The Experts below are selected from a list of 88245 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Patrick M. Sexton - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
structure function analysis of amino acid 74 of human ramp1 and RAMP3 and its role in peptide interactions with adrenomedullin and calcitonin gene related peptide receptors
Peptides, 2011Co-Authors: David R Poyner, Patrick M. Sexton, George Christopoulos, Debbie L. HayAbstract:The receptors for calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and adrenomedullin (AM) are complexes of the calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CLR) and receptor activity-modifying proteins (RAMP). The CGRP receptor is a CLR/RAMP1 pairing whereas CLR/RAMP2 and CLR/RAMP3 constitute two subtypes of AM receptor: AM(1) and AM(2), respectively. Previous studies identified Glu74 in RAMP3 to be important for AM binding and potency. To further understand the importance of this residue and its equivalent in RAMP1 (Trp74) we substituted the native amino acids with several others. In RAMP3, these were Trp, Phe, Tyr, Ala, Ser, Thr, Arg and Asn; in RAMP1, Glu, Phe, Tyr, Ala and Asn substitutions were made. The mutant RAMPs were co-expressed with CLR in Cos7 cells; receptor function in response to AM, AM(2)/intermedin and CGRP was measured in a cAMP assay and cell surface expression was determined by ELISA. Phe reduced AM potency in RAMP3 but had no effect in RAMP1. In contrast, Tyr had no effect in RAMP3 but enhanced AM potency in RAMP1. Most other substitutions had a small effect on AM potency in both receptors whereas there was little impact on CGRP or AM(2) potency. Overall, these data suggest that the geometry and charge of the residue at position 74 contribute to how AM interacts with the AM(2) and CGRP receptors and confirms the role of this position in dictating differential AM pharmacology at the AM(2) and CGRP receptors.
-
Molecular basis of association of receptor activity-modifying protein 3 with the family B G protein-coupled secretin receptor.
Biochemistry, 2009Co-Authors: Kaleeckal G. Harikumar, George Christopoulos, Patrick M. Sexton, John Simms, Laurence J MillerAbstract:The three receptor activity-modifying proteins (RAMPs) have been recognized as being important for the trafficking and function of a subset of family B G protein-coupled receptors, although the structural basis for this has not been well established. In the current work, we use morphological fluorescence techniques, bioluminescence resonance energy transfer, and bimolecular fluorescence complementation to demonstrate that the secretin receptor associates specifically with RAMP3, but not with RAMP1 or RAMP2. We use truncation constructs, peptide competition experiments, and chimeric secretin−GLP1 receptor constructs to establish that this association is structurally specific, dependent on the intramembranous region of the RAMP and TM6 and TM7 of this receptor. There were no observed changes in secretin-stimulated cAMP, intracellular calcium, ERK1/2 phosphorylation, or receptor internalization in receptor-bearing COS or CHO-K1 cells in the presence or absence of exogenous RAMP transfection, although the sec...
-
identification of n terminal receptor activity modifying protein residues important for calcitonin gene related peptide adrenomedullin and amylin receptor function
Molecular Pharmacology, 2008Co-Authors: George Christopoulos, Patrick M. Sexton, Arthur Christopoulos, Richard J. Bailey, Debbie L. HayAbstract:Calcitonin-family receptors comprise calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CL) or calcitonin receptor and receptor activity-modifying protein (RAMP) pairings. Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptors are CL/RAMP1, whereas adrenomedullin (AM) receptors are CL/RAMP2 (AM1 receptor) or CL/RAMP3 (AM2 receptor). Amylin (Amy) receptors are RAMP hetero-oligomers with the calcitonin receptor (AMY1, AMY2, and AMY3, respectively). How RAMPs change G protein-coupled receptor pharmacology is not fully understood. We exploited sequence differences between RAMP1 and RAMP3 to identify individual residues capable of altering receptor pharmacology. Alignment of human RAMPs revealed eight residues that are conserved in RAMP2 and RAMP3 but are different in RAMP1. We hypothesized that residues in RAMP2 and RAMP3, but not RAMP1, are responsible for making CL/RAMP2 and CL/RAMP3 AM receptors. Using site-directed mutagenesis, we introduced individual RAMP3 residues into RAMP1 and vice versa in these eight positions. Mutant or wild-type RAMPs were transfected into Cos7 cells with CL or the insert-negative form of the calcitonin receptor [CT(a)]. Agonist-stimulated cAMP production and cell-surface expression of constructs were measured. Position 74 in RAMP1 and RAMP3 was critical for determining AM potency and affinity, and Phe93 in RAMP1 was an important contributor to αCGRP potency at CGRP receptors. Mutant RAMP/CT(a) receptor complexes displayed different phenotypes. It is noteworthy that RAMP1 S103N and W74E mutations led to enhanced rAmy potency, probably related to increased cell-surface expression of these complexes. This differs from the effect on CL-based receptors where expression was unchanged. Targeted substitution has emphasized the importance of position 74 in RAMP1/RAMP3 as a key determinant of AM pharmacology.
-
Receptor activity-modifying proteins differentially modulate the G protein-coupling efficiency of amylin receptors.
Endocrinology, 2008Co-Authors: Maria Morfis, George Christopoulos, Arthur Christopoulos, Nandasena Tilakaratne, Sebastian G.b. Furness, Timothy David Werry, Patrick M. SextonAbstract:Receptor activity-modifying proteins (RAMPs) 1, 2, and 3 are prototypic G protein-coupled receptor accessory proteins that can alter not only receptor trafficking but also receptor phenotype. Specific RAMP interaction with the calcitonin receptor (CTR) generates novel and distinct receptors for the peptide amylin; however, the role of RAMPs in receptor signaling is not understood. The current study demonstrates that RAMP interaction with the CTRa in COS-7 or HEK-293 cells leads to selective modulation of signaling pathways activated by the receptor complex. There was a 20- to 30-fold induction in amylin potency at CTR/RAMP1 (AMY1) and CTR/RAMP3 (AMY3) receptors, compared with CTR alone, for formation of the second-messenger cAMP that parallels an increase in amylin binding affinity. In contrast, only 2- to 5-fold induction of amylin potency was seen for mobilization of intracellular Ca++ or activation of ERK1/2. In addition, in COS-7 cells, the increase in amylin potency for Ca++ mobilization was 2-fold g...
-
The effects of C-terminal truncation of receptor activity modifying proteins on the induction of amylin receptor phenotype from human CTb receptors.
Regulatory peptides, 2007Co-Authors: Madhara Udawela, George Christopoulos, Arthur Christopoulos, Maria Morfis, Nandasena Tilakaratne, Patrick M. SextonAbstract:Receptor activity modifying proteins (RAMPs) interact with calcitonin receptors to produce novel amylin receptor phenotypes. We have recently demonstrated that the short intracellular C-terminus of RAMPs plays a key role in the function of amylin receptors derived from the CTa calcitonin receptor through the use of chimeric RAMPs and RAMPs that are truncated at the C-terminus [15, Udawela M, Christopoulos G, Morfis M, Christopoulos A, Ye S, Tilakaratne N, Sexton PM. A critical role for the short intracellular C terminus in receptor activity modifying protein function. Mol Pharmacol 2006;70:1750-60., 18, Udawela M, Christopoulos G, Tilakaratne N, Christopoulos A, Albiston A, Sexton PM. Distinct receptor activity-modifying protein domains differentially modulate interaction with calcitonin receptors. Mol Pharmacol 2006;69:1984-89.]. The calcitonin receptor in humans is expressed as two major alternatively spliced isoforms termed CTa and CTb. Relatively little is known about how alternate splicing of the receptor affects the interaction between calcitonin receptors and RAMPs. We have examined the effect of RAMP truncation, through use of mutant constructs that delete the last 8 amino acids of each of the 3 known human RAMPs, and characterised these for interaction with CTb receptors through co-expression in COS-7 cells. As seen with the CTa receptor isoform, RAMP truncation caused a marked loss in induction of AMYb receptor phenotypes as characterised by (125)I-rat amylin radioligand binding assays and cAMP accumulation assays; the latter as a marker of receptor signalling. The effect was most pronounced for RAMP1 and RAMP2 deletion mutants, but attenuated responses were also observed with co-expressed RAMP3 deletion mutants. These data support a direct role for the RAMP C-terminus in the interaction of RAMP/calcitonin receptor complexes with intracellular accessory proteins involved in signalling and/or receptor trafficking.
Debbie L. Hay - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
probing the mechanism of receptor activity modifying protein modulation of gpcr ligand selectivity through rational design of potent adrenomedullin and calcitonin gene related peptide antagonists
Molecular Pharmacology, 2018Co-Authors: Jason M. Booe, Debbie L. Hay, Margaret L. Warner, Amanda M Roehrkasse, Augen A PioszakAbstract:Binding of the vasodilator peptides adrenomedullin (AM) and calcitonin gene–related peptide (CGRP) to the class B G protein–coupled receptor calcitonin receptor–like receptor (CLR) is modulated by receptor activity–modifying proteins (RAMPs). RAMP1 favors CGRP, whereas RAMP2 and RAMP3 favor AM. Crystal structures of peptide-bound RAMP1/2-CLR extracellular domain (ECD) heterodimers suggested RAMPs alter ligand preference through direct peptide contacts and allosteric modulation of CLR. Here, we probed this dual mechanism through rational structure-guided design of AM and CGRP antagonist variants. Variants were characterized for binding to purified RAMP1/2-CLR ECD and for antagonism of the full-length CGRP (RAMP1:CLR), AM1 (RAMP2:CLR), and AM2 (RAMP3:CLR) receptors. Short nanomolar affinity AM(37–52) and CGRP(27–37) variants were obtained through substitutions including AM S45W/Q50W and CGRP K35W/A36S designed to stabilize their β-turn. K46L and Y52F substitutions designed to exploit RAMP allosteric effects and direct peptide contacts, respectively, yielded AM variants with selectivity for the CGRP receptor over the AM1 receptor. AM(37–52) S45W/K46L/Q50W/Y52F exhibited nanomolar potency at the CGRP receptor and micromolar potency at AM1. A 2.8-A resolution crystal structure of this variant bound to the RAMP1-CLR ECD confirmed that it bound as designed. CGRP(27–37) N31D/S34P/K35W/A36S exhibited potency and selectivity comparable to the traditional antagonist CGRP(8–37). Giving this variant the ability to contact RAMP2 through the F37Y substitution increased affinity for AM1, but it still preferred the CGRP receptor. These potent peptide antagonists with altered selectivity inform the development of AM/CGRP-based pharmacological tools and support the hypothesis that RAMPs alter CLR ligand selectivity through allosteric effects and direct peptide contacts.
-
update on the pharmacology of calcitonin cgrp family of peptides iuphar review 25
British Journal of Pharmacology, 2018Co-Authors: Debbie L. Hay, David R Poyner, Michael L Garelja, Christopher S. WalkerAbstract:The calcitonin/calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) family of peptides includes calcitonin, α and β CGRP, amylin, adrenomedullin (AM) and adrenomedullin 2/intermedin (AM2/IMD). Their receptors consist of one of two G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), the calcitonin receptor (CTR) or the calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CLR). Further diversity arises from heterodimerisation of these GPCRs with one of three receptor activity-modifying proteins (RAMPs). This gives the CGRP receptor (CLR/RAMP1), the AM1 and AM2 receptors (CLR/RAMP2 or RAMP3) and the AMY1, AMY2 and AMY3 receptors (CTR/RAMPs1-3 complexes, respectively). Apart from the CGRP receptor, there are only peptide antagonists widely available for these receptors and these have limited selectivity, thus defining the function of each receptor in vivo remains challenging. Further challenges arise from the probable co-expression of CTR with the CTR/RAMP complexes and species-dependent splice variants of the CTR (CT(a) and CT(b)). Furthermore, the AMY1(a) receptor is activated equally well by both amylin and CGRP and the preferred receptor for AM2/IMD has been unclear. However, there are clear therapeutic rationales for developing agents against the various receptors for these peptides. For example many agents targeting the CGRP system are in clinical trials and pramlintide, an amylin analogue, is an approved therapy for insulin-requiring diabetes. This review provides an update on the pharmacology of the calcitonin family of peptides by members of the corresponding subcommittee of the International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology and colleagues.
-
calcitonin and amylin receptor peptide interaction mechanisms insights into peptide binding modes and allosteric modulation of the calcitonin receptor by receptor activity modifying proteins
Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2016Co-Authors: Sangmin Lee, Debbie L. Hay, Augen A PioszakAbstract:Receptor activity-modifying proteins (RAMP1-3) determine the selectivity of the class B G protein-coupled calcitonin receptor (CTR) and the CTR-like receptor (CLR) for calcitonin (CT), amylin (Amy), calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), and adrenomedullin (AM) peptides. RAMP1/2 alter CLR selectivity for CGRP/AM in part by RAMP1 Trp-84 or RAMP2 Glu-101 contacting the distinct CGRP/AM C-terminal residues. It is unclear whether RAMPs use a similar mechanism to modulate CTR affinity for CT and Amy, analogs of which are therapeutics for bone disorders and diabetes, respectively. Here, we reproduced the peptide selectivity of intact CTR, AMY1 (CTR·RAMP1), and AMY2 (CTR·RAMP2) receptors using purified CTR extracellular domain (ECD) and tethered RAMP1- and RAMP2-CTR ECD fusion proteins and antagonist peptides. All three proteins bound salmon calcitonin (sCT). Tethering RAMPs to CTR enhanced binding of rAmy, CGRP, and the AMY antagonist AC413. Peptide alanine-scanning mutagenesis and modeling of receptor-bound sCT and AC413 supported a shared non-helical CGRP-like conformation for their TN(T/V)G motif prior to the C terminus. After this motif, the peptides diverged; the sCT C-terminal Pro was crucial for receptor binding, whereas the AC413/rAmy C-terminal Tyr had little or no influence on binding. Accordingly, mutant RAMP1 W84A- and RAMP2 E101A-CTR ECD retained AC413/rAmy binding. ECD binding and cell-based signaling assays with antagonist sCT/AC413/rAmy variants with C-terminal residue swaps indicated that the C-terminal sCT/rAmy residue identity affects affinity more than selectivity. rAmy(8-37) Y37P exhibited enhanced antagonism of AMY1 while retaining selectivity. These results reveal unexpected differences in how RAMPs determine CTR and CLR peptide selectivity and support the hypothesis that RAMPs allosterically modulate CTR peptide affinity.
-
receptor activity modifying protein dependent effects of mutations in the calcitonin receptor like receptor implications for adrenomedullin and calcitonin gene related peptide pharmacology
British Journal of Pharmacology, 2014Co-Authors: Harriet A Watkins, David R Poyner, Richard J. Bailey, Christopher S. Walker, James Barwell, Debbie L. HayAbstract:Background and Purpose Receptor activity-modifying proteins (RAMPs) define the pharmacology of the calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CLR). The interactions of the different RAMPs with this class B GPCR yield high-affinity calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) or adrenomedullin (AM) receptors. However, the mechanism for this is unclear. Experimental Approach Guided by receptor models, we mutated residues in the N-terminal helix of CLR, RAMP2 and RAMP3 hypothesized to be involved in peptide interactions. These were assayed for cAMP production with AM, AM2 and CGRP together with their cell surface expression. Binding studies were also conducted for selected mutants. Key Results An important domain for peptide interactions on CLR from I32 to I52 was defined. Although I41 was universally important for binding and receptor function, the role of other residues depended on both ligand and RAMP. Peptide binding to CLR/RAMP3 involved a more restricted range of residues than that to CLR/RAMP1 or CLR/RAMP2. E101 of RAMP2 had a major role in AM interactions, and F111/W84 of RAMP2/3 was important with each peptide. Conclusions and Implications RAMP-dependent effects of CLR mutations suggest that the different RAMPs control accessibility of peptides to binding residues situated on the CLR N-terminus. RAMP3 appears to alter the role of specific residues at the CLR-RAMP interface compared with RAMP1 and RAMP2.
-
the third extracellular loop of the human calcitonin receptor like receptor is crucial for the activation of adrenomedullin signalling
British Journal of Pharmacology, 2012Co-Authors: Kenji Kuwasako, Sayaka Nagata, Kazuo Kitamura, Debbie L. Hay, Tomomi Hikosaka, Johji KatoAbstract:BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The extracellular loops (ECLs) in Family A GPCRs are important for ligand binding and receptor activation, but little is known about the function of Family B GPCR ECLs, especially ECL3. Calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CLR), a Family B GPCR, functions as a calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and an adrenomedullin (AM) receptor in association with three receptor activity-modifying proteins (RAMPs). Here, we examined the function of the ECL3 of human CLR within the CGRP and AM receptors. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH A CLR ECL3 chimera, in which the ECL3 of CLR was substituted with that of VPAC2 (a Family B GPCR that is unable to interact with RAMPs), and CLR ECL3 point mutants were constructed and transiently transfected into HEK-293 cells along with each RAMP. Cell-surface expression of each receptor complex was then measured by flow cytometry; [125I]-CGRP and [125I]-AM binding and intracellular cAMP accumulation were also measured. KEY RESULTS Co-expression of the CLR ECL3 chimera with RAMP2 or RAMP3 led to significant reductions in the induction of cAMP signalling by AM, but CGRP signalling was barely affected, despite normal cell-surface expression of the receptors and normal [125I]-AM binding. The chimera had significantly decreased AM, but not CGRP, responses in the presence of RAMP1. Not all CLR ECL3 mutants supported these findings. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS The human CLR ECL3 is crucial for AM-induced cAMP responses via three CLR/RAMP heterodimers, and activation of these heterodimers probably relies on AM-induced conformational changes. This study provides a clue to the molecular basis of the activation of RAMP-based Family B GPCRs. LINKED ARTICLES This article is part of a themed section on Secretin Family (Class B) G Protein-Coupled Receptors. To view the other articles in this section visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bph.2012.166.issue-1
George Christopoulos - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
structure function analysis of amino acid 74 of human ramp1 and RAMP3 and its role in peptide interactions with adrenomedullin and calcitonin gene related peptide receptors
Peptides, 2011Co-Authors: David R Poyner, Patrick M. Sexton, George Christopoulos, Debbie L. HayAbstract:The receptors for calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and adrenomedullin (AM) are complexes of the calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CLR) and receptor activity-modifying proteins (RAMP). The CGRP receptor is a CLR/RAMP1 pairing whereas CLR/RAMP2 and CLR/RAMP3 constitute two subtypes of AM receptor: AM(1) and AM(2), respectively. Previous studies identified Glu74 in RAMP3 to be important for AM binding and potency. To further understand the importance of this residue and its equivalent in RAMP1 (Trp74) we substituted the native amino acids with several others. In RAMP3, these were Trp, Phe, Tyr, Ala, Ser, Thr, Arg and Asn; in RAMP1, Glu, Phe, Tyr, Ala and Asn substitutions were made. The mutant RAMPs were co-expressed with CLR in Cos7 cells; receptor function in response to AM, AM(2)/intermedin and CGRP was measured in a cAMP assay and cell surface expression was determined by ELISA. Phe reduced AM potency in RAMP3 but had no effect in RAMP1. In contrast, Tyr had no effect in RAMP3 but enhanced AM potency in RAMP1. Most other substitutions had a small effect on AM potency in both receptors whereas there was little impact on CGRP or AM(2) potency. Overall, these data suggest that the geometry and charge of the residue at position 74 contribute to how AM interacts with the AM(2) and CGRP receptors and confirms the role of this position in dictating differential AM pharmacology at the AM(2) and CGRP receptors.
-
Molecular basis of association of receptor activity-modifying protein 3 with the family B G protein-coupled secretin receptor.
Biochemistry, 2009Co-Authors: Kaleeckal G. Harikumar, George Christopoulos, Patrick M. Sexton, John Simms, Laurence J MillerAbstract:The three receptor activity-modifying proteins (RAMPs) have been recognized as being important for the trafficking and function of a subset of family B G protein-coupled receptors, although the structural basis for this has not been well established. In the current work, we use morphological fluorescence techniques, bioluminescence resonance energy transfer, and bimolecular fluorescence complementation to demonstrate that the secretin receptor associates specifically with RAMP3, but not with RAMP1 or RAMP2. We use truncation constructs, peptide competition experiments, and chimeric secretin−GLP1 receptor constructs to establish that this association is structurally specific, dependent on the intramembranous region of the RAMP and TM6 and TM7 of this receptor. There were no observed changes in secretin-stimulated cAMP, intracellular calcium, ERK1/2 phosphorylation, or receptor internalization in receptor-bearing COS or CHO-K1 cells in the presence or absence of exogenous RAMP transfection, although the sec...
-
identification of n terminal receptor activity modifying protein residues important for calcitonin gene related peptide adrenomedullin and amylin receptor function
Molecular Pharmacology, 2008Co-Authors: George Christopoulos, Patrick M. Sexton, Arthur Christopoulos, Richard J. Bailey, Debbie L. HayAbstract:Calcitonin-family receptors comprise calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CL) or calcitonin receptor and receptor activity-modifying protein (RAMP) pairings. Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptors are CL/RAMP1, whereas adrenomedullin (AM) receptors are CL/RAMP2 (AM1 receptor) or CL/RAMP3 (AM2 receptor). Amylin (Amy) receptors are RAMP hetero-oligomers with the calcitonin receptor (AMY1, AMY2, and AMY3, respectively). How RAMPs change G protein-coupled receptor pharmacology is not fully understood. We exploited sequence differences between RAMP1 and RAMP3 to identify individual residues capable of altering receptor pharmacology. Alignment of human RAMPs revealed eight residues that are conserved in RAMP2 and RAMP3 but are different in RAMP1. We hypothesized that residues in RAMP2 and RAMP3, but not RAMP1, are responsible for making CL/RAMP2 and CL/RAMP3 AM receptors. Using site-directed mutagenesis, we introduced individual RAMP3 residues into RAMP1 and vice versa in these eight positions. Mutant or wild-type RAMPs were transfected into Cos7 cells with CL or the insert-negative form of the calcitonin receptor [CT(a)]. Agonist-stimulated cAMP production and cell-surface expression of constructs were measured. Position 74 in RAMP1 and RAMP3 was critical for determining AM potency and affinity, and Phe93 in RAMP1 was an important contributor to αCGRP potency at CGRP receptors. Mutant RAMP/CT(a) receptor complexes displayed different phenotypes. It is noteworthy that RAMP1 S103N and W74E mutations led to enhanced rAmy potency, probably related to increased cell-surface expression of these complexes. This differs from the effect on CL-based receptors where expression was unchanged. Targeted substitution has emphasized the importance of position 74 in RAMP1/RAMP3 as a key determinant of AM pharmacology.
-
Receptor activity-modifying proteins differentially modulate the G protein-coupling efficiency of amylin receptors.
Endocrinology, 2008Co-Authors: Maria Morfis, George Christopoulos, Arthur Christopoulos, Nandasena Tilakaratne, Sebastian G.b. Furness, Timothy David Werry, Patrick M. SextonAbstract:Receptor activity-modifying proteins (RAMPs) 1, 2, and 3 are prototypic G protein-coupled receptor accessory proteins that can alter not only receptor trafficking but also receptor phenotype. Specific RAMP interaction with the calcitonin receptor (CTR) generates novel and distinct receptors for the peptide amylin; however, the role of RAMPs in receptor signaling is not understood. The current study demonstrates that RAMP interaction with the CTRa in COS-7 or HEK-293 cells leads to selective modulation of signaling pathways activated by the receptor complex. There was a 20- to 30-fold induction in amylin potency at CTR/RAMP1 (AMY1) and CTR/RAMP3 (AMY3) receptors, compared with CTR alone, for formation of the second-messenger cAMP that parallels an increase in amylin binding affinity. In contrast, only 2- to 5-fold induction of amylin potency was seen for mobilization of intracellular Ca++ or activation of ERK1/2. In addition, in COS-7 cells, the increase in amylin potency for Ca++ mobilization was 2-fold g...
-
The effects of C-terminal truncation of receptor activity modifying proteins on the induction of amylin receptor phenotype from human CTb receptors.
Regulatory peptides, 2007Co-Authors: Madhara Udawela, George Christopoulos, Arthur Christopoulos, Maria Morfis, Nandasena Tilakaratne, Patrick M. SextonAbstract:Receptor activity modifying proteins (RAMPs) interact with calcitonin receptors to produce novel amylin receptor phenotypes. We have recently demonstrated that the short intracellular C-terminus of RAMPs plays a key role in the function of amylin receptors derived from the CTa calcitonin receptor through the use of chimeric RAMPs and RAMPs that are truncated at the C-terminus [15, Udawela M, Christopoulos G, Morfis M, Christopoulos A, Ye S, Tilakaratne N, Sexton PM. A critical role for the short intracellular C terminus in receptor activity modifying protein function. Mol Pharmacol 2006;70:1750-60., 18, Udawela M, Christopoulos G, Tilakaratne N, Christopoulos A, Albiston A, Sexton PM. Distinct receptor activity-modifying protein domains differentially modulate interaction with calcitonin receptors. Mol Pharmacol 2006;69:1984-89.]. The calcitonin receptor in humans is expressed as two major alternatively spliced isoforms termed CTa and CTb. Relatively little is known about how alternate splicing of the receptor affects the interaction between calcitonin receptors and RAMPs. We have examined the effect of RAMP truncation, through use of mutant constructs that delete the last 8 amino acids of each of the 3 known human RAMPs, and characterised these for interaction with CTb receptors through co-expression in COS-7 cells. As seen with the CTa receptor isoform, RAMP truncation caused a marked loss in induction of AMYb receptor phenotypes as characterised by (125)I-rat amylin radioligand binding assays and cAMP accumulation assays; the latter as a marker of receptor signalling. The effect was most pronounced for RAMP1 and RAMP2 deletion mutants, but attenuated responses were also observed with co-expressed RAMP3 deletion mutants. These data support a direct role for the RAMP C-terminus in the interaction of RAMP/calcitonin receptor complexes with intracellular accessory proteins involved in signalling and/or receptor trafficking.
David R Poyner - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
interactions between ramp2 and crf receptors the effect of receptor subtypes splice variants and cell context
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 2019Co-Authors: Sian Bailey, John Simms, Mark Wheatley, Matthew Harris, Graham Ladds, Kerry Barkan, Ian Winfield, Matthew T Harper, David R PoynerAbstract:Abstract Corticotrophin releasing factor (CRF) acts via two family B G-protein-coupled receptors, CRFR1 and CRFR2. Additional subtypes exist due to alternative splicing. CRFR1α is the most widely expressed subtype and lacks a 29-residue insert in the first intracellular loop that is present in CRFR1β. It has been shown previously that co-expression of CRFR1β with receptor activity modifying protein 2 (RAMP2) in HEK 293S cells increased the cell-surface expression of both proteins suggesting a physical interaction as seen with RAMPs and calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CLR). This study investigated the ability of CRFR1α, CRFR1β and CRFR2β to promote cell-surface expression of FLAG-tagged RAMP2. Four different cell-lines were utilised to investigate the effect of varying cellular context; COS-7, HEK 293T, HEK 293S and [ΔCTR]HEK 293 (which lacks endogenous calcitonin receptor). In all cell-lines, CRFR1α and CRFR1β enhanced RAMP2 cell-surface expression. The magnitude of the effect on RAMP2 was dependent on the cell-line ([ΔCTR]HEK 293 > COS-7 > HEK 293T > HEK 293S). RT-PCR indicated this variation may relate to differences in endogenous RAMP expression between cell types. Furthermore, pre-treatment with CRF resulted in a loss of cell-surface FLAG-RAMP2 when it was co-expressed with CRFR1 subtypes. CRFR2β co-expression had no effect on RAMP2 in any cell-line. Molecular modelling suggests that the potential contact interface between the extracellular domains of RAMP2 and CRF receptor subtypes is smaller than that of RAMP2 and CRL, the canonical receptor:RAMP pairing, assuming a physical interaction. Furthermore, a specific residue difference between CRFR1 subtypes (glutamate) and CRFR2β (histidine) in this interface region may impair CRFR2β:RAMP2 interaction by electrostatic repulsion.
-
update on the pharmacology of calcitonin cgrp family of peptides iuphar review 25
British Journal of Pharmacology, 2018Co-Authors: Debbie L. Hay, David R Poyner, Michael L Garelja, Christopher S. WalkerAbstract:The calcitonin/calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) family of peptides includes calcitonin, α and β CGRP, amylin, adrenomedullin (AM) and adrenomedullin 2/intermedin (AM2/IMD). Their receptors consist of one of two G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), the calcitonin receptor (CTR) or the calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CLR). Further diversity arises from heterodimerisation of these GPCRs with one of three receptor activity-modifying proteins (RAMPs). This gives the CGRP receptor (CLR/RAMP1), the AM1 and AM2 receptors (CLR/RAMP2 or RAMP3) and the AMY1, AMY2 and AMY3 receptors (CTR/RAMPs1-3 complexes, respectively). Apart from the CGRP receptor, there are only peptide antagonists widely available for these receptors and these have limited selectivity, thus defining the function of each receptor in vivo remains challenging. Further challenges arise from the probable co-expression of CTR with the CTR/RAMP complexes and species-dependent splice variants of the CTR (CT(a) and CT(b)). Furthermore, the AMY1(a) receptor is activated equally well by both amylin and CGRP and the preferred receptor for AM2/IMD has been unclear. However, there are clear therapeutic rationales for developing agents against the various receptors for these peptides. For example many agents targeting the CGRP system are in clinical trials and pramlintide, an amylin analogue, is an approved therapy for insulin-requiring diabetes. This review provides an update on the pharmacology of the calcitonin family of peptides by members of the corresponding subcommittee of the International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology and colleagues.
-
receptor activity modifying protein dependent effects of mutations in the calcitonin receptor like receptor implications for adrenomedullin and calcitonin gene related peptide pharmacology
British Journal of Pharmacology, 2014Co-Authors: Harriet A Watkins, David R Poyner, Richard J. Bailey, Christopher S. Walker, James Barwell, Debbie L. HayAbstract:Background and Purpose Receptor activity-modifying proteins (RAMPs) define the pharmacology of the calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CLR). The interactions of the different RAMPs with this class B GPCR yield high-affinity calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) or adrenomedullin (AM) receptors. However, the mechanism for this is unclear. Experimental Approach Guided by receptor models, we mutated residues in the N-terminal helix of CLR, RAMP2 and RAMP3 hypothesized to be involved in peptide interactions. These were assayed for cAMP production with AM, AM2 and CGRP together with their cell surface expression. Binding studies were also conducted for selected mutants. Key Results An important domain for peptide interactions on CLR from I32 to I52 was defined. Although I41 was universally important for binding and receptor function, the role of other residues depended on both ligand and RAMP. Peptide binding to CLR/RAMP3 involved a more restricted range of residues than that to CLR/RAMP1 or CLR/RAMP2. E101 of RAMP2 had a major role in AM interactions, and F111/W84 of RAMP2/3 was important with each peptide. Conclusions and Implications RAMP-dependent effects of CLR mutations suggest that the different RAMPs control accessibility of peptides to binding residues situated on the CLR N-terminus. RAMP3 appears to alter the role of specific residues at the CLR-RAMP interface compared with RAMP1 and RAMP2.
-
structure function analysis of amino acid 74 of human ramp1 and RAMP3 and its role in peptide interactions with adrenomedullin and calcitonin gene related peptide receptors
Peptides, 2011Co-Authors: David R Poyner, Patrick M. Sexton, George Christopoulos, Debbie L. HayAbstract:The receptors for calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and adrenomedullin (AM) are complexes of the calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CLR) and receptor activity-modifying proteins (RAMP). The CGRP receptor is a CLR/RAMP1 pairing whereas CLR/RAMP2 and CLR/RAMP3 constitute two subtypes of AM receptor: AM(1) and AM(2), respectively. Previous studies identified Glu74 in RAMP3 to be important for AM binding and potency. To further understand the importance of this residue and its equivalent in RAMP1 (Trp74) we substituted the native amino acids with several others. In RAMP3, these were Trp, Phe, Tyr, Ala, Ser, Thr, Arg and Asn; in RAMP1, Glu, Phe, Tyr, Ala and Asn substitutions were made. The mutant RAMPs were co-expressed with CLR in Cos7 cells; receptor function in response to AM, AM(2)/intermedin and CGRP was measured in a cAMP assay and cell surface expression was determined by ELISA. Phe reduced AM potency in RAMP3 but had no effect in RAMP1. In contrast, Tyr had no effect in RAMP3 but enhanced AM potency in RAMP1. Most other substitutions had a small effect on AM potency in both receptors whereas there was little impact on CGRP or AM(2) potency. Overall, these data suggest that the geometry and charge of the residue at position 74 contribute to how AM interacts with the AM(2) and CGRP receptors and confirms the role of this position in dictating differential AM pharmacology at the AM(2) and CGRP receptors.
-
Structure-function analysis of RAMP1-RAMP3 chimeras.
Biochemistry, 2010Co-Authors: John Simms, Debbie L. Hay, Richard J. Bailey, Mark Wheatley, Daniel L. Rathbone, David R PoynerAbstract:The role of receptor activity modifying protein 1 (RAMP1) in forming receptors with the calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CLR) and the calcitonin receptor (CTR) was examined by producing chimeras between RAMP1 and RAMP3. RAMPs have three extracellular helices. Exchange of helix 1 of the RAMPs or residues 62-69 in helix 2 greatly reduced CLR trafficking (a marker for CLR association). Modeling suggests that these exchanges alter the CLR recognition site on RAMP1, which is more exposed than on RAMP3. Exchange of residues 86-89 of RAMP1 had no effect on the trafficking of CLR but reduced the potency of human (h) alphaCGRP and adrenomedullin. However, these alterations to RAMP1 had no effect on the potency of hbetaCGRP. These residues of RAMP1 lie at the junction of helix 3 and its connecting loop with helix 2. Modeling suggests that the loop is more exposed in RAMP1 than RAMP3; it may play an important role in peptide binding, either directly or indirectly. Exchange of residues 90-94 of RAMP1 caused a modest reduction in CLR expression and a 15-fold decrease in CGRP potency. It is unlikely that the decrease in expression is enough to explain the reduction in potency, and so these may have dual roles in recognizing CLR and CGRP. For CTR, only 6 out of 26 chimeras covering the extracellular part of RAMP1 did not reduce agonist potency. Thus the association of CTR with RAMP1 seems more sensitive to changes in RAMP1 structure induced by the chimeras than is CLR.
Kazuo Kitamura - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
the third extracellular loop of the human calcitonin receptor like receptor is crucial for the activation of adrenomedullin signalling
British Journal of Pharmacology, 2012Co-Authors: Kenji Kuwasako, Sayaka Nagata, Kazuo Kitamura, Debbie L. Hay, Tomomi Hikosaka, Johji KatoAbstract:BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The extracellular loops (ECLs) in Family A GPCRs are important for ligand binding and receptor activation, but little is known about the function of Family B GPCR ECLs, especially ECL3. Calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CLR), a Family B GPCR, functions as a calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and an adrenomedullin (AM) receptor in association with three receptor activity-modifying proteins (RAMPs). Here, we examined the function of the ECL3 of human CLR within the CGRP and AM receptors. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH A CLR ECL3 chimera, in which the ECL3 of CLR was substituted with that of VPAC2 (a Family B GPCR that is unable to interact with RAMPs), and CLR ECL3 point mutants were constructed and transiently transfected into HEK-293 cells along with each RAMP. Cell-surface expression of each receptor complex was then measured by flow cytometry; [125I]-CGRP and [125I]-AM binding and intracellular cAMP accumulation were also measured. KEY RESULTS Co-expression of the CLR ECL3 chimera with RAMP2 or RAMP3 led to significant reductions in the induction of cAMP signalling by AM, but CGRP signalling was barely affected, despite normal cell-surface expression of the receptors and normal [125I]-AM binding. The chimera had significantly decreased AM, but not CGRP, responses in the presence of RAMP1. Not all CLR ECL3 mutants supported these findings. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS The human CLR ECL3 is crucial for AM-induced cAMP responses via three CLR/RAMP heterodimers, and activation of these heterodimers probably relies on AM-induced conformational changes. This study provides a clue to the molecular basis of the activation of RAMP-based Family B GPCRs. LINKED ARTICLES This article is part of a themed section on Secretin Family (Class B) G Protein-Coupled Receptors. To view the other articles in this section visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bph.2012.166.issue-1
-
characterization of the single transmembrane domain of human receptor activity modifying protein 3 in adrenomedullin receptor internalization
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 2012Co-Authors: Kazuo Kitamura, Sayaka Nagata, Naomi Nozaki, Johji KatoAbstract:Abstract Two receptor activity-modifying proteins (RAMP2 and RAMP3) enable calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CLR) to function as two heterodimeric receptors (CLR/RAMP2 and CLR/RAMP3) for adrenomedullin (AM), a potent cardiovascular protective peptide. Following AM stimulation, both receptors undergo rapid internalization through a clathrin-dependent pathway, after which CLR/RAMP3, but not CLR/RAMP2, can be recycled to the cell surface for resensitization. However, human (h)RAMP3 mediates CLR internalization much less efficiently than does hRAMP2. Therefore, the molecular basis of the single transmembrane domain (TMD) and the intracellular domain of hRAMP3 during AM receptor internalization was investigated by transiently transfecting various RAMP chimeras and mutants into HEK-293 cells stably expressing hCLR. Flow cytometric analysis revealed that substituting the RAMP3 TMD with that of RAMP2 markedly enhanced AM-induced internalization of CLR. However, this replacement did not enhance the cell surface expression of CLR, [125I]AM binding affinity or AM-induced cAMP response. More detailed analyses showed that substituting the Thr130–Val131 sequence in the RAMP3 TMD with the corresponding sequence (Ile157–Pro158) from RAMP2 significantly enhanced AM-mediated CLR internalization. In contrast, substituting the RAMP3 target sequence with Ala130–Ala131 did not significantly affect CLR internalization. Thus, the RAMP3 TMD participates in the negative regulation of CLR/RAMP3 internalization, and the aforementioned introduction of the Ile–Pro sequence into the RAMP3 TMD may be a strategy for promoting receptor internalization/resensitization.
-
functions of the cytoplasmic tails of the human receptor activity modifying protein components of calcitonin gene related peptide and adrenomedullin receptors
Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2006Co-Authors: Yuan-ning Cao, Tanenao Eto, Chunping Chu, Shuji Iwatsubo, Kazuo KitamuraAbstract:Next Section Abstract Receptor activity-modifying proteins (RAMPs) enable calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CRLR) to function as a calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor (CRLR/RAMP1) or an adrenomedullin (AM) receptor (CRLR/RAMP2 or -3). Here we investigated the functions of the cytoplasmic C-terminal tails (C-tails) of human RAMP1, -2, and -3 (hRAMP1, -2, and -3) by cotransfecting their C-terminal deletion or progressive truncation mutants into HEK-293 cells stably expressing hCRLR. Deletion of the C-tail from hRAMP1 had little effect on the surface expression, function, or intracellular trafficking of the mutant heterodimers. By contrast, deletion of the C-tail from hRAMP2 disrupted transport of hCRLR to the cell surface, resulting in significant reductions in 125I-hAM binding and evoked cAMP accumulation. The transfection efficiency for the hRAMP2 mutant was comparable with that for wild-type hRAMP2; moreover, immunocytochemical analysis showed that the mutant hRAMP2 remained within the endoplasmic reticulum. FACS analysis revealed that deleting the C-tail from hRAMP3 markedly enhances AM-evoked internalization of the mutant heterodimers, although there was no change in agonist affinity. Truncating the C-tails by removing the six C-terminal amino acids of hRAMP2 and -3 or exchanging their C-tails with one another had no effect on surface expression, agonist affinity, or internalization of hCRLR, which suggests that the highly conserved Ser-Lys sequence within hRAMP C-tails is involved in cellular trafficking of the two AM receptors. Notably, deleting the respective C-tails from hRAMPs had no effect on lysosomal sorting of hCRLR. Thus, the respective C-tails of hRAMP2 and -3 differentially affect hCRLR surface delivery and internalization.
-
functions of the cytoplasmic tails of the human receptor activity modifying protein components of calcitonin gene related peptide and adrenomedullin receptors
Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2006Co-Authors: Kenji Kuwasako, Tanenao Eto, Yuan-ning Cao, Chunping Chu, Shuji Iwatsubo, Kazuo KitamuraAbstract:Receptor activity-modifying proteins (RAMPs) enable calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CRLR) to function as a calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor (CRLR/RAMP1) or an adrenomedullin (AM) receptor (CRLR/RAMP2 or -3). Here we investigated the functions of the cytoplasmic C-terminal tails (C-tails) of human RAMP1, -2, and -3 (hRAMP1, -2, and -3) by cotransfecting their C-terminal deletion or progressive truncation mutants into HEK-293 cells stably expressing hCRLR. Deletion of the C-tail from hRAMP1 had little effect on the surface expression, function, or intracellular trafficking of the mutant heterodimers. By contrast, deletion of the C-tail from hRAMP2 disrupted transport of hCRLR to the cell surface, resulting in significant reductions in 125I-hAM binding and evoked cAMP accumulation. The transfection efficiency for the hRAMP2 mutant was comparable with that for wild-type hRAMP2; moreover, immunocytochemical analysis showed that the mutant hRAMP2 remained within the endoplasmic reticulum. FACS analysis revealed that deleting the C-tail from hRAMP3 markedly enhances AM-evoked internalization of the mutant heterodimers, although there was no change in agonist affinity. Truncating the C-tails by removing the six C-terminal amino acids of hRAMP2 and -3 or exchanging their C-tails with one another had no effect on surface expression, agonist affinity, or internalization of hCRLR, which suggests that the highly conserved Ser-Lys sequence within hRAMP C-tails is involved in cellular trafficking of the two AM receptors. Notably, deleting the respective C-tails from hRAMPs had no effect on lysosomal sorting of hCRLR. Thus, the respective C-tails of hRAMP2 and -3 differentially affect hCRLR surface delivery and internalization.
-
the calcitonin receptor like receptor receptor activity modifying protein 1 heterodimer can function as a calcitonin gene related peptide 8 37 sensitive adrenomedullin receptor
European Journal of Pharmacology, 2002Co-Authors: Yasuko Nagoshi, Johji Kato, Kazuo Kitamura, Kenji Kuwasako, Kaoru Ito, Tomohiko Uemura, Tanenao EtoAbstract:Abstract The receptor activity-modifying protein (RAMP)/calcitonin receptor-like (CRL) receptor heterodimer is thought to function as a receptor for either a calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) (CRL receptor/RAMP1) or adrenomedullin (CRL receptor/RAMP2 or -3), depending on the RAMP isoform present. We examined the receptor specificity of adrenomedullin-induced increases in cAMP in human embryonic kidney (HEK)293 cells coexpressing human CRL receptor and human RAMP1 or RAMP2. In cells expressing CRL receptor/RAMP1, adrenomedulin-induced increases in cAMP were comparable to those induced by α-CGRP, and the CGRP receptor antagonist α-CGRP-(8–37), but not the adrenomedullin receptor antagonist adrenomedullin-(22–52), blocked the adrenomedullin-evoked responses. Cells expressing CRL receptor/RAMP2 responded more selectively to adrenomedullin; in this case, the effect was blocked by adrenomedullin-(22–52) but not by α-CGRP-(8–37). Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction confirmed that cotransfection of CRL receptor and RAMP1 had no effect on the endogenous expression of RAMP2. Thus, CRL receptor/RAMP1 likely functions as an adrenomedullin receptor as well as a CGRP receptor, which may explain why many of the actions of adrenomedullin are potently antagonized by α-CGRP-(8–37).
