The Experts below are selected from a list of 329043 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Rocha, Cleidson De Jesus - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Educação e emancipação na teoria crítica da sociedade de Theodor W. Adorno
    'Griot Revista de Filosofia', 2019
    Co-Authors: Rocha, Cleidson De Jesus
    Abstract:

    This article presents the contribution of Theodor W. Adorno to the configuration of an education capable of confronting contemporary irrationalism, through a resumption of the definition of dialectics as a critic of philosophical thought. It has modernly limited itself to rationalizing rationality to the highest power, without dwelling on the effects of its unfulfilled promises. The work of Adorno is recognized by a propensity according to which it is the responsibility of philosophy to critically reflect and clarify the way culture organizes itself. Such a proposition leads to a theoretical project that presupposes an awareness of the misconceptions of reason, in an attempt that, through enlightenment, man can construct possibilities of autonomy and emancipation. The article is organized in two parts, as follows: 1. Theorical-practical ambitions of the critical Theory of Society and 2) The threads that weave TW Adorno's critical Theory, divided into three topics: a) The general cultural climate of late capitalism - the propensity for barbarism; b) Bankruptcy of culture - objective reason of barbarism; c) Reflexes of damaged life: the sickness of contact

  • Educação e emancipação na teoria crítica da sociedade de Theodor W. Adorno
    2019
    Co-Authors: Rocha, Cleidson De Jesus
    Abstract:

    This article presents the contribution of Theodor W. Adorno to the configuration of an education capable of confronting contemporary irrationalism, through a resumption of the definition of dialectics as a critic of philosophical thought. It has modernly limited itself to rationalizing rationality to the highest power, without dwelling on the effects of its unfulfilled promises. The work of Adorno is recognized by a propensity according to which it is the responsibility of philosophy to critically reflect and clarify the way culture organizes itself. Such a proposition leads to a theoretical project that presupposes an awareness of the misconceptions of reason, in an attempt that, through enlightenment, man can construct possibilities of autonomy and emancipation. The article is organized in two parts, as follows: 1. Theorical-practical ambitions of the critical Theory of Society and 2) The threads that weave TW Adorno's critical Theory, divided into three topics: a) The general cultural climate of late capitalism - the propensity for barbarism; b) Bankruptcy of culture - objective reason of barbarism; c) Reflexes of damaged life: the sickness of contact.Este artigo apresenta a contribuição de Theodor W. Adorno para a configuração de uma educação capaz de enfrentar os irracionalismos contemporâneos, por meio de uma retomada da definição da dialética como crítica do pensamento filosófico. Este tem, modernamente, se limitado a enlevar a racionalidade à máxima potência, sem se debruçar sobre os efeitos de suas promessas não cumpridas. A obra de Adorno é reconhecida por uma propugnação segundo a qual cabe à filosofia a tarefa da reflexão crítica e do esclarecimento da forma como a cultura se organiza. Tal proposição leva a um projeto teórico que pressupõe a tomada de consciência sobre os descaminhos da razão, numa tentativa de que, por intermédio do esclarecimento, o homem possa construir possibilidades de autonomia e emancipação. O artigo se organiza em duas partes, assim apresentados: 1. Ambições tórico-práticas da teoria crítica da sociedade e 2) Fios que tecem a teoria crítica de T. W. Adorno, este dividido em três tópicos: a) O clima cultural geral do capitalismo tardio - a propensão à barbárie; b) Falência da cultura - razão objetiva da barbárie; c) Reflexos da vida danificada: o adoecimento do contato

  • Education and emancipation in the critical Theory of the Society of Theodor W. Adorno
    2019
    Co-Authors: Rocha, Cleidson De Jesus
    Abstract:

    Este artigo apresenta a contribuição de Theodor W. Adorno para a configuração de uma educação capaz de enfrentar os irracionalismos contemporâneos, por meio de uma retomada da definição da dialética como crítica do pensamento filosófico. Este tem, modernamente, se limitado a enlevar a racionalidade à máxima potência, sem se debruçar sobre os efeitos de suas promessas não cumpridas. A obra de Adorno é reconhecida por uma propugnação segundo a qual cabe à filosofia a tarefa da reflexão crítica e do esclarecimento da forma como a cultura se organiza. Tal proposição leva a um projeto teórico que pressupõe a tomada de consciência sobre os descaminhos da razão, numa tentativa de que, por intermédio do esclarecimento, o homem possa construir possibilidades de autonomia e emancipação. O artigo se organiza em duas partes, assim apresentados: 1. Ambições tórico-práticas da teoria crítica da sociedade e 2) Fios que tecem a teoria crítica de T. W. Adorno, este dividido em três tópicos: a) O clima cultural geral do capitalismo tardio - a propensão à barbárie; b) Falência da cultura - razão objetiva da barbárie; c) Reflexos da vida danificada: o adoecimento do contato.This article presents the contribution of Theodor W. Adorno to the configuration of an education capable of confronting contemporary irrationalism, through a resumption of the definition of dialectics as a critic of philosophical thought. It has modernly limited itself to rationalizing rationality to the highest power, without dwelling on the effects of its unfulfilled promises. The work of Adorno is recognized by a propensity according to which it is the responsibility of philosophy to critically reflect and clarify the way culture organizes itself. Such a proposition leads to a theoretical project that presupposes an awareness of the misconceptions of reason, in an attempt that, through enlightenment, man can construct possibilities of autonomy and emancipation. The article is organized in two parts, as follows: 1. Theorical-practical ambitions of the critical Theory of Society and 2) The threads that weave TW Adorno's critical Theory, divided into three topics: a) The general cultural climate of late capitalism - the propensity for barbarism; b) Bankruptcy of culture - objective reason of barbarism; c) Reflexes of damaged life: the sickness of contact

Adilson Paes De ,souza - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • The police officer who kills: a study on the lethality practiced by military police officers of the Sao Paulo State Military Police
    'Universidade de Sao Paulo Agencia USP de Gestao da Informacao Academica (AGUIA)', 2020
    Co-Authors: Adilson Paes De ,souza
    Abstract:

    A Polícia Militar do Estado de São Paulo (PMESP) é uma das polícias militares do Brasil que apresenta um dos mais elevados índices de letalidade decorrente de suas ações e é também uma das polícias que mais mata pessoas no mundo. Esta tese tem como objetivo refletir sobre as determinantes presentes no fenômeno da letalidade policial na PMESP, nos âmbitos social, institucional e subjetivo e suas consequências na vida social e no adoecimento do policial militar. Como fontes de pesquisa há duas entrevistas semi estruturadas, realizadas com policiais militares da PMESP; nove relatos de policiais, publicados em outros trabalhos de pesquisa; além do relato autobiográfico do autor, enquanto oficial da PMESP. A análise foi fundamentada na teoria crítica da sociedade e na teoria da psicodinâmica do trabalho. Como resultado, verificou-se que o processo de militarização da polícia militar, a educação policial, o discurso de guerra e de eliminação do inimigo, e a organização de trabalho na PMESP, geram fortes tensões, ansiedade e sofrimento aos policiais militares, levando à necessidade de produção de mecanismos de defesa, o que se relaciona com a alta incidência da letalidade e os altos índices de suicídio entre os policiais. Na conclusão deste trabalho ganha relevo a ideia de que o enfrentamento da letalidade policial não se reduz ao problema da impunidade. É necessário impedir que as condições que geram esta letalidade continuem existindo. Algumas ações para o enfrentamento da letalidade são sugeridas, tais como: a revogação de dispositivos legais que permitem a existência e a atuação da polícia militar de forma letal e sem o efetivo controle da sociedade; a reforma do sistema educacional da PMESP; a realização de mais pesquisas que auxiliem no entendimento do problema da letalidade policial e que possam apontar caminhos para a sua superaçãoThe Sao Paulo State Military Police (SPSMP) are among the military police in Brazil that have one of the highest lethality rates resulting from their actions and are also among the police that kill the most around the world. This thesis aims to reflect on the determinants present in the phenomenon of police lethality at SPSMP in the social, institutional and subjective spheres and its consequences on social life and the illness of the military police officers. Research sources include two semi-structured interviews, conducted with military police officers from SPSMP, nine police reports published in other research papers in addition to my autobiographical account as a police officer. The analysis was based on the critical Theory of Society and the psychodynamics Theory of work. As a result, it was found that the militarization process of the military police, the police education, the discourse of war and the elimination of the enemy as well as the organization of work at SPSMP generate strong tensions, anxiety and suffering for the military police officers, leading to the production of defense mechanisms, which is related to the high incidence of lethality and high rates of police officers suicide. As a conclusion, the idea that coping with police lethality is not reduced to the problem of impunity is emphasized. It is, rather, necessary to prevent the conditions that generate this lethality from continuing to exist. And some actions are suggested, such as: the repeal of legal provisions that allow the existence and operation of the military police in a lethal manner and without effective control by Society, the reform of the SPSMP educational system as well as further research that helps to understand the problem of the police lethality and that can point out ways to overcome i

Maria Zeneide Carneiro Magalhães De ,almeida - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Theodor Adorno’s reflections and contributions to education studies
    2020
    Co-Authors: Bressanin, César Evangelista Fernandes, Maria Zeneide Carneiro Magalhães De ,almeida
    Abstract:

    Neste artigo trataremos de entender quais foram as principais propostas de Theodor W. Adorno, filósofo alemão e membro da Escola de Frankfurt, para a educação de seu tempo. A partir de uma análise, mesmo que marginal, de parte do conjunto substancial de seus escritos, palestras, entrevistas e debates, sobretudo da obra em conjunto com Horkheimer, “Dialética do Esclarecimento” e dos ensaios de “Educação e Emancipação”, este texto evidencia os pressupostos do pensamento adorniano, pautado na teoria crítica da sociedade, e elucida suas reflexões na tentativa de propor que a educação fosse mais política e baseada no esclarecimento e na emancipação. Modicamente, buscamos pensar a atualidade e a urgência de suas reflexões para o campo educacional contemporâneo.In this article we will try to understand what were the main proposals of Theodor W. Adorno, German philosopher and member of the Frankfurt School, for the education of his time. From an analysis, even if marginal, of part of the substantial set of his writings, lectures, interviews and debates, especially the work in conjunction with Horkheimer, “Dialectic of Enlightenment” and the essays of “Education and Emancipation”, this text highlights the assumptions of the Adornian thought, based on the critical Theory of Society, and elucidates its reflections in an attempt to propose another education, one that was more political and based on enlightenment and emancipation. We also seek to think about the timeliness and urgency of their reflections for the contemporary educational field

García Garriga Javier - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Crítica de la categoría de consenso a partir de la lectura de Rawls y Habermas
    'Edicions de la Universitat de Barcelona', 2020
    Co-Authors: García Garriga Javier
    Abstract:

    [spa] A lo largo de esta investigación nos proponemos demostrar cómo la categoría de consenso se emplea en la filosofía política liberal para impedir que las consideraciones de tipo económico-político sean tomadas en cuenta en la configuración o deliberación pública acerca del mejor modo de ordenar la vida en común; y para evitar, con ello, que eventualmente se genere un conflicto que atente contra los cimientos de las sociedades capitalistas típicamente occidentales. Dos de los más reputados filósofos de Occidente, John Rawls y Jürgen Habermas, han elaborado buena parte de su producción teórica alrededor de esta categoría. Del primero se ha dicho que el suyo es «el intento más sistemático y persistente de nuestro tiempo por revitalizar la oferta moral y política del liberalismo»; la obra del segundo es asimismo paradigmática de todo planteamiento filosófico-político y jurídico que se aproxime al estudio de la democracia contemporánea, y aun de aquellos proyectos que quisieran restablecer los postulados de una teoría crítica de la sociedad. En estas páginas nos sumergimos en el corpus teórico de ambos autores (especialmente en el de Habermas, más sofisticado, vasto y complejo que el de Rawls y considerado comúnmente como un contradictor situado en la otra orilla del liberalismo) para tratar de confirmar nuestra hipótesis según la cual ambos representan sendas versiones (por un lado una comunidad de valores más o menos homogénea, por el otro un orden diverso pero normativamente pacificado) de un liberalismo que, en todo caso, se presenta como una única promesa de estabilidad política.[eng] Throughout this investigation we propose to demonstrate how the category of consensus is used in liberal political philosophy to prevent economic-political considerations from being taken into account in the public configuration or deliberation about the best way of ordering life in common; and to avoid, with it, that eventually a conflict is generated that threatens the foundations of typically Western capitalist societies. Two of the most renowned Western philosophers, John Rawls and Jürgen Habermas, have produced much of their theoretical production around this category. From the first it has been said that his is "the most systematic and persistent attempt of our time to revitalize the moral and political offer of liberalism"; the work of the second is also paradigmatic of any philosophical-political and legal approach that approximates the study of contemporary democracy, and even of those projects that would like to restore the postulates of a critical Theory of Society. In these pages we immerse ourselves in the theoretical corpus of both authors (especially in Habermas, more sophisticated, vast and complex than Rawls's and commonly considered as a contradictor located on the other side of liberalism) to try to confirm our hypothesis according to which both represent two versions (on the one hand, a community of more or less homogeneous values; on the other, a diverse but normatively pacified order) of a liberalism that, in any case, is presented as a single promise of political stability

Bill Hillier - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Society seen through the prism of space: outline of a Theory of Society and space
    URBAN DESIGN International, 2002
    Co-Authors: Bill Hillier, Vinicius Netto
    Abstract:

    Two questions challenge the student of space and Society above all others: will new technologies change the spatial basis of Society? And if so, will this have an impact on Society itself? For the urbanist, these two questions crystallise into one: what will the future of cities have to do with their past? Too often these questions are dealt with as though they were only matters of technology. However, they are much more than that. They are deep and difficult questions about the interdependence of technology, space and Society that we do not yet have the theoretical apparatus to answer. We know that previous ‘revolutions’ in technology such as agriculture, urbanism and industrialisation associated radical changes in space with no less radical changes in social institutions. However, we do not know how far these linkages were contingent or necessary. We do not, in short, have a Theory of Society and space adequate to account for where we are now, and therefore we have no reasonable theoretical base for speculating about the future. In this paper, I suggest that a major reason for this theoretical deficit is that most previous attempts to build a Theory of Society and space have looked at Society and tried to find space in its output. The result has been that the constructive role of space in creating and sustaining Society has not been brought to the fore, or if it has, only in a way that is too general to permit the detailed specification of mechanisms. In this paper, I try to reverse the normal order of things by looking first at space and trying to discern Society through space: by looking at Society through the prism of space. Through this I try to define key mechanisms linking space to Society and then use these to suggest how the questions about the future of cities and societies might be better defined.

  • Society seen through the prism of space outline of a Theory of Society and space
    In: (Proceedings) 3rd International Space Syntax Symposium. : Atlanta Georgia USA. (2001), 2001
    Co-Authors: Bill Hillier, Vinicius M Netto
    Abstract:

    Two questions challenge the student of space and Society above all others: will new technologies change the spatial basis of Society ? And if so, will this have an impact on Society itself ? For the urbanist, these two questions crystallise into one: what will the future of cities have to do with their past ? Too often these questions are dealt with as though they were only matters of technology. But they are much more than that. They are deep and difficult questions about the interdependence of technology, space and Society that we do not yet have the theoretical apparatus to answer. We know that previous �revolutions� in technology such as agriculture, urbanism and industrialisation associated radical changes in space with no less radical changes in social institutions. But we do not know how far these linkages were contingent or necessary. We do not, in short, have a Theory of Society and space adequate to account for where we are now, and therefore we have no reasonable theoretical base for speculating about the future. In this paper, I suggest that a major reason for this theoretical deficit is that most previous attempts to build a Theory of Society and space have looked at Society and tried to find space in its output. The result has been that the constructive role of space in creating and and sustaining Society has not been brought to the fore, or if it has, only in a way which is too general to permit the detailed specification of mechanisms. In this paper I try to reverse the normal order of things this by looking first at space and trying the discern Society through space: by looking at Society through the prism of space. Through this I try to define key mechanisms linking space to Society and then use these to suggest how the questions about the future of cities and societies might be better defined.