The Experts below are selected from a list of 7239 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Thomas R. Buckley - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
More from ecologists to support natural history Museums.
2015Co-Authors: Darren F. Ward, Richard A. B. Leschen, Thomas R. BuckleyAbstract:Schilthuizen et al. [1] recently discussed the important issue of specimens as primary data sources, and the need for ecologists, taxonomists, and natural history Museum Curators to secure baseline ecological data over the long-term. While we agree with many of the points raised, we argue that Schilthuizen et al. place too much emphasis on taxonomists and Museum Curators to solve the underlying issues. We argue that far more is needed from ecologists, especially community ecologists studying hyperdiverse groups with projects that result in large quantities of specimens.
Laloue C - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Dating of modern music instrument combining the sharpest 14 C technology and independent expertise
2018Co-Authors: Durier M.-g, Hatté C, Vaiedelich S., Gauthier C., Noury Claude, Thil F., Tisnerat-laborde N., Bruguière P, Échard J-p, Laloue CAbstract:International audienceFor dating modern music instruments dated between the 16 th and 19 th century, dendrochronology might not be carried out due to a too short tree-rings record and 14 C dating might a priori be ignored for historical periods as a 14 C physical measurement might result into several equiprobable age ranges. Several samplings and independent expertise are then required to make a well-considered choice between these intervals. Owing to the new generation of 14 C dating instruments, sampling without affecting the instrument integrity is now possible. The interdisciplinary framework allows combining any ante quem or post quem information on the age of music instruments. To illustrate this approach, we will draw on an ongoing project of modern music instruments gathering radiocarbon dating specialists and the Museum Curators. Our goal is to deepen the scientific knowledge about the origin and the long history of use and restoration of instruments kept at the Musée de la Musique. As an example, an Indian rudra-vina (E.997.24.1) was dated from the end of the 17 th century. Transcription of 14 C activity measured on two sub-samples yields four equiprobable calibrated date ranges. The comparison with a Govardhan's picturial representation of a similar rudra-vina allows to determine the most likely date range: [AD 1650-1683]. Likewise, a second example comes from a stringed Hindustani instrument named kinnari-vina (E.1444). It was supposedly dated from the 18 th century according to Musée's Curators because of its organological features. The dating, based on 7 sub-samples, has brought to light a very likely restoration of the upper-nut whereas all other components are contemporaneous of the instrument manufacturing. The results obtained allow to reveal additions or changes (successive layers of history) since they emerged from the instrument factories. The multidisciplinary approach applied here is a benefit for establishing a "history" of use and restoration of music instruments with composite constitutions
-
Radiocarbon dating application to modern musical instruments: an interdisciplinary study
2018Co-Authors: Durier M.-g, Hatté C, Vaiedelich S., Gauthier C., Thil F., Tisnerat-laborde N., Bruguière P, Échard J-p, Noury C., Laloue CAbstract:International audienceRelics dating: why not follow the example of dating of modern music instrument, combining the sharpest 14C technology and independent expertise?Dating historical relics partly meets the same issue than dating modern music instruments dated between the 16th and 19th century. For both woody relics and music instrument, dendrochronology might not be carried out due to a too short tree-rings record and 14C dating might a priori be ignored for historical periods as a 14C physical measurement might result into several equiprobable age ranges. Several samplings and independent expertise are then required to make a well-considered choice between these intervals. Owing to the new generation of 14C dating instruments, sampling without affecting the instrument or relics integrity is now possible. The interdisciplinary framework allows combining any ante quem or post quem information on the age of relics or music instruments. To illustrate this approach, we will draw on an on-going project of modern music instruments gathering radiocarbon dating specialists and the Museum Curators. Our goal is to deepen the scientific knowledge about the origin and the long history of use and restoration of instruments kept at the Musée de la musique. As an example, an Indian rudra-vina (E.997.24.1) was dated from the end of the 17th century. Transcription of 14C activity measured on two sub-samples yields four equiprobable calibrated date ranges. The comparison with a Govardhan’s picturial representation of a similar rudra-vina allows to determine the most likely date range: [AD 1650-1683]. Likewise, a second example comes from a stringed Hindustani instrument named kinnari-veena. It was supposedly dated from the 18th century according to Musée's Curators because of its organological features. The dating, based on 7 sub-samples, has brought to light a very likely restoration of the upper-nut whereas all other components are contemporaneous of the instrument manufacturing. The results obtained allow to reveal additions or changes (successive layers of history) since they emerged from the instrument factories. The relics made of wood, bones or textile can also take benefit of such a multidisciplinary approach already applied on music instruments with composite constitutions
Jennifer Barbara Jane Cave - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
heritage cultural attraction atmospherics creating the right environment for the heritage cultural visitor
2007Co-Authors: Mark A Bonn, Sacha Josephmathews, Mo Dai, Steve Hayes, Jennifer Barbara Jane CaveAbstract:The popular press is replete with articles discussing the various remodeling efforts afoot in many of the prominent heritage attractions worldwide. Undoubtedly, Museum Curators have acknowledged the tremendous role external surroundings can play in the overall experience of the heritage visitor. This study investigates the effect of some basic environmental elements on visitors to heritage sites, illustrating that the heritage attraction’s physical environment plays an important role in determining both visitors’ attitude toward the heritage attraction and future repatronage intentions, as well as their willingness to recommend the experience to friends and relatives. The study findings indicate that environmental cues can be used as a differential tool to perpetuate brand meaning and uniqueness in the minds of the consumer, thereby creating a competitive advantage for the heritage attraction.
Ana Rosa Del Aguilaobra - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
web and social media usage by Museums online value creation
2013Co-Authors: Antonio Padillamelendez, Ana Rosa Del AguilaobraAbstract:Abstract This paper contributes to the understanding of online strategies in the context of Museums as examples of cultural organisations, an underrepresented sector in the information management literature. It presents a theoretical framework for understanding the online strategies of Museums’ use of Web and social media, their sources of online value (efficiency, novelty, lock-in, complementarities) and some measurements of Internet performance, such as the Alexa Internet ranking and the number of followers of Museums in social media. This type of analysis has not been conducted before and the findings will help Museum Curators and managers of other cultural institutions to appreciate the impact of these technologies and to make better informed decisions regarding online strategies and resource allocation. In addition, the results of this research are applicable to similar organisations, such as archives and cultural exhibitions, as well as to other service organisations related to information, education and entertainment activities.
Victoria D Alexander - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
pictures at an exhibition conflicting pressures in Museums and the display of art
1996Co-Authors: Victoria D AlexanderAbstract:Organizations face pressures from their environments. When external pressures conflict with each other or with internal desires, organizational personnel face dilemmas. This article examines conflicting pressures in a setting where they are particularly salient: art Museums. Various stakeholders, notably external funders and Museum Curators, press for specific organizational outputs—that is, particular types of exhibitions. This research examines the format and content of exhibitions from large American Museums to gauge the effect of funding. The research demonstrates that funders’ importance increased between 1960 and 1986. Funder tastes are translated into exhibitions; however, Museum manager use several strategies to retain their autonomy and legitimacy.
