The Experts below are selected from a list of 5610 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Christel Lambergallardt - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
acute effects of calcium carbonate calcium citrate and potassium citrate on markers of calcium and bone metabolism in young women
British Journal of Nutrition, 2009Co-Authors: Heini Karp, Maarit E. Ketola, Christel LambergallardtAbstract:Both K and Ca supplementation may have beneficial effects on bone through separate mechanisms. K in the form of citrate or bicarbonate affects bone by neutralising the acid load caused by a high protein intake or a low intake of alkalising foods, i.e. fruits and vegetables. Ca is known to decrease serum parathyroid hormone (S-PTH) concentration and bone resorption. We compared the effects of calcium carbonate, calcium citrate and potassium citrate on markers of Ca and bone metabolism in young women. Twelve healthy women aged 22‐ 30 years were randomised into four controlled 24 h study sessions, each subject serving as her own control. At the beginning of each session, subjects received a single dose of calcium carbonate, calcium citrate, potassium citrate or a placebo in randomised order. The diet during each session was identical, containing 300 mg Ca. Both the calcium carbonate and calcium citrate supplement contained 1000 mg Ca; the potassium citrate supplement contained 2250 mg K. Markers of Ca and bone metabolism were followed. Potassium citrate decreased the bone resorption marker (N-Terminal Telopeptide of type I collagen) and increased Ca retention relative to the control session. Both Ca supplements decreased S-PTH concentration. Ca supplements also decreased bone resorption relative to the control session, but this was significant only for calcium carbonate. No differences in bone formation marker (bone-specific alkaline phosphatase) were seen among the study sessions. The results suggest that potassium citrate has a positive effect on the resorption marker despite low Ca intake. Both Ca supplements were absorbed well and decreased S-PTH efficiently. Calcium: Potassium: Acid–base homeostasis: Bone metabolism
-
increased calcium intake does not completely counteract the effects of increased phosphorus intake on bone an acute dose response study in healthy females
British Journal of Nutrition, 2008Co-Authors: Virpi Kemi, Heini Karp, Merja Karkkainen, Kalevi Laitinen, Christel LambergallardtAbstract:A high dietary P intake is suggested to have negative effects on bone through increased parathyroid hormone secretion, as high serum parathyroid hormone (S-PTH) concentration increases bone resorption. In many countries the P intake is 2- to 3-fold above dietary guidelines, whereas Ca intake is too low. This combination may not be optimal for bone health. In a previous controlled study, we found that dietary P dose-dependently increased S-PTH and bone resorption and decreased bone formation. The aim of the present study was to investigate the dose-response effects of Ca intake on Ca and bone metabolism with a dietary P intake higher than recommended. Each of the twelve healthy female subjects aged 21-40 years attended three 24-h study sessions, which were randomized with regard to a Ca dose of 0 (control day), 600 or 1200 mg, and each subject served as her own control. The meals on each study day provided 1850 mg P and 480 mg Ca. S-PTH concentration decreased (P < 0.001) and serum ionized Ca concentration increased (P < 0.001) with increasing Ca doses. The bone formation marker, serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, did not differ significantly (P = 0.4). By contrast, the bone resorption marker, urinary N-Terminal Telopeptide of collagen type I, decreased significantly with both Ca doses (P = 0.008). When P intake was above current recommendations, increased Ca intake was beneficial for bone, as indicated by decreased S-PTH concentration and bone resorption. However, not even a high Ca intake could affect bone formation when P intake was excessive.
-
high phosphorus intakes acutely and negatively affect ca and bone metabolism in a dose dependent manner in healthy young females
British Journal of Nutrition, 2006Co-Authors: Virpi Kemi, Merja Karkkainen, Christel LambergallardtAbstract:Ca and P are both essential nutrients for bone and are known to affect one of the most important regulators of bone metabolism, parathyroid hormone (PTH). Too ample a P intake, typical of Western diets, could be deleterious to bone through the increased PTH secretion. Few controlled dose-response studies are available on the effects of high P intake in man. We studied the short-term effects of four P doses on Ca and bone metabolism in fourteen healthy women, 20-28 years of age, who were randomized to four controlled study days; thus each study subject served as her own control. P supplement doses of 0 (placebo), 250, 750 or 1500 mg were taken, divided into three doses during the study day. The meals served were exactly the same during each study day and provided 495 mg P and 250 mg Ca. The P doses affected the serum PTH (S-PTH) in a dose-dependent manner (P=0.0005). There was a decrease in serum ionized Ca concentration only in the highest P dose (P=0.004). The marker of bone formation, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, decreased (P=0.05) and the bone resorption marker, N-Terminal Telopeptide of collagen type I, increased in response to the P doses (P=0.05). This controlled dose-response study showed that P has a dose-dependent effect on S-PTH and increases PTH secretion significantly when Ca intake is low. Acutely high P intake adversely affects bone metabolism by decreasing bone formation and increasing bone resorption, as indicated by the bone metabolism markers.
Heini Karp - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
acute effects of calcium carbonate calcium citrate and potassium citrate on markers of calcium and bone metabolism in young women
British Journal of Nutrition, 2009Co-Authors: Heini Karp, Maarit E. Ketola, Christel LambergallardtAbstract:Both K and Ca supplementation may have beneficial effects on bone through separate mechanisms. K in the form of citrate or bicarbonate affects bone by neutralising the acid load caused by a high protein intake or a low intake of alkalising foods, i.e. fruits and vegetables. Ca is known to decrease serum parathyroid hormone (S-PTH) concentration and bone resorption. We compared the effects of calcium carbonate, calcium citrate and potassium citrate on markers of Ca and bone metabolism in young women. Twelve healthy women aged 22‐ 30 years were randomised into four controlled 24 h study sessions, each subject serving as her own control. At the beginning of each session, subjects received a single dose of calcium carbonate, calcium citrate, potassium citrate or a placebo in randomised order. The diet during each session was identical, containing 300 mg Ca. Both the calcium carbonate and calcium citrate supplement contained 1000 mg Ca; the potassium citrate supplement contained 2250 mg K. Markers of Ca and bone metabolism were followed. Potassium citrate decreased the bone resorption marker (N-Terminal Telopeptide of type I collagen) and increased Ca retention relative to the control session. Both Ca supplements decreased S-PTH concentration. Ca supplements also decreased bone resorption relative to the control session, but this was significant only for calcium carbonate. No differences in bone formation marker (bone-specific alkaline phosphatase) were seen among the study sessions. The results suggest that potassium citrate has a positive effect on the resorption marker despite low Ca intake. Both Ca supplements were absorbed well and decreased S-PTH efficiently. Calcium: Potassium: Acid–base homeostasis: Bone metabolism
-
Acute effects of calcium carbonate, calcium citrate and potassium citrate on markers of calcium and bone metabolism in young women
The British journal of nutrition, 2009Co-Authors: Heini Karp, Maarit E. Ketola, Christel Lamberg-allardtAbstract:Both K and Ca supplementation may have beneficial effects on bone through separate mechanisms. K in the form of citrate or bicarbonate affects bone by neutralising the acid load caused by a high protein intake or a low intake of alkalising foods, i.e. fruits and vegetables. Ca is known to decrease serum parathyroid hormone (S-PTH) concentration and bone resorption. We compared the effects of calcium carbonate, calcium citrate and potassium citrate on markers of Ca and bone metabolism in young women. Twelve healthy women aged 22-30 years were randomised into four controlled 24 h study sessions, each subject serving as her own control. At the beginning of each session, subjects received a single dose of calcium carbonate, calcium citrate, potassium citrate or a placebo in randomised order. The diet during each session was identical, containing 300 mg Ca. Both the calcium carbonate and calcium citrate supplement contained 1000 mg Ca; the potassium citrate supplement contained 2250 mg K. Markers of Ca and bone metabolism were followed. Potassium citrate decreased the bone resorption marker (N-Terminal Telopeptide of type I collagen) and increased Ca retention relative to the control session. Both Ca supplements decreased S-PTH concentration. Ca supplements also decreased bone resorption relative to the control session, but this was significant only for calcium carbonate. No differences in bone formation marker (bone-specific alkaline phosphatase) were seen among the study sessions. The results suggest that potassium citrate has a positive effect on the resorption marker despite low Ca intake. Both Ca supplements were absorbed well and decreased S-PTH efficiently.
-
increased calcium intake does not completely counteract the effects of increased phosphorus intake on bone an acute dose response study in healthy females
British Journal of Nutrition, 2008Co-Authors: Virpi Kemi, Heini Karp, Merja Karkkainen, Kalevi Laitinen, Christel LambergallardtAbstract:A high dietary P intake is suggested to have negative effects on bone through increased parathyroid hormone secretion, as high serum parathyroid hormone (S-PTH) concentration increases bone resorption. In many countries the P intake is 2- to 3-fold above dietary guidelines, whereas Ca intake is too low. This combination may not be optimal for bone health. In a previous controlled study, we found that dietary P dose-dependently increased S-PTH and bone resorption and decreased bone formation. The aim of the present study was to investigate the dose-response effects of Ca intake on Ca and bone metabolism with a dietary P intake higher than recommended. Each of the twelve healthy female subjects aged 21-40 years attended three 24-h study sessions, which were randomized with regard to a Ca dose of 0 (control day), 600 or 1200 mg, and each subject served as her own control. The meals on each study day provided 1850 mg P and 480 mg Ca. S-PTH concentration decreased (P < 0.001) and serum ionized Ca concentration increased (P < 0.001) with increasing Ca doses. The bone formation marker, serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, did not differ significantly (P = 0.4). By contrast, the bone resorption marker, urinary N-Terminal Telopeptide of collagen type I, decreased significantly with both Ca doses (P = 0.008). When P intake was above current recommendations, increased Ca intake was beneficial for bone, as indicated by decreased S-PTH concentration and bone resorption. However, not even a high Ca intake could affect bone formation when P intake was excessive.
Christel Lamberg-allardt - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Acute effects of calcium carbonate, calcium citrate and potassium citrate on markers of calcium and bone metabolism in young women
The British journal of nutrition, 2009Co-Authors: Heini Karp, Maarit E. Ketola, Christel Lamberg-allardtAbstract:Both K and Ca supplementation may have beneficial effects on bone through separate mechanisms. K in the form of citrate or bicarbonate affects bone by neutralising the acid load caused by a high protein intake or a low intake of alkalising foods, i.e. fruits and vegetables. Ca is known to decrease serum parathyroid hormone (S-PTH) concentration and bone resorption. We compared the effects of calcium carbonate, calcium citrate and potassium citrate on markers of Ca and bone metabolism in young women. Twelve healthy women aged 22-30 years were randomised into four controlled 24 h study sessions, each subject serving as her own control. At the beginning of each session, subjects received a single dose of calcium carbonate, calcium citrate, potassium citrate or a placebo in randomised order. The diet during each session was identical, containing 300 mg Ca. Both the calcium carbonate and calcium citrate supplement contained 1000 mg Ca; the potassium citrate supplement contained 2250 mg K. Markers of Ca and bone metabolism were followed. Potassium citrate decreased the bone resorption marker (N-Terminal Telopeptide of type I collagen) and increased Ca retention relative to the control session. Both Ca supplements decreased S-PTH concentration. Ca supplements also decreased bone resorption relative to the control session, but this was significant only for calcium carbonate. No differences in bone formation marker (bone-specific alkaline phosphatase) were seen among the study sessions. The results suggest that potassium citrate has a positive effect on the resorption marker despite low Ca intake. Both Ca supplements were absorbed well and decreased S-PTH efficiently.
Maarit E. Ketola - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
acute effects of calcium carbonate calcium citrate and potassium citrate on markers of calcium and bone metabolism in young women
British Journal of Nutrition, 2009Co-Authors: Heini Karp, Maarit E. Ketola, Christel LambergallardtAbstract:Both K and Ca supplementation may have beneficial effects on bone through separate mechanisms. K in the form of citrate or bicarbonate affects bone by neutralising the acid load caused by a high protein intake or a low intake of alkalising foods, i.e. fruits and vegetables. Ca is known to decrease serum parathyroid hormone (S-PTH) concentration and bone resorption. We compared the effects of calcium carbonate, calcium citrate and potassium citrate on markers of Ca and bone metabolism in young women. Twelve healthy women aged 22‐ 30 years were randomised into four controlled 24 h study sessions, each subject serving as her own control. At the beginning of each session, subjects received a single dose of calcium carbonate, calcium citrate, potassium citrate or a placebo in randomised order. The diet during each session was identical, containing 300 mg Ca. Both the calcium carbonate and calcium citrate supplement contained 1000 mg Ca; the potassium citrate supplement contained 2250 mg K. Markers of Ca and bone metabolism were followed. Potassium citrate decreased the bone resorption marker (N-Terminal Telopeptide of type I collagen) and increased Ca retention relative to the control session. Both Ca supplements decreased S-PTH concentration. Ca supplements also decreased bone resorption relative to the control session, but this was significant only for calcium carbonate. No differences in bone formation marker (bone-specific alkaline phosphatase) were seen among the study sessions. The results suggest that potassium citrate has a positive effect on the resorption marker despite low Ca intake. Both Ca supplements were absorbed well and decreased S-PTH efficiently. Calcium: Potassium: Acid–base homeostasis: Bone metabolism
-
Acute effects of calcium carbonate, calcium citrate and potassium citrate on markers of calcium and bone metabolism in young women
The British journal of nutrition, 2009Co-Authors: Heini Karp, Maarit E. Ketola, Christel Lamberg-allardtAbstract:Both K and Ca supplementation may have beneficial effects on bone through separate mechanisms. K in the form of citrate or bicarbonate affects bone by neutralising the acid load caused by a high protein intake or a low intake of alkalising foods, i.e. fruits and vegetables. Ca is known to decrease serum parathyroid hormone (S-PTH) concentration and bone resorption. We compared the effects of calcium carbonate, calcium citrate and potassium citrate on markers of Ca and bone metabolism in young women. Twelve healthy women aged 22-30 years were randomised into four controlled 24 h study sessions, each subject serving as her own control. At the beginning of each session, subjects received a single dose of calcium carbonate, calcium citrate, potassium citrate or a placebo in randomised order. The diet during each session was identical, containing 300 mg Ca. Both the calcium carbonate and calcium citrate supplement contained 1000 mg Ca; the potassium citrate supplement contained 2250 mg K. Markers of Ca and bone metabolism were followed. Potassium citrate decreased the bone resorption marker (N-Terminal Telopeptide of type I collagen) and increased Ca retention relative to the control session. Both Ca supplements decreased S-PTH concentration. Ca supplements also decreased bone resorption relative to the control session, but this was significant only for calcium carbonate. No differences in bone formation marker (bone-specific alkaline phosphatase) were seen among the study sessions. The results suggest that potassium citrate has a positive effect on the resorption marker despite low Ca intake. Both Ca supplements were absorbed well and decreased S-PTH efficiently.
Hidekazu Suzuki - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
clinical significance of the serum crosslinked n Telopeptide of type i collagen as a prognostic marker for non small cell lung cancer
Clinical Lung Cancer, 2013Co-Authors: Motohiro Tamiya, Masashi Kobayashi, Naoko Morishita, Tomomi Yasue, Osamu Morimura, Takashi Nakasuji, Morita Satomu, Okafuji Kohei, Shiroyama Takayuki, Hidekazu SuzukiAbstract:Abstract Introduction Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death. Many patients with lung cancer are in its advanced stages at the time of diagnosis. The 5-year survival rate for lung cancer is 10% to 20%, and the prognosis for patients with lung cancer is still poor. The crosslinked N-Terminal Telopeptide of type I collagen (NTx) is a metabolite of type I collagen, the main constituent of bone matrix. Patients and Methods We measured serum NTx levels in patients who underwent staging during hospitalization for the initial treatment of lung cancer in our department. We examined whether serum NTx levels would be relevant to the prognosis of non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Results This study included 176 patients with lung cancer (125 men and 51 women), including 109 with adenocarcinoma, 53 with squamous cell carcinoma, 6 with large-cell carcinoma, and 8 with other cancer types. Univariate and multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model revealed a particularly close association between sex, performance status, disease stage, and serum NTx levels and overall survival (OS). A median OS of 368 days was observed for patients with a serum NTx level P = .00037). Conclusions We have revealed that a high serum NTx level (> 22 nmol BCE/L) appears to be a risk factor for a reduction in OS in patients with NSCLC.
-
usefulness of the serum cross linked n Telopeptide of type i collagen as a marker of bone metastasis from lung cancer
Medical Oncology, 2012Co-Authors: Motohiro Tamiya, Hidekazu Suzuki, Masashi Kobayashi, Shinji Sasada, Norio Okamoto, Naoko Morishita, Tomomi Yasue, Yuka Matsuura, Tomonori Hirashima, Ichiro KawaseAbstract:Bone metastasis is an important factor for determining the appropriate treatment for patients with lung cancer. The cross-linked N-Terminal Telopeptide of type I collagen (NTx) is a metabolite of type I collagen, the main constituent of the bone matrix. Urinary NTx is recognized as a useful marker of bone metastasis, but the application of serum NTx and its cutoff value for determining bone metastasis from lung cancer have not been characterized. We measured serum NTx by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay of individuals who underwent staging during hospitalization for initial treatment of lung cancer in our department and compared the NTx levels with the presence of bone metastasis in staging. The study included 166 patients with lung cancer (128 men and 38 women), including 85 adenocarcinoma, 42 squamous cell carcinoma, 32 small-cell carcinoma, and 7 other cancer types. Bone metastasis was present in 73 cases. The average/median serum NTx of bone metastasis (+) and bone metastasis (-) was 27.8/23.8 and 17.1/16.5 nmol bone collagen equivalents/L, respectively. There was an intentional difference with P < 0.001. The cutoff value of the serum NTx level indicating bone metastasis from lung cancer was estimated using the receiver operating characteristics curve. The optimal cutoff value was found to be 22.0 (sensitivity: 61.6%, specificity: 89.2%). The results of univariate and multivariate analysis revealed that the serum NTx levels were significantly related to bone metastasis from lung cancer (P < 0.001). Measurement of serum NTx levels provides a simple diagnostic marker of bone metastasis from lung cancer.
