The Experts below are selected from a list of 24 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Samuel S Epstein - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
american cancer society the world s wealthiest Nonprofit Institution
International Journal of Health Services, 1999Co-Authors: Samuel S EpsteinAbstract:The American Cancer Society is fixated on damage control–diagnosis and treatment–and basic molecular biology, with indifference or even hostility to cancer prevention. This myopic mindset is compou...
Davies Iain - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Navigating relative invariance: perspectives on corporate heritage identity and organizational heritage identity in an evolving Nonprofit Institution
'Elsevier BV', 2021Co-Authors: Lee Zoe, Davies IainAbstract:The notion of relative invariance is highlighted as a foundational principle in how corporate heritage identity traits can remain the same, yet change in meaning over time. Yet, little is published regarding how this notion manifests, or how corporate heritage stewards manage it in identity challenging situations. Utilizing a case study of one of the UK’s oldest cancer charities, we highlight how two groups of protagonists – heritage defenders and service innovators – shape the meaning of corporate heritage identity over time. We explore four core tensions that expose the multifaceted and complex nature of relative invariance and identify specific integration and compartmentalization strategies utilized to restore balance, allowing for the continued meaningfulness of corporate heritage identity. Overall, our study advances the notion of relative invariance, providing a more complete understanding of stewards’ affinity toward corporate heritage and extending the field of corporate heritage identity into the Nonprofit sector
Lee Zoe - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Navigating relative invariance: perspectives on corporate heritage identity and organizational heritage identity in an evolving Nonprofit Institution
'Elsevier BV', 2021Co-Authors: Lee Zoe, Davies IainAbstract:The notion of relative invariance is highlighted as a foundational principle in how corporate heritage identity traits can remain the same, yet change in meaning over time. Yet, little is published regarding how this notion manifests, or how corporate heritage stewards manage it in identity challenging situations. Utilizing a case study of one of the UK’s oldest cancer charities, we highlight how two groups of protagonists – heritage defenders and service innovators – shape the meaning of corporate heritage identity over time. We explore four core tensions that expose the multifaceted and complex nature of relative invariance and identify specific integration and compartmentalization strategies utilized to restore balance, allowing for the continued meaningfulness of corporate heritage identity. Overall, our study advances the notion of relative invariance, providing a more complete understanding of stewards’ affinity toward corporate heritage and extending the field of corporate heritage identity into the Nonprofit sector
Friyanti, Yunida Een - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Laporan Keuangan Lembaga Kemanusiaan Merujuk Pada PSAK 109 (Sebagai Kajian Untuk Laporan Keuangan Lembaga Nirlaba Syariah)
'Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Bengkulu', 2017Co-Authors: Friyanti, Yunida EenAbstract:The development of sharia in Indonesia is not only followed by the Islamic financial Institutions, but also began ogled by Nonprofit organizations. Some humanitarian organizations are also changing its financial statements following the Islamic financial statements, such as Lembaga Amil Zakat has changed into Nonprofit financial Institution and used SFAS 109 as reference for financial statements, because there is no special provision for Sharia Nonprofit Institution. In this article, the author tries to analyze changes in the financial statements which is using the system of Amil Zakat financial statements, and the possibility to do and is able to reflect the activities of the Institution instead of Amil Zakat. As a result, the change in reporting format of SFAS 45 and SFAS 109 conducted by the Foundation for Fast Action Response not fully accurate as it needs confirmation on the Foundation certificate in order to purely applying SFAS 109. And the Financial Statements based on SFAS 109 is able to explain the activity of Institutions rather than using the SFAS 45 the Foundation for Fast Action Response. It is expected to be input for the report of sharia-profit Institution
Mitchell J Nathanson - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
hospital corporate negligence enforcing the hospital s role of administrator
Tort and Insurance Law Journal, 1993Co-Authors: Mitchell J NathansonAbstract:The criteria a prospective patient uses to select a health care provider has undergone a major change in the latter part of the twentieth century. Historically, a patient looked to his or her physician as a sole health care provider. Today, a prospective patient often looks to the hospital (once considered merely the building housing the physician's equipment and medical supplies) as the entity providing the health care. The law has been slow to adapt to this shift in perception, but it is starting to re spond. However, the law in this area, like almost everything undergoing a metamor phosis, is experiencing growing pains. Because of the many advances in medical technology in the last fifty years, often it is not possible or desirable for a patient to receive treatment by a single physician. Care of the modern patient may require consultations and treatment by a variety of specialists. Accordingly, a hospital's role in coordinating the total health care of its patients has increased dramatically, leading to public reliance upon it as the actual health care provider. To conform with this increased role, the law has imposed in creased corporate liability for the medical care administered within hospital walls. The initial step in this progression occurred with the abolishment of charitable immunity, permitting recovery against a hospital for the acts of its agents (most com monly its residents and nursing staff) despite its status as a Nonprofit Institution.1 Even though a hospital could then be held liable for acts of negligence that occurred within its walls, the decision was not premised upon a recognition of the hospital's increased role in the medical care of its patients. Instead, charitable immunity was
