The Experts below are selected from a list of 18051 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Zhan Guo - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Street Standards as Parking Policy Rethinking the Provision of Residential Street Parking in American Suburbs
    Journal of Planning Education and Research, 2013
    Co-Authors: Zhan Guo, Luis Schloeter
    Abstract:

    This paper examines the parking mandate in Residential Street standards in the United States. Based on literature review and a national survey of ninety-seven principal cities in the top fifty-two metro areas, it reveals two unjustified assumptions behind the mandate: traffic lanes must maintain continuous alignment even with limited, slow traffic; and parking demand must be satisfied with dedicated parking lanes in absence of price. The mandate is likely to force markets to oversupply parking and undersupply housing. The paper calls for removal of the parking mandate from Street standards and deregulation of the Residential Street parking market. Language: en

  • Residential Street Parking and Car Ownership
    Journal of the American Planning Association, 2013
    Co-Authors: Zhan Guo
    Abstract:

    Problem, research strategy, and findings: Local governments' minimum Street-width standards may force developers to oversupply, and residents to pay excessively for, on-Street parking in Residential neighborhoods. Such oversupply is often presumed to both encourage car ownership and reduce housing affordability, although little useful evidence exists either way. This article examines the impact of Street-parking supply on the car ownership of households with off-Street parking in the New York City area. The off- and on-Street parking supply for each household was measured through Google Street View and Bing Maps. The impact of on-Street parking on car ownership levels was then estimated in an innovative multivariate model. The unique set-up of the case study ensures 1) the weak endogeneity between parking supply and car ownership and 2) the low correlation between off-Street and on-Street parking supply, two major methodological challenges of the study. Results show that free Residential Street parking increases private car ownership by nearly 9%; that is, the availability of free Street parking explains 1 out of 11 cars owned by households with off-Street parking. Takeaway for practice: These results offer support for community Street standards that make on-Street parking supply optional. They also suggest the merits of leaving the decisions of whether, and how many, on-Street parking spaces to provide in new Residential developments to private markets rather than regulations. Research support: This project was supported by grants from the University Transportation Research Center (Region 2) and the Wagner School Faculty Research Fund.

  • Amenity Versus Necessity: Rethinking Residential Street Width Standard as U.S. Parking Policy
    2013
    Co-Authors: Zhan Guo
    Abstract:

    This paper explores the rationales underlying the use of minimum Street width requirements to mandate Street parking. A survey of 97 cities reveals that this mandate is not a technical necessity based on safety concerns or an amenity reflecting market demand, two common beliefs held by decision-makers. Many residents are likely unwilling to pay for Street parking if it is unbundled from housing. The hidden parking policies should be made transparent and subject to public oversight, the double standard between private and public Streets should be eliminated, and parking on Residential Streets should be optional.

Eran Ben-joseph - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • CHANGING THE Residential Street SCENE: ADAPTING THE SHARED Street (WOONERF) CONCEPT TO THE SUBURBAN ENVIRONMENT
    Journal of the American Planning Association, 1995
    Co-Authors: Eran Ben-joseph
    Abstract:

    Abstract In the 1970s, the Dutch city of Delft adopted a new Residential Street layout. Its fundamental concept was the antithesis of the notion of segregating pedestrians and vehicles. It emphasized integration of traffic and pedestrian activity as a positive principle for Street planning. The shared Street approach was later systematized by local agencies and given legal status by the national government. This new concept has drawn global attention, and similar Street designs are appearing not only in Europe, but also in Japan, Australia, and Israel. The shared Street concept's adaptability to different countries and societies reinforces its status as a valid, flexible choice for Residential Street layouts. Studies and surveys of shared Streets in these countries have found considerable reductions in traffic accidents, increased social interaction and play, and a high degree of satisfaction by the residents. The available data and the successful implementation of the shared Street in other countries can...

Sujay Davuluri - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Development and Testing of a Vehicle/Pedestrian Collision Model for Neighborhood Traffic Control
    2002
    Co-Authors: Gary A. Davis, Kate Sanderson, Sujay Davuluri
    Abstract:

    This report presents an approach to assess the effect of vehicle traffic volumes and speeds on pedestrian safety. It shows that the probability of standardized pedestrian conflict resulting in a collision can be computed given data on the distribution of vehicle speeds and headways on a Residential Street. Researchers applied this method to data collected on a sample of 25 Residential Streets in the Twin Cities and found that collision rates varied between 4 and 64 collisions per 1,000 pedestrian conflicts, depending primarily on the Street's traffic volume. Using a model that relates the impact speed of a vehicle to the severity of pedestrian injury, they computed the probabilities of a severe collision. Sensitive to both traffic volume and traffic speed, the severe collision rate varied between 1 and 25 collisions per 1,000 conflicts. Using the same data, researchers also computed the crash reduction factor, used to assess the potential safety effect of a 25 miles per hour speed limit on the sample of Residential Streets. The estimated crash reductions ranged between .2% and 45%, depending primarily on the degree to which the vehicle speeds currently exceeded 25 miles per hour. Researchers also showed how this computation assists with the reconstruction of actual vehicle/pedestrian collisions.

  • development and testing of a vehicle pedestrian collision model for neighborhood traffic control
    2002
    Co-Authors: Gary A. Davis, Kate Sanderson, Sujay Davuluri
    Abstract:

    This report presents an approach to assess the effect of vehicle traffic volumes and speeds on pedestrian safety. It shows that the probability of standardized pedestrian conflict resulting in a collision can be computed given data on the distribution of vehicle speeds and headways on a Residential Street. Researchers applied this method to data collected on a sample of 25 Residential Streets in the Twin Cities and found that collision rates varied between 4 and 64 collisions per 1,000 pedestrian conflicts, depending primarily on the Street's traffic volume. Using a model that relates the impact speed of a vehicle to the severity of pedestrian injury, they computed the probabilities of a severe collision. Sensitive to both traffic volume and traffic speed, the severe collision rate varied between 1 and 25 collisions per 1,000 conflicts. Using the same data, researchers also computed the crash reduction factor, used to assess the potential safety effect of a 25 miles per hour speed limit on the sample of Residential Streets. The estimated crash reductions ranged between .2% and 45%, depending primarily on the degree to which the vehicle speeds currently exceeded 25 miles per hour. Researchers also showed how this computation assists with the reconstruction of actual vehicle/pedestrian collisions.

R Ewing - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

J G Vogtlander - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • eco efficient value creation of Residential Street lighting systems by simultaneously analysing the value the costs and the eco costs during the design and engineering phase
    Energies, 2020
    Co-Authors: Nine Klaassen, Arno Scheepens, Bas Flipsen, J G Vogtlander
    Abstract:

    In search of sustainable business models, product innovation must fulfil a double objective: the new product must have a higher (market) value, and at the same time a lower eco-burden. To achieve this objective, it is an imperative that the value, the total costs of ownership, and the eco-burden of a product are analysed at the beginning of the design process (idea generation and concept development). The design approach that supports such a design objective, is called Eco-efficient Value Creation (EVC). This approach is characterised by a two-dimensional representation: the eco-burden at the y-axis and the costs or the value at the x-axis. The value is either the Willingness to Pay or the market price. The eco-burden is expressed in eco-costs, a monetised single indicator in LCA (Life Cycle Assessment): an app for IOS and Android, and excel look-up tables at the internet, enable quick assessment of eco-costs. A practical example is given: the design of a new concept of domestic Street lighting system for the city of Rotterdam. This new concept results in a considerable reduction of carbon footprint and eco-costs, and shows the benefits for the municipality and for the residents, resulting in a viable business case.