The Experts below are selected from a list of 57072 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
García Echevarría Santiago - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Walter Eucken’s work from today’s perspective: his contribution to euro-economic thinking
Universidad de Alcalá. Instituto de dirección y Organización de Empresas, 2018Co-Authors: García Echevarría SantiagoAbstract:La obra de Walter Eucken, creador, entre otros, de la Escuela de Friburgo del pensamiento económico europeo constituye una nueva conceptualización de la economía en la Sociedad. En parte fue en su día una respuesta al Keynesianismo, en la actualidad es una respuesta a la corriente dominante neoclasicista de la economía. Solo de la economía basada en el “homo oeconomicos” y configuradora de la economía en torno al desarrollo de la persona en un gran cambio metodológico en la forma de entender la economía en el contexto del Orden Societario. La nueva conceptualización no solo implica otra forma diferente en el planteamiento económico, sino que integra la Política Económica en la Política Societaria, asumiendo el sistema de valores en la determinación del Orden de la Economía: se busca la “eficiencia económica”, por un lado, y la actuación de la persona en el marco de la “dignidad humana” por el otro. Es el pensamiento económico centroeuropeo que fue la base de la Economía Social de Mercado como Orden de la Economía y su reflejo en la propia Doctrina Social de la Iglesia. Es el Orden de la economía Europea sobre la que debe construirse en el futuro el desarrollo de la persona en los nuevos contextos societarios.The work of Walter Eucken, who, among other achievements, founded the Freiburg School of European economic thinking, is a new conceptualisation of the Economy in Society. In its time, this was partly a response to Keynesianism; today it is a response to the prevailing neo-Classical economic trends. Eucken regards the Economy as being based upon homo oeconomicus ; this is an Economy that requires a great methodological change in how one understands the Economy within the context of the Societal Order. Not only does this new conceptualisation imply a new way of approaching the Economy; it also integrates Economic Policy into Societal Politics, taking on a values system when determining the Economic Order. On the one hand, the goal is economic efficiency and on the other it is the individuals’ action within a framework of human dignity. This, then, is the Central European train of thought that underlies the Social Market Economy as an Economic Order and a reflection in the Roman Catholic Church’s Social Doctrine. This is the European Economic Order – the foundations upon which the future development of the individual in new Societal contexts must be raised
-
The socio-economic impact of automatisation. Keys of the organisational design
Universidad de Alcalá. Instituto de dirección y Organización de Empresas, 2018Co-Authors: García Echevarría SantiagoAbstract:Los procesos de digitalización y el inicio de los desarrollos de Inteligencia Artificial implican uno de los grandes cambios en nuestra Cultura caracterizada por la división de trabajo. Junto al ya asentado proceso de globalización de los procesos económico-sociales el desarrollo de los conocimientos y de las nuevas tecnologías sientan las bases de un cambio profundo de la forma de concretar, diseñar y actuar en los procesos económicos. Lo que afecta de forma primaria a la dimensión socio-económica de nuestra Sociedad, con grandes cambios en su estructura que afecta de forma directa tanto a las empresas y demás Instituciones de la Sociedad con una profunda incidencia en el desarrollo de la persona. Este proceso de transformación iniciado y aún en sus primeras etapas abre nuevas formas de concebir el papel de la persona en la realidad económico-societaria. En esta aportación se centra el análisis del “impacto” de la digitalización en las estructuras económico-sociales, así como en la empresa, como la Institución clave en la recepción de este cambio, teniendo en cuenta la repercusión en el desarrollo de la persona. Lo que exige adentrarse en la concepción del Orden Económico-Societario mediante el marco Institucional que no solo recoge el Orden Económico, sino también el societario antes de que se produzcan las “nuevas cuestiones sociales” que eviten las crisis que inciden en el desarrollo integral de las personas. No hay crecimiento económico sin progreso en el conocimiento y en el desarrollo de nuevas tecnologías, condición clave para el incremento necesario de la productividad del trabajo como condición para el desarrollo de la persona, fin último de la transformación de la acción de la persona en base a la digitalización. Es la gran oportunidad para centrar la “realidad económica” en el desarrollo de la persona, siendo ésta la que debe actuar de forma prioritaria en los procesos digitalizadores y su aportación al desarrollo humano. Este es el gran reto de nuestra Sociedad.Both digitisation and the dawn of the development of Artificial Intelligence constitute a great change in our Culture which is characterised by the division of labour. Together with economic and social globalisation of – a process that is now well-established – the development of know-how and new technologies are laying the foundation for a profound change with regard to designing, concretising and acting in economic processes. This primarily affects the socio-economic dimension of our Society, with great structural changes which affect directly both businesses and other Institutions in Society which in turn will have a deep effect upon the development of the individual. This process of transformation has begun and, although still in its infancy, opens up new ways of conceiving the role of the individual in economic-Societal reality. This contribution concentrates on analysing the impact of digitisation upon economic and social structures as well as upon business as the key Institution in welcoming this change, bearing in mind its repercussions upon the development of the individual. This requires a deeper examination of our conception of the Economic-Societal Order through the Institutional framework that does not only include the Economic Order, but also the Societal Order before new social questions arise, avoiding the crises which will affect the integrated development of the individual. There is no economic growth without advances in knowledge and the development of new technologies, key conditions for the necessary increase in productivity in work as a precondition for the development of the individual which is, after all, the ultimate aim of the transformation of the individual’s action as a result of digitisation This is a great opportunity to focus the economic reality upon the development of the individual. It is a priority that this economic reality must take action in the processes of digitisation and its contribution to human development. Such is the great challenge facing our Society
Dmitry, Vladimirovich Rakhinsky - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Existential and Archetypal Architectonics of Social (Societal) Order
'Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering and Sciences Engineering and Sciences Publication - BEIESP', 2020Co-Authors: Alexander, Pavlovich Pavlov, Pavel, Aleksandrovich Pavlov, Denis, Vladimirovich Lvov, Alexey, Sergeevich Novikov, Irina, Georgievna Sinkovskaya, Dmitry, Vladimirovich RakhinskyAbstract:Текст статьи не публикуется в открытом доступе в соответствии с политикой журнала.The article deals with the modern Order (world Order) in the context of modern social reality. This is due to the need to identify and diagnose the current socio-cultural situation in the world. It is suggested that modern social and socio-political Orders, as well as world Order patterns and mechanisms, are unable to reproduce the value identity of societies. This is partly due to the disruption of the "super doctrines", "pictures of the world", which for many centuries held social identity around a common substantive core, namely, national, religious, or political ideology. The article also discusses the role of individuals in the course of social reproduction, as well as presents general arguments about the increasing role of the human factor and the need for more efficient use of human capital
Gérard Caroline - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Les droits de la personne âgée : proposition d'un statut de post-majorité
HAL CCSD, 2018Co-Authors: Gérard CarolineAbstract:The lengthening of life expectancy sybstantially changes the Societal Order. Older people make up an ever-increasing share of the population and are now the receiving special attention from both public and private actors. The society is at the gates of its silver mutation. Yet the legal discipline seems refractory the the idea of a specific apprehension of old age. If a particular care is already given to the elderly in many areas, it is only in a piecemeal and sparse way. Adapting the rigth to ageing cannot be satisfied with simple adjustments. The protection of the elderly person is now under the prism of a common protection where age is only little takin into account. In any other measure, the older person can also be protected though the legal protection mechanisms of adults. Again, age is not considered a criterion of protection. This relative negation of the advanced age criterion as a source of protection is not adapted to demographic change. Old age should be protected for itself and every major must be assurez of the respect of her rights and the best maintenance of her legal capacity throughout his life. It is for this reason that this thesis proposes a reorientation of the norm in favour of old age. Such an evolution could give society a chance to adapt to its own ageing and to take the real measure. The insertion of a post-majority, conceived as a new general time of existence, carries the promise of widespread protection of old age and proposes a new balance between capacity and protection. The aim is to secure the expression and respect for the will during the period of old age, while stimulating the intergenerational interdependence that is essential to the mobilization of the whole society for the benefit of elderly.L’allongement de l’espérance de vie modifie substantiellement l’ordre sociétal. Les personnes âgées composent une part toujours plus grande de la population et font désormais l’objet d’une attention particulière de la part des politiques publiques comme des acteurs privés. La société est aux portes de sa silver mutation. Pourtant la discipline juridique semble réfractaire à l’idée d’une appréhension spécifique de la vieillesse. Si un soin particulier est d’ores et déjà apporté aux personnes âgées dans de nombreux domaines, ce n’est que de façon parcellaire et éparse. L’adaptation du droit au vieillissement ne pourra se contenter de simples ajustements. La protection de la personne âgée se fait aujourd’hui sous le prisme d’une protection commune où l’âge n’est que peu pris en compte. Dans une toute autre mesure, la personne âgée peut également être protégée via les mécanismes de protection juridique des majeurs. Là encore, l’âge n’est pas considéré comme un critère de protection. Cette négation relative du critère de l’âge avancé comme source d’une protection n’est pas adaptée à l’évolution démographique. La vieillesse devrait être protégée pour elle-même et tout majeur doit être assuré du respect de ses droits et du maintien maximal de sa capacité juridique tout au long de sa vie. C’est pour cette raison que cette thèse propose une réorientation de la norme au profit de la vieillesse. Une pareille évolution pourrait offrir à la société une chance de s’adapter à son propre vieillissement et d’en prendre la réelle mesure. L’insertion d’une post-majorité, conçue comme un nouveau temps général de l’existence, porte la promesse d’une protection diffuse et généralisée de la vieillesse et propose un équilibre nouveau entre capacité et protection. L’objectif poursuivi est de sécuriser l’expression et le respect de la volonté durant la période de vieillesse, tout en stimulant les interdépendances intergénérationnelles qui sont essentielles à la mobilisation de la société en son entier au profit des personnes âgées
Alexander, Pavlovich Pavlov - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Existential and Archetypal Architectonics of Social (Societal) Order
'Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering and Sciences Engineering and Sciences Publication - BEIESP', 2020Co-Authors: Alexander, Pavlovich Pavlov, Pavel, Aleksandrovich Pavlov, Denis, Vladimirovich Lvov, Alexey, Sergeevich Novikov, Irina, Georgievna Sinkovskaya, Dmitry, Vladimirovich RakhinskyAbstract:Текст статьи не публикуется в открытом доступе в соответствии с политикой журнала.The article deals with the modern Order (world Order) in the context of modern social reality. This is due to the need to identify and diagnose the current socio-cultural situation in the world. It is suggested that modern social and socio-political Orders, as well as world Order patterns and mechanisms, are unable to reproduce the value identity of societies. This is partly due to the disruption of the "super doctrines", "pictures of the world", which for many centuries held social identity around a common substantive core, namely, national, religious, or political ideology. The article also discusses the role of individuals in the course of social reproduction, as well as presents general arguments about the increasing role of the human factor and the need for more efficient use of human capital
Joseph E Earley - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
process structural realism instance ontology and Societal Order
2008Co-Authors: Joseph E EarleyAbstract:Whitehead’s cosmology centers on the self-creation of actual occasions that perish as they come to be, but somehow do combine to constitute societies that are persistent agents and/or patients. “Instance Ontology” developed by D.W. Mertz concerns unification of relata into facts of relatedness by specific intensions. These two conceptual systems are similar in that they both avoid the substance-property distinction: they differ in their understanding of how basic units combine to constitute complex unities. “Process Structural Realism” (PSR) draws from both of these approaches in developing an account of how combinations of processes may produce ontologically significant coherences. When a group of processes achieves such closure that a set of states recurs continually, the effects of that coherence differ from what would occur in the absence of that closure. Such altered effectiveness is an attribute of the system as a whole, and would have consequences. This indicates that the network of processes, as a unit, has ontological significance. The closed network of processes, together with the conditions that prevail, constitute the form of definiteness of the coherence. That form continues to obtain as long as the coherence persists. Constituents contribute to, rather than share, that characteristic. Aspects of some recent research in systems biology, microeconomics, and social psychology illustrate the application of PSR.