The Experts below are selected from a list of 3678 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Klich-kluczewska Barbara - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Commentary on biopolitics : (pro)natalist politics in the post-war women’s press
    Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku, 2019
    Co-Authors: Klich-kluczewska Barbara
    Abstract:

    The article is aimed at answering the question of how actively and effectively women’s press editors responded to the turns in Polish post-war natalist policy, and whether they tried to play an active role in the public discourse of the era. I understand biopolitics as ac- tions and strategies of Modern Dictatorship for controlling the population, among others, in the context of fertility decline, Modern birth control or practices related to motherhood and fatherhood. I analyze the frequency of publications on the subject, the formula and structure of the narratives as well as the presence of expert statements

  • Commentary on biopolitics. (Pro)natalist politics in the post-war women’s press
    Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku, 2019
    Co-Authors: Klich-kluczewska Barbara
    Abstract:

    Artykuł powstał w ramach projektu Narodowego Centrum Nauki pt. Liga Kobiet w terenie. Działalność organizacji i realia jej funkcjonowania na szczeblu regionalnym i lokalnym w rzeczywistości Polski Ludowej (1945–1989) – nr 2017/25/B/HS3/02015.The article is aimed at answering the question of how actively and effectively women’s press editors responded to the turns in Polish post-war natalist policy, and whether they tried to play an active role in the public discourse of the era. I understand biopolitics as actions and strategies of Modern Dictatorship for controlling the population, among others, in the context of fertility decline, Modern birth control or practices related to motherhood and fatherhood. I analyze the frequency of publications on the subject, the formula and structure of the narratives as well as the presence of expert statements.barbara.klich-kluczewska@uj.edu.plBarbara Klich-Kluczewska – dr hab., adiunkt w Zakładzie Antropologii Historycznej Instytutu Historii UJ. Zajmuje się dziejami polskiego powojennego społeczeństwa w ujęciu kulturowym i komparatystycznym, w szczególności historią rodziny i życia prywatnego. W praktyce badawczej koncentruje się na ujęciu mikrohistorycznym i historii przypadku. Interesuje się metodologią związaną z wykorzystaniem źródeł wizualnych, oral history oraz gender w warsztacie historycznym. Ważniejsze publikacje: Przez dziurkę od klucza. Życie prywatne w Krakowie (1945–1989) (Warszawa 2005); Rodzina, tabu i komunizm w Polsce 1956–1989 (Kraków 2015); From mentalités to anthropological history. Theory and methods (Kraków 2012).Uniwersytet Jagielloński24725

Brian Bennett - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • the last Dictatorship in europe belarus under lukashenko
    2012
    Co-Authors: Brian Bennett
    Abstract:

    An isolated country dominated by a single, ruthless leader, Belarus is Europe's last Modern Dictatorship. Despite the country's fascinating history, rich culture, and gorgeous landscape, few nonresidents travel to Belarus and take advantage of its resources, and even though the nation's people are friendly and hospitable, they nevertheless live under the constant threat of arrest. Belarus exists outside of Modern European norms, frozen in time by a tyrannical regime that fooled its citizens into thinking a new leader would grant their freedom. Instead, Alexander Lukashenko has pursued a pattern of rule as oppressive as all of those who came before him. Brian Bennett follows the history of Belarus from the collapse of the Soviet Union to the 2006 ascendance of Lukashenko. He revisits the excitement felt by many Belarussians after their first presidential election in 1994 and the cold realization that the country had returned to business as usual, as evidenced by the implementation of undemocratic referendums, fixed elections, suspicious disappearances, and the violent suppression of public opposition. Bennett concludes with a close consideration of the enigmatic Lukashenko and how his regime might one day end.

Basabe Nere - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • El bonapartismo, o la "dictadura democrática" Moderna
    'UPV EHU Press', 2021
    Co-Authors: Basabe Nere
    Abstract:

    The unusual repetition in France of two Empires that emerged from the Bonaparte dynasty throughout the 19th Century (1799-1815 and 1852-1870) gave rise to a particular ideological current and a political culture that, according to many, reaches even our days. Despite its historical specificity, though, and the difficulty of its conceptualization, Bonapartism had a series of characteristics of radical novelty: form par excellence of the Modern Dictatorship, a transit model between the former absolutist monarchies and contemporary totalitarianisms, Bonapartism presents an odd combination of political-military authoritarianism but legitimized by strong popular and plebiscitary support, which came to disrupt the typology of the classical forms of government.; La inusitada repetición en Francia de dos Imperios surgidos de la dinastía de los Bonaparte a lo largo del siglo XIX (1799-1815 y 1852-1870) dio origen a una corriente ideológica y una cultura política propia que, en opinión de muchos, alcanza incluso hasta nuestros días. Pese a su especificidad histórica y la dificultad de su conceptualización, el bonapartismo reunía una serie de características de radical novedad: forma por excelencia de la dictadura Moderna, modelo de tránsito entre las antiguas monarquías absolutistas y los totalitarismos contemporáneos, el bonapartismo se presenta así como una curiosa combinación de autoritarismo político-militar pero legitimada por un fuerte apoyo de base popular y plebiscitario, que vino a dar al traste con la tipología de las formas clásicas de gobierno

Elisa Pegorin - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • ARQUITECTURA E REGIME EM ITÁLIA E PORTUGAL. OBRAS PÚBLICAS NO FASCISMO E NO ESTADO NOVO (1928-1948)
    2019
    Co-Authors: Elisa Pegorin
    Abstract:

    ResumoA presente tese de doutoramento tem como principal objeto de investigação e análise o estudodas relações existentes entre a arquitetura italiana e a arquitetura portuguesa durante o vinténioque vai de 1928 a 1948. Do ponto de vista histórico, Itália e Portugal tiveram um contextopolítico similar, caraterizado por dois regimes ditatoriais: o de Mussolini (1922-1943) e o deSalazar (1928-1974).Em ambos os países, a produção arquitetónica financiada pelo governo - nas obras públicas -para dar resposta a uma nova reorganização do Estado, tem aspetos e caraterísticas comuns,sendo a principal a "criação" ou "invenção" de uma Modernidade nacionalista. Tendo comoponto de partida as relações políticas, diplomáticas e culturais e o impulso dado por algumasfiguras de relevo - por exemplo, António Ferro e Duarte Pacheco - emergem afinidades formaise programáticas e escolhas linguísticas que foram determinantes para designar uma arquiteturade regime.Em particular, a presente tese procura analisar e clarificar a leitura determinista feita pelahistoriografia portuguesa, ou seja, a de uma ligação com a arquitetura "fascista" proveniente deItália (e da Alemanha). Em relação ao pressuposto - até agora confirmado - de uma similitudepuramente e aparentemente formal, tentou-se identificar as ligações - quais, como e quando -entre os dois países no campo da arquitetura, sendo que esta respondia sempre a uma hegemoniapolítica. Procurou-se também esclarecer se tais ligações existiram de facto e, eventualmente,como se concretizaram nas obras públicas representativas do regime.A base da estrutura argumentativa do presente trabalho foi a de não "isolar" a arquiteturaconstruída do seu contexto político nem da sua ligação estreita com a ideologia subjacente eestruturadora das decisões relativas à construção de uma identidade e de uma memória coletivas;ou seja, de um conceito de "nacionalismo" adjetivado, respetivamente, com os termos "fascista"e "salazarista".As relações entre os arquitetos portugueses e a arquitetura Moderna italiana foram "mediadas"pelas viagens de estudo a Itália, pela difusão da arquitetura nas revistas do setor, peloscontactos diretos entre arquitetos por ocasião de exposições e congressos: um conjunto deexperiências, sucessivamente traduzidas nas obras edificadas, que demonstra que o exemploda arquitetura Moderna italiana não se limita a episódios pontuais, mas é uma evidência maisampla que implicou, sobretudo, as obras públicas, com uma linguagem reelaborada segundo a"especificidade" de cada um dos regimes. Com efeito, esta tese vai permitir evidenciar que oconjunto das relações entre a Itália e Portugal se carateriza por uma continuidade que, emboracom diferentes conjugações, atravessa o século XX na sua globalidade.AbstractThe present PhD thesis has as its main object, research and analysis, the study of the relationshipsbetween Italian and Portuguese architecture, in two decades between 1928 and 1948: from ahistorical point of view, in fact, Italy and Portugal lived a similar political context, characterizedby two dictatorial regimes, respectively, by Mussolini in Italy (1922-43) and by Salazar inPortugal (1928-74).The architectural production financed by the government - in public works - put in place by thetwo countries to respond to a new reorganization of the state, presents links and common points,where the main was the "creation" or "invention" of a nationalist Modernity. Starting frompolitical, diplomatic, and cultural relations, and from the impulse of some important figures - asAntonio Ferro and Duarte Pacheco - we can highlight some formal and programmatic affinities,as well as linguistic choices that were decisive to characterize an architecture of Dictatorship.In particular, the thesis tries to analyze and clarify a deterministic reading given by thePortuguese historiography, that is the link with a "fascist" architecture coming from Italy (andfrom Germany). Respect to this consolidated assumption - of a purely and apparently formalsimilarity, the attempt has been to clarify which, when and how these relations between the twocountries in the field of architecture have intertwined, which always responded to a hegemonypolicy. Furthermore, if these relations really existed, and - if so - how they have materialized inthe Public Works, that are representative of the regime.The central point of the argumentative structure of the present work, was not "isolating" thearchitecture built from its political context and from the close link with the underlying ideology,in the idea that the decisions werw related to the construction of an identity and a collectivememory; that is, a concept of "nationalism" declined, in the respective countries, in terms of"fascist" and "salazarist".Relations between Portuguese architects and Modern Italian architecture were "filtered" throughstudy trips in Italy, the diffusion of architecture in the magazines of the sector, direct contactsbetween architects during exhibitions and congresses: a set of facts, later translated into thebuilt works, which demonstrate how the example of Modern Italian architecture is not limitedto timely episodes but constitutes a wider affair that interested, above all, public works, with alanguage response reworked according to the "specificity" "of the two countries.In fact, it will emerge that the complex of relations between Italy and Portugal is characterizedas a continuity, which, although with different variations, goes through the entire 20th century.Keywords: Architecture; Modern; Dictatorship; Italy; Portugal; Fascism; New Stat