S. Malek, David M. Barrett, David G Bostwick
    Abstract:

    Objectives We studied the safety and efficacy of 60-W potassium-titanyl-phosphate (KTP) Laser Prostatectomy in living dogs and compared the efficacy with that in fresh human and dog cadavers.

K T Foo - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • long term follow up of transurethral microwave thermotherapy
    Urology, 1999
    Co-Authors: K O Lau, K T Foo
    Abstract:

    Abstract Objectives. To evaluate the long-term results of transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with up to 5 years of follow-up at our institution. Methods. From October 1991 to November 1993, 106 patients were treated for BPH with TUMT using the Prostatron 2.0. Of the 106 patients, 64 were available for evaluation of symptoms (Madsen-Iverson score), uroflow, residual urine, and retreatment rate at a mean follow-up of 50 ± 5.4 months (mean ± SD). Results. The mean age of the patients was 65.2 ± 9.8 years. Thirty-two patients (50.0%) were treated with one session of TUMT. Additional treatments were required for 32 patients (50.0%). Three patients had two sessions of TUMT, 14 underwent transurethral resection of prostate, and 3 had Laser Prostatectomy. Twelve patients received medical therapy. The mean symptom score decreased significantly from 12.9 ± 2.5 to 5.7 ± 3.6 ( P = 0.001). The mean peak flow rates and postvoid residual volume showed little difference before and after TUMT. On the basis of the criteria described by Poincelet and Cathaud the overall clinical efficacy rate was 39.1% (15.6% complete response and 23.5% partial response). No obvious clinical parameter was useful to predict favorable outcome after TUMT. Conclusions. The present study showed that the efficacy rate of TUMT with the Prostatron 2.0 at 50 months was 39.1%. None of the preoperative clinical factors was predictive of a favorable outcome.