The Experts below are selected from a list of 285 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Susana Evangelista Leones - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Agrarian Reform and Philippine Political Development Agrarian Reform and Philippine Political Development
    2011
    Co-Authors: Frede Moreno, Susana Evangelista Leones
    Abstract:

    For about sixty-five years, the problem of landownership and control of resources continue to be a Political Development issue in the Philippines—between the wealthy landlords and the poor and landless farmworkers. Agrarian reform is viewed as a necessary condition for agricultural modernization and rural industrialization and the fundamental mooring for global competition. After 12 years of implementing the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program (CARP) in the Philippines, the Department of Agrarian Reform and the Department of Environment and Natural Resources have redistributed 5.33 million hectares of land that account for 53.4 percent of the total farmland. This accomplishment represents 66 percent of the total CARP scope. About 3.1 million rural poor households, who constitute about forty-two percent of the total agricultural population, have directly benefited from the land redistribution. Agrarian Reform has contributed to improvement of the socioeconomic conditions of landless farmers and Political Development of the Philippines in terms of engaging the landless in the process of policy making and distribution of large private landholdings to the landless. The various modalities that give peasants a stake in society such as decisive role in agrarian legislations, engaging them in dialogue to resolve agrarian cases, presenting manifesto pinpointing their criticisms and recommendations on implementing rules and guidelines, identification of farmer beneficiaries and lands to be covered, negotiation on the mode of land acquisition and distribution and computation of land values, have significantly influence the process of democratization and establishment of participatory institutions at the local and national levels. 1 CESO III and Director IV, Bureau of Agrarian Reform Beneficiaries Development (BARD), Department of Agrarian Reform (DAR), Diliman, Quezon City, Philippines. She finished her Master of Science in Community Development (MSCD) from the University of the Philippines in 1986 and Master of Development Management (MDM) from the Asian Institute of Management (AIM) in 1996. She is currently taking up Doctor of Public Administration (DPA) at the National College of Public Administration and Governance, University of the Philippines, Diliman, Quezon City. 2 Research and Development Consultant, International Technology Management Corporation (INTEM) and Professor, Western Mindanao State University, Zamboanga City, Philippines. He finished his Doctorate in Public Administration (DPA) at the National College of Public Administration and Governance, University of the Philippines (UP-NCPAG), Diliman, Quezon City in 2004.

  • Agrarian Reform and Philippine Political Development
    SSRN Electronic Journal, 2011
    Co-Authors: Frede Moreno, Susana Evangelista Leones
    Abstract:

    For about sixty-five years, the problem of landownership and control of resources continue to be a Political Development issue in the Philippines - between the wealthy landlords and the poor and landless farmworkers. Agrarian reform is viewed as a necessary condition for agricultural modernization and rural industrialization and the fundamental mooring for global competition. After 12 years of implementing the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program (CARP) in the Philippines, the Department of Agrarian Reform and the Department of Environment and Natural Resources have redistributed 5.33 million hectares of land that account for 53.4 percent of the total farmland. This accomplishment represents 66 percent of the total CARP scope. About 3.1 million rural poor households, who constitute about forty-two percent of the total agricultural population, have directly benefited from the land redistribution. Agrarian Reform has contributed to improvement of the socio-economic conditions of landless farmers and Political Development of the Philippines in terms of engaging the landless in the process of policy making and distribution of large private landholdings to the landless. The various modalities that give peasants a stake in society such as decisive role in agrarian legislations, engaging them in dialogue to resolve agrarian cases, presenting manifesto pinpointing their criticisms and recommendations on implementing rules and guidelines, identification of farmer beneficiaries and lands to be covered, negotiation on the mode of land acquisition and distribution and computation of land values, have significantly influence the process of democratization and establishment of participatory institutions at the local and national levels.

Chen Wen-xin - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Political Resources:Internal Cornerstone of Political Development
    Journal of Shantou University, 2008
    Co-Authors: Chen Wen-xin
    Abstract:

    Political resources are the premise and basis for Political Development and Political modernization. Political Development is not only a process of Political resources consumption, but also a process of the allocation of resources. The allocation of Political resources influences Political stability,thus often different Political configurations are formulated. Different stages of the Chinese Political Development need correspondingly different styles of allocation of Political resources.

  • Political Resources and Political Development
    2008
    Co-Authors: Chen Wen-xin
    Abstract:

    Political resources are the precondition and foundation of initializing and promoting Political modernization. Political Development is not only a process of consuming Political resources, but also a process of collating Political resources, which bear on Political stability. Different collocations of Political resources often lead to different Political forms. China must adopt corresponding Political resources collocations to go with its different stages of Political Development.

Frede Moreno - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Agrarian Reform and Philippine Political Development Agrarian Reform and Philippine Political Development
    2011
    Co-Authors: Frede Moreno, Susana Evangelista Leones
    Abstract:

    For about sixty-five years, the problem of landownership and control of resources continue to be a Political Development issue in the Philippines—between the wealthy landlords and the poor and landless farmworkers. Agrarian reform is viewed as a necessary condition for agricultural modernization and rural industrialization and the fundamental mooring for global competition. After 12 years of implementing the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program (CARP) in the Philippines, the Department of Agrarian Reform and the Department of Environment and Natural Resources have redistributed 5.33 million hectares of land that account for 53.4 percent of the total farmland. This accomplishment represents 66 percent of the total CARP scope. About 3.1 million rural poor households, who constitute about forty-two percent of the total agricultural population, have directly benefited from the land redistribution. Agrarian Reform has contributed to improvement of the socioeconomic conditions of landless farmers and Political Development of the Philippines in terms of engaging the landless in the process of policy making and distribution of large private landholdings to the landless. The various modalities that give peasants a stake in society such as decisive role in agrarian legislations, engaging them in dialogue to resolve agrarian cases, presenting manifesto pinpointing their criticisms and recommendations on implementing rules and guidelines, identification of farmer beneficiaries and lands to be covered, negotiation on the mode of land acquisition and distribution and computation of land values, have significantly influence the process of democratization and establishment of participatory institutions at the local and national levels. 1 CESO III and Director IV, Bureau of Agrarian Reform Beneficiaries Development (BARD), Department of Agrarian Reform (DAR), Diliman, Quezon City, Philippines. She finished her Master of Science in Community Development (MSCD) from the University of the Philippines in 1986 and Master of Development Management (MDM) from the Asian Institute of Management (AIM) in 1996. She is currently taking up Doctor of Public Administration (DPA) at the National College of Public Administration and Governance, University of the Philippines, Diliman, Quezon City. 2 Research and Development Consultant, International Technology Management Corporation (INTEM) and Professor, Western Mindanao State University, Zamboanga City, Philippines. He finished his Doctorate in Public Administration (DPA) at the National College of Public Administration and Governance, University of the Philippines (UP-NCPAG), Diliman, Quezon City in 2004.

  • Agrarian Reform and Philippine Political Development
    SSRN Electronic Journal, 2011
    Co-Authors: Frede Moreno, Susana Evangelista Leones
    Abstract:

    For about sixty-five years, the problem of landownership and control of resources continue to be a Political Development issue in the Philippines - between the wealthy landlords and the poor and landless farmworkers. Agrarian reform is viewed as a necessary condition for agricultural modernization and rural industrialization and the fundamental mooring for global competition. After 12 years of implementing the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program (CARP) in the Philippines, the Department of Agrarian Reform and the Department of Environment and Natural Resources have redistributed 5.33 million hectares of land that account for 53.4 percent of the total farmland. This accomplishment represents 66 percent of the total CARP scope. About 3.1 million rural poor households, who constitute about forty-two percent of the total agricultural population, have directly benefited from the land redistribution. Agrarian Reform has contributed to improvement of the socio-economic conditions of landless farmers and Political Development of the Philippines in terms of engaging the landless in the process of policy making and distribution of large private landholdings to the landless. The various modalities that give peasants a stake in society such as decisive role in agrarian legislations, engaging them in dialogue to resolve agrarian cases, presenting manifesto pinpointing their criticisms and recommendations on implementing rules and guidelines, identification of farmer beneficiaries and lands to be covered, negotiation on the mode of land acquisition and distribution and computation of land values, have significantly influence the process of democratization and establishment of participatory institutions at the local and national levels.

Qiu Zhi - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • The Dynamic Mechanism of Russian Political Development
    Academic Exploration, 2010
    Co-Authors: Qiu Zhi
    Abstract:

    Authority politics is a Political structure model of Russia based on the special domestic and international environment.At present,authority politics,despite an effective role in its transitional society,has many drawbacks and limitations.In the long run,it is inevitable for Russia to develop democratic politics.This article,considering Russian Political reality,analyses the dynamic mechanism promoting Russian Political Development in depth and explores positive factors influencing Russian Political Development.It tries to clarify the internal logic and future trends of Russian Political Development.

Sarjit Singh Darshan Singh - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Influencing Factors of Political Development of Iran, 1953-1979
    Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 2015
    Co-Authors: Maryam Karimi, Sarjit Singh Darshan Singh
    Abstract:

    This article is going to review the major factors of Political Development in Iran. Political Development process had been a new concept usable in twentieth century. So, Iran is one of those societies which were going to change in Political thoughts. In this article, researcher reviews the capabilities of Political system in Iran. In the next part, the factors of Political Development have been realized response of Political elites who do reaction to Developments and make changes in context of the society upon Iran. In the third part, analyzing of Iran’s Political Development illustrates the barriers of Political Development in Iran since 1953 to 1979. In the last part the article concludes that the process of Political Development was affected by the common sense rose up from society context of Iran by these important factors.

  • Political Development Concept by Looking Briefly at the Iran’s Mohammad Reza Pahlavi Rule
    Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 2014
    Co-Authors: Maryam Karimi, Sarjit Singh Darshan Singh
    Abstract:

    Concept of Political Development such as other concepts of Political science has a lack of consensus among researchers and scholars. This article is going to review the concept of Political Development. It begins with an overview on definitions of Political Development. Presumably, it presents different aspects and characteristics of Political Development. This article establishes Iran’s efforts towards Political Development during Mohammad Reza Pahlavi Rule. Moreover, this article concludes that process of Political Development in Iran was affected by two main theories of Political Development by some western and Iranian Political thinker’s definition on this concept.