The Experts below are selected from a list of 104985 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Bhaskar K Somani - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
trends of urolithiasis interventions simulation and Laser Technology over the last 16 years 2000 2015 as published in the literature pubmed a systematic review from european section of uro Technology esut
World Journal of Urology, 2017Co-Authors: Amelia Pietropaolo, Silvia Proietti, R Geraghty, Andreas Skolarikos, Athanasios Papatsoris, Evangelos Liatsikos, Bhaskar K SomaniAbstract:To look at the bibliometric publication trends on ‘Urolithiasis’ and aspects of treatment and training associated with it over a period of 16 years from 2000 to 2015. To this end, we conducted this study to look at the publication trends associated with urolithiasis, including the use of simulation, Laser Technology, and all types of interventions for it. We performed a systematic review of the literature using PubMed over the last 16 years, from January 2000 to December 2015 for all published papers on ‘Urolithiasis’. While there were no language restrictions, English language articles and all non-English language papers with published English abstracts were also included. Case reports, animal and laboratory studies, and those studies that did not have a published abstract were excluded from our analysis. We also analyzed the data in two time periods, period-1 (2000–2007) and period-2 (2008–2015). During the last 16 years, a total of 5343 papers were published on ‘Urolithiasis’, including 4787 in English language and 556 in non-English language. This included papers on URS (n = 1200), PCNL (n = 1715), SWL (n = 887), open stone surgery (n = 87), laparoscopic stone surgery (n = 209), pyelolithotomy (n = 35), simulation in Endourology (n = 82), and use of Laser for stone surgery (n = 406). When comparing the two time periods, during period 2, the change was +171% (p = 0.007), +279% (p < 0.001), and −17% (p = 0.2) for URS, PCNL, and SWL, respectively. While there was a rise in laparoscopic surgery (+116%), it decreased for open stone surgery (−11%) and pyelolithotomy (−47%). A total of 82 papers have been published on simulation for stone surgery including 48 papers for URS (67% rise in period-2, p = 0.007), and 34 papers for PCNL (480% rise in period-2, p < 0.001). A rising trend for the use of Laser was also seen in period 2 (increase of 126%, p < 0.02, from 124 papers to 281 papers). Published papers on intervention for Urolithiasis have risen over the last 16 years. While there has been a steep rise of URS and minimally invasive PCNL techniques, SWL and open surgery have shown a slight decline over this period. A similar increase has also been seen for the use of simulation and Lasers in Endourology.
Athanasios Papatsoris - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
trends of urolithiasis interventions simulation and Laser Technology over the last 16 years 2000 2015 as published in the literature pubmed a systematic review from european section of uro Technology esut
World Journal of Urology, 2017Co-Authors: Amelia Pietropaolo, Silvia Proietti, R Geraghty, Andreas Skolarikos, Athanasios Papatsoris, Evangelos Liatsikos, Bhaskar K SomaniAbstract:To look at the bibliometric publication trends on ‘Urolithiasis’ and aspects of treatment and training associated with it over a period of 16 years from 2000 to 2015. To this end, we conducted this study to look at the publication trends associated with urolithiasis, including the use of simulation, Laser Technology, and all types of interventions for it. We performed a systematic review of the literature using PubMed over the last 16 years, from January 2000 to December 2015 for all published papers on ‘Urolithiasis’. While there were no language restrictions, English language articles and all non-English language papers with published English abstracts were also included. Case reports, animal and laboratory studies, and those studies that did not have a published abstract were excluded from our analysis. We also analyzed the data in two time periods, period-1 (2000–2007) and period-2 (2008–2015). During the last 16 years, a total of 5343 papers were published on ‘Urolithiasis’, including 4787 in English language and 556 in non-English language. This included papers on URS (n = 1200), PCNL (n = 1715), SWL (n = 887), open stone surgery (n = 87), laparoscopic stone surgery (n = 209), pyelolithotomy (n = 35), simulation in Endourology (n = 82), and use of Laser for stone surgery (n = 406). When comparing the two time periods, during period 2, the change was +171% (p = 0.007), +279% (p < 0.001), and −17% (p = 0.2) for URS, PCNL, and SWL, respectively. While there was a rise in laparoscopic surgery (+116%), it decreased for open stone surgery (−11%) and pyelolithotomy (−47%). A total of 82 papers have been published on simulation for stone surgery including 48 papers for URS (67% rise in period-2, p = 0.007), and 34 papers for PCNL (480% rise in period-2, p < 0.001). A rising trend for the use of Laser was also seen in period 2 (increase of 126%, p < 0.02, from 124 papers to 281 papers). Published papers on intervention for Urolithiasis have risen over the last 16 years. While there has been a steep rise of URS and minimally invasive PCNL techniques, SWL and open surgery have shown a slight decline over this period. A similar increase has also been seen for the use of simulation and Lasers in Endourology.
Mitchel P. Goldman - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
comparative evaluation of long pulse alexandrite and long pulse nd yag Laser systems used individually and in combination for axillary hair removal
Dermatologic Surgery, 2008Co-Authors: Jane G Khoury, Raminder Saluja, Mitchel P. GoldmanAbstract:BACKGROUNDThe 755-nm alexandrite and the 1,064-nm Nd:YAG Lasers are both utilized for hair removal. Advances in Laser Technology have led to the development of dual-wavelength treatment for increased efficacy.OBJECTIVEThe objective was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of combining 755- and 1,064-
Dan Z Reinstein - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
femtosecond Laser Technology in corneal refractive surgery a review
Journal of Refractive Surgery, 2012Co-Authors: George D Kymionis, Vardhaman P Kankariya, Argyro D Plaka, Dan Z ReinsteinAbstract:PURPOSE To discuss current applications and advantages of femtosecond Laser Technology over traditional manual techniques and related unique complications in corneal refractive surgical procedures, including LASIK flap creation, intracorneal ring segment implantation, astigmatic keratotomy, presbyopic treatments, and intrastromal lenticule procedures. METHODS Literature review. RESULTS From its first clinical use in 2001 for LASIK flap creation, femtosecond Lasers have steadily made a place as the dominant flap-making Technology worldwide. Newer applications are being evaluated and are increasing in their frequency of use. CONCLUSIONS Femtosecond Laser Technology is rapidly becoming a heavily utilized tool in corneal refractive surgical procedures due to its reproducibility, safety, precision, and versatility.
Nathaniel M Fried - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
recent advances in infrared Laser lithotripsy invited
Biomedical Optics Express, 2018Co-Authors: Nathaniel M FriedAbstract:The flashlamp-pumped, solid-state, pulsed, mid-infrared, holmium:YAG Laser (λ = 2120 nm) has been the clinical gold standard Laser for lithotripsy for over the past two decades. However, while the holmium Laser is the dominant Laser Technology in ureteroscopy because it efficiently ablates all urinary stone types, this mature Laser Technology has several fundamental limitations. Alternative, mid-IR Laser technologies, including a thulium fiber Laser (λ = 1908 and 1940 nm), a thulium:YAG Laser (λ = 2010 nm), and an erbium:YAG Laser (λ = 2940 nm) have also been explored for lithotripsy. The capabilities and limitations of these mid-IR Lasers are reviewed in the context of the quest for an ideal Laser lithotripsy system capable of providing both rapid and safe ablation of urinary stones.
-
advances in Laser Technology and fibre optic delivery systems in lithotripsy
Nature Reviews Urology, 2018Co-Authors: Nathaniel M Fried, Pierce B IrbyAbstract:The flashlamp-pumped, solid-state holmium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet (YAG) Laser has been the Laser of choice for use in ureteroscopic lithotripsy for the past 20 years. However, although the holmium Laser works well on all stone compositions and is cost-effective, this Technology still has several fundamental limitations. Newer Laser technologies, including the frequency-doubled, double-pulse YAG (FREDDY), erbium:YAG, femtosecond, and thulium fibre Lasers, have all been explored as potential alternatives to the holmium:YAG Laser for lithotripsy. Each of these Laser technologies is associated with technical advantages and disadvantages, and the search continues for the next generation of Laser lithotripsy systems that can provide rapid, safe, and efficient stone ablation. New fibre-optic approaches for safer and more efficient delivery of the Laser energy inside the urinary tract include the use of smaller-core fibres and fibres that are tapered, spherical, detachable or hollow steel, or have muzzle brake distal fibre-optic tips. These specialty fibres might provide advantages, including improved flexibility for maximal ureteroscope deflection, reduced cross section for increased saline irrigation rates through the working channel of the ureteroscope, reduced stone retropulsion for improved stone ablation efficiency, and reduced fibre degradation and burnback for longer fibre life.
