The Experts below are selected from a list of 84 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
V V Estrin - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
comparative study of the effects of combined Neuroleptanalgesia and epidural anesthesia on lipid peroxidation
Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology, 1990Co-Authors: M A Diagilev, N N Kraĭnova, V V EstrinAbstract:: A comparative study of the impact of Neuroleptanalgesia (NLA) and epidural anesthesia on lipid peroxidation (LPO) in the blood plasma and erythrocyte membranes has demonstrated that NLA has a more marked inhibitory effect on LPO. This type of anesthesia is characterized by effective protection of erythrocyte membranes, with intraoperative hemodynamic effects less expressed.
Sabine B R Kastner - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
nociceptive thermal threshold testing in horses effect of neuroleptic sedation and Neuroleptanalgesia at different stimulation sites
BMC Veterinary Research, 2013Co-Authors: Christin Poller, Klaus Hopster, Karl Rohn, Sabine B R KastnerAbstract:Background: Aim of the study was to compare the effect of neuroleptic sedation with acepromazine and Neuroleptanalgesia with acepromazine and buprenorphine on thermal thresholds (TT) obtained at the nostrils and at the withers. The study was carried out as a randomized, blinded, controlled trial with cross-over design. Thermal thresholds were determined by incremental contact heat applied to the skin above the nostril (N) or the withers (W). Eleven horses were treated with saline (S), acepromazine (0.05 mg/kg) (ACE) or acepromazine and buprenorphine (0.0075 mg/kg) (AB) intravenously (IV). Single stimulations were performed 15 minutes prior and 15, 45, 75, 105, 165, 225, 285, 405 and 525 minutes after treatment. Sedation score, gastrointestinal auscultation score and occurrence of skin lesions were recorded. Data were analysed with analysis of variance for repeated measurements. Results: There were no significant differences in TT between N and W with all treatments. The TT remained constant after S and there was no difference in TT between S and ACE. After AB there was a significant increase above baseline in TT until 405 minutes after treatment. Restlessness occurred 30–90 minutes after AB in 7 horses. All horses had reduced to absent borborygmi after AB administration for 165 to 495 minutes. Conclusion: Thermal stimulation at both described body areas gives comparable results in the assessment of cutaneous anti-nociception in horses. There is no differential influence of neuroleptic sedation or Neuroleptanalgesia on TTs obtained at N or W. Buprenorphine combined with acepromazine has a long lasting anti-nociceptive effect associated with the typical opioid induced side effects in horses.
-
Nociceptive thermal threshold testing in horses – effect of neuroleptic sedation and Neuroleptanalgesia at different stimulation sites
BMC Veterinary Research, 2013Co-Authors: Christin Poller, Klaus Hopster, Karl Rohn, Sabine B R KastnerAbstract:Background: Aim of the study was to compare the effect of neuroleptic sedation with acepromazine and Neuroleptanalgesia with acepromazine and buprenorphine on thermal thresholds (TT) obtained at the nostrils and at the withers. The study was carried out as a randomized, blinded, controlled trial with cross-over design. Thermal thresholds were determined by incremental contact heat applied to the skin above the nostril (N) or the withers (W). Eleven horses were treated with saline (S), acepromazine (0.05 mg/kg) (ACE) or acepromazine and buprenorphine (0.0075 mg/kg) (AB) intravenously (IV). Single stimulations were performed 15 minutes prior and 15, 45, 75, 105, 165, 225, 285, 405 and 525 minutes after treatment. Sedation score, gastrointestinal auscultation score and occurrence of skin lesions were recorded. Data were analysed with analysis of variance for repeated measurements. Results: There were no significant differences in TT between N and W with all treatments. The TT remained constant after S and there was no difference in TT between S and ACE. After AB there was a significant increase above baseline in TT until 405 minutes after treatment. Restlessness occurred 30–90 minutes after AB in 7 horses. All horses had reduced to absent borborygmi after AB administration for 165 to 495 minutes. Conclusion: Thermal stimulation at both described body areas gives comparable results in the assessment of cutaneous anti-nociception in horses. There is no differential influence of neuroleptic sedation or Neuroleptanalgesia on TTs obtained at N or W. Buprenorphine combined with acepromazine has a long lasting anti-nociceptive effect associated with the typical opioid induced side effects in horses.
S Ribarov - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
lipid peroxidation in rat lung induced by Neuroleptanalgesia and its components
European Journal of Anaesthesiology, 1998Co-Authors: S Chinev, R Bakalova, S Kovacheva, S RibarovAbstract:: The aim of the present work was to determine the likelihood of lipid peroxidation in the lungs of rats subjected to Neuroleptanalgesia and its components. In particular, the effect of fentanyl, droperidol, a nitrous oxide/oxygen mixture when used separately or in combination, on the lung level of lipid peroxidation was investigated. The in vitro antioxidant properties of fentanyl and droperidol were also tested. Lipid peroxidation was evidenced by the endogenously generated conjugated dienes and fluorescent products of lipid peroxidation and the decrease in lung vitamin E content. It was found that fentanyl and droperidol, used separately or in combination, did not induce lipid peroxidation in the rat lung, while the exposure of rats for 120 min to a nitrous oxide/oxygen mixture (2:1 v/v) led to well-expressed peroxidation. The (N2O + O2)-pro-oxidant action was significantly inhibited in rats previously injected with fentanyl and/or droperidol. The results show that the application of fentanyl, droperidol and (N2O + O2), as in Neuroleptanalgesia, ensures minimal lipid peroxidation in the lung. In addition, we found that fentanyl and droperidol were able to inhibit the Fe(2+)-catalysed lipid peroxidation in lung homogenate. We speculate that the inhibitory effect of fentanyl and/or droperidol on the (N2O + O2)-induced lipid peroxidation in the rat lung may be caused directly by their antioxidant properties. However, another explanation seems to be possible. The free radicals that are produced during the metabolism of fentanyl and droperidol may react with the radicals generated during the one-electron reduction of nitrous oxide. Such reactions will obviously reduce the free radical concentration in the organism and, hence, the likelihood of initiating lipid peroxidation.
M A Diagilev - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
comparative study of the effects of combined Neuroleptanalgesia and epidural anesthesia on lipid peroxidation
Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology, 1990Co-Authors: M A Diagilev, N N Kraĭnova, V V EstrinAbstract:: A comparative study of the impact of Neuroleptanalgesia (NLA) and epidural anesthesia on lipid peroxidation (LPO) in the blood plasma and erythrocyte membranes has demonstrated that NLA has a more marked inhibitory effect on LPO. This type of anesthesia is characterized by effective protection of erythrocyte membranes, with intraoperative hemodynamic effects less expressed.
Christin Poller - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
nociceptive thermal threshold testing in horses effect of neuroleptic sedation and Neuroleptanalgesia at different stimulation sites
BMC Veterinary Research, 2013Co-Authors: Christin Poller, Klaus Hopster, Karl Rohn, Sabine B R KastnerAbstract:Background: Aim of the study was to compare the effect of neuroleptic sedation with acepromazine and Neuroleptanalgesia with acepromazine and buprenorphine on thermal thresholds (TT) obtained at the nostrils and at the withers. The study was carried out as a randomized, blinded, controlled trial with cross-over design. Thermal thresholds were determined by incremental contact heat applied to the skin above the nostril (N) or the withers (W). Eleven horses were treated with saline (S), acepromazine (0.05 mg/kg) (ACE) or acepromazine and buprenorphine (0.0075 mg/kg) (AB) intravenously (IV). Single stimulations were performed 15 minutes prior and 15, 45, 75, 105, 165, 225, 285, 405 and 525 minutes after treatment. Sedation score, gastrointestinal auscultation score and occurrence of skin lesions were recorded. Data were analysed with analysis of variance for repeated measurements. Results: There were no significant differences in TT between N and W with all treatments. The TT remained constant after S and there was no difference in TT between S and ACE. After AB there was a significant increase above baseline in TT until 405 minutes after treatment. Restlessness occurred 30–90 minutes after AB in 7 horses. All horses had reduced to absent borborygmi after AB administration for 165 to 495 minutes. Conclusion: Thermal stimulation at both described body areas gives comparable results in the assessment of cutaneous anti-nociception in horses. There is no differential influence of neuroleptic sedation or Neuroleptanalgesia on TTs obtained at N or W. Buprenorphine combined with acepromazine has a long lasting anti-nociceptive effect associated with the typical opioid induced side effects in horses.
-
Nociceptive thermal threshold testing in horses – effect of neuroleptic sedation and Neuroleptanalgesia at different stimulation sites
BMC Veterinary Research, 2013Co-Authors: Christin Poller, Klaus Hopster, Karl Rohn, Sabine B R KastnerAbstract:Background: Aim of the study was to compare the effect of neuroleptic sedation with acepromazine and Neuroleptanalgesia with acepromazine and buprenorphine on thermal thresholds (TT) obtained at the nostrils and at the withers. The study was carried out as a randomized, blinded, controlled trial with cross-over design. Thermal thresholds were determined by incremental contact heat applied to the skin above the nostril (N) or the withers (W). Eleven horses were treated with saline (S), acepromazine (0.05 mg/kg) (ACE) or acepromazine and buprenorphine (0.0075 mg/kg) (AB) intravenously (IV). Single stimulations were performed 15 minutes prior and 15, 45, 75, 105, 165, 225, 285, 405 and 525 minutes after treatment. Sedation score, gastrointestinal auscultation score and occurrence of skin lesions were recorded. Data were analysed with analysis of variance for repeated measurements. Results: There were no significant differences in TT between N and W with all treatments. The TT remained constant after S and there was no difference in TT between S and ACE. After AB there was a significant increase above baseline in TT until 405 minutes after treatment. Restlessness occurred 30–90 minutes after AB in 7 horses. All horses had reduced to absent borborygmi after AB administration for 165 to 495 minutes. Conclusion: Thermal stimulation at both described body areas gives comparable results in the assessment of cutaneous anti-nociception in horses. There is no differential influence of neuroleptic sedation or Neuroleptanalgesia on TTs obtained at N or W. Buprenorphine combined with acepromazine has a long lasting anti-nociceptive effect associated with the typical opioid induced side effects in horses.