The Experts below are selected from a list of 564 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Janet Treasure - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
OPEN ACCESS Different Patterns of Emotional Eating and Visuospatial Deficits Whereas Shared Risk Factors Related with Social Support
2013Co-Authors: Youl-ri Kim, Between Anorexia Nervosa, Soo-jin Lim, Janet TreasureAbstract:ObjectiveaaAlthough it is thought that eating disorders result from the interplay of personal and sociocultural factors, a comprehensive model of eating disorders remains to be established. The aim of this study was to determine the extent to which the childhood factors and deficit in visuoperceptual ability contribute to eating disorders. MethodsaaA total of 76 participants- 22 women with anorexia nervosa (AN), 28 women with bulimia nervosa (BN), and 26 healthy women of comparable age, IQ, and years of education- were examined. Neuropsychological tasks were applied to measure the visuoperceptual deficits, viz. the Rey-Osterrieth complex figure test and the group embedded figures test (GEFT). A questionnaire designed to obtain retrospective assessments of the childhood risk factors was administered to the participants. ResultsaaThe women with both AN and BN were less likely to report having supportive figures in their childhood and poor copy accuracy in the Rey-Osterrieth test. The women with AN were more likely to report premorbid anxiety, childhood emotional Undereating and showed poor performances in the GEFT. In the final model, the factors independently contributing to the case status were less social support in childhood as a common factor for both AN and BN, and childhood emotional Undereating and poor ability in the low-level visuospatial processing for AN. ConclusionaaOur results suggest the disturbance in the food-emotion relationship and the deficit in low-level visuospatial processing in people with AN. Lower social support appears to contribute to an increase in vulnerability to both AN and BN
-
Different Patterns of Emotional Eating and Visuospatial Deficits Whereas Shared Risk Factors Related with Social Support between Anorexia Nervosa and Bulimia Nervosa.
Psychiatry investigation, 2010Co-Authors: Youl-ri Kim, Soo-jin Lim, Janet TreasureAbstract:ObjectiveaaAlthough it is thought that eating disorders result from the interplay of personal and sociocultural factors, a comprehensive model of eating disorders remains to be established. The aim of this study was to determine the extent to which the childhood factors and deficit in visuoperceptual ability contribute to eating disorders. MethodsaaA total of 76 participants - 22 women with anorexia nervosa (AN), 28 women with bulimia nervosa (BN), and 26 healthy women of comparable age, IQ, and years of education - were examined. Neuropsychological tasks were applied to measure the visuoperceptual defi cits, viz. the Rey-Osterrieth complex figure test and the group embedded figures test (GEFT). A questionnaire designed to obtain retrospec tive assessments of the childhood risk factors was administered to the participants. ResultsaaThe women with both AN and BN were less likely to report having supportive figures in their childhood and poor copy accuracy in the Rey-Osterrieth test. The women with AN were more likely to report premorbid anxiety, childhood emotional Undereating and showed poor performances in the GEFT. In the final model, the factors independently contributing to the case status were less social support in childhood as a common factor for both AN and BN, and childhood emotional Undereating and poor ability in the low-level visuospatial processing for AN. ConclusionaaOur results suggest the disturbance in the food-emotion relationship and the deficit in low-level visuospatial processing in peo ple with AN. Lower social support appears to contribute to an increase in vulnerability to both AN and BN. Psychiatry Investig 2011;8:9-14 Key Wordsaa Childhood risk factors, Emotional eating, Visuospatial ability, Anorexia nervosa, Bulimia nervosa.
-
Childhood risk factors in Korean women with anorexia nervosa: two sets of case-control studies with retrospective comparisons.
The International journal of eating disorders, 2009Co-Authors: Youl-ri Kim, Si Young Heo, Heechan Kang, Kijun Song, Janet TreasureAbstract:Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the characteristics of the risk factors for anorexia nervosa (AN) in Korean women. Method: Two sets of case–control comparisons were conducted, in which 52 women with lifetime AN from Seoul, S. Korea, were compared with 108 Korean healthy controls and also with 42 women with lifetime AN from the UK in terms of their childhood risk factors. A questionnaire designed to conduct a retrospective assessment of the childhood risk factors was administered to all participants. Results: The Korean AN women were more likely to report premorbid anxiety, perfectionism, and emotional Undereating and were less likely to report having supportive figures in their childhood than the Korean healthy controls. There were no overall differences in the childhood risk factors between the Korean and British women with AN. Discussion: Premorbid anxiety, perfectionism, less social support, and emotional Undereating merit attention as risk factors in Korean AN. The current results are informative, but an epidemiologically robust prospective case–control study would be needed to validate these findings. © 2009 by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. (Int J Eat Disord 2010;)
-
P02-59 Childhood risk factors in Korean women with anorexia nervosa: Two sets of case-control studies with retrospective comparisons
European Psychiatry, 2009Co-Authors: Youl-ri Kim, Janet TreasureAbstract:Objective The aim of this study was to investigate the characteristics of the risk factors for anorexia nervosa (AN) in East Asian subjects. Method Two sets of case-control comparisons were conducted, in which 33 women with lifetime AN from Seoul, S. Korea, were compared with 42 women with lifetime AN from the UK and also with 90 Korean healthy controls in terms of their childhood risk factors. A questionnaire designed to conduct retrospective assessments of the childhood risk factors was administered to all participants. Results There were no overall differences in the childhood risk factors between the Korean and British women with AN. The Korean AN patients were more likely to report premorbid anxiety, perfectionism and emotional Undereating and were less likely to report having supportive figures in their childhood than the healthy controls. Conclusion Our findings support the theory that AN is not a culture-bound syndrome. Larger epidemiologically based studies would be needed to validate these preliminary findings.
-
Skills-based Learning for Caring for a Loved One with an Eating Disorder : The New Maudsley Method
2007Co-Authors: Janet Treasure, Gráinne Smith, Anna CraneAbstract:Preface. Shifting Responsibility - The Lived Experience of an Eating Disorder. Caring for a Loved One with an Eating Disorder - First Steps. Working with a Joint Understanding of the Illness - Basic Facts about Eating Disorders. Which Kind of Carer are You? Stress, Strain and Developing Resilience. Consequences - Understanding Medical Risk. Understanding Change. Communication. Interpersonal Relationships. Modelling Emotional Intelligence and Problem-solving Skills. Managing Undereating. How to Help with Bingeing and Overeating. Managing Difficult Behaviours. Reflection, Review - and Relaxation.
Klaas R Westerterp - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
physical activity food intake and body weight regulation insights from doubly labeled water studies
Nutrition Reviews, 2010Co-Authors: Klaas R WesterterpAbstract:Body weight and energy balance can be maintained by adapting energy intake to changes in energy expenditure and vice versa, whereas short-term changes in energy expenditure are mainly caused by physical activity. This review investigates whether physical activity is affected by over- and Undereating, whether intake is affected by an increase or a decrease in physical activity, and whether being overweight affects physical activity. The available evidence is based largely on studies that quantified physical activity with doubly labeled water. Overeating does not affect physical activity, while Undereating decreases habitual or voluntary physical activity. Thus, it is easier to gain weight than to lose weight. An exercise-induced increase in energy requirement is typically compensated by increased energy intake, while a change to a more sedentary routine does not induce an equivalent reduction of intake and generally results in weight gain. Overweight and obese subjects tend to have similar activity energy expenditures to lean people despite being more sedentary. There are two ways in which the general population trend towards increasing body weight can be reversed: reduce intake or increase physical activity. The results of the present literature review indicate that eating less is the most effective method for preventing weight gain, despite the potential for a negative effect on physical activity when a negative energy balance is reached.
-
repeated measurement of habitual food intake increases under reporting and induces selective under reporting
British Journal of Nutrition, 2001Co-Authors: Annelies H C Goris, Erwin P Meijer, Klaas R WesterterpAbstract:: Br J Nutr 2001 May;85(5):629-34 Related Articles, Books, LinkOut Repeated measurement of habitual food intake increases under-reporting and induces selective under-reporting. Goris AH, Meijer EP, Westerterp KR. Department of Human Biology, Maastricht University, The Netherlands. annelies.goris@philips.com. The aim of the current study was to measure differences in reporting behaviour between a first occasion of 7 d food recording and a second occasion of 7 d food recording 12 weeks later, in a group of elderly men (n 17) and women (n 17). Half the group followed an exercise intervention. The mean age was 61 (sd 5) years and mean BMI was 26.2 (sd 3.8) kg/m2. Reported energy intake was compared with energy expenditure as calculated from measured BMR and physical activity assessed with a tri-axial accelerometer for movement registration. Total under-reporting was divided into Undereating and under-recording. Undereating was calculated from the change in body mass over the recording week and the under-recording was measured using the water balance technique. In the first period, the total under-reporting was 21 % and increased to 27% in the second period In the first period there was no indication for subjects eating less during the recording week, however, in the second period subjects lost body mass during the food recording indicating Undereating. The amount of under-recording was calculated at 21% in the first period and 18% in the second period of recording (P 0.28). During the second period subjects selectively under-reported their fat intake and over-reported their protein intake. In conclusion, repeated assessment of food intake caused a higher quantitative and a qualitative under-reporting of food intake. The effect of interventions (dietary or otherwise) on habitual food intake might be confounded by changes in food-reporting behaviour.
-
Improved reporting of habitual food intake after confrontation with earlier results on food reporting
British Journal of Nutrition, 2000Co-Authors: Annelies H C Goris, Klaas R WesterterpAbstract:The aim of the present study was to improve the reporting of food intake by confronting subjects with their way of reporting food intake, e.g. under-recording and/or Undereating. To minimize portion size errors, eighteen female dietitians were recruited as subjects. Energy- and water intake were measured for 1 week with a weighed dietary record. Resting metabolic rate was measured with an open-circuit ventilated-hood indirect calorimeter, and physical activity was measured with an accelerometer for movement registration. Water loss was estimated with 2H-labelled water. Energy balance was checked for by measuring empty body-weight 1 week before the start, at the start and at the end of the recording week. In the first part of the study, the change in body weight in the non-recording week was 0·14 kg and in the recording week -0·45 kg (P 0·02), indicating 12 % Undereating. Total water intake closely matched measured water loss, indicating a high recording precision. There was under-reporting of habitual food intake that could be fully explained by Undereating. In the second part of the study, subjects were confronted with these results and the protocol was repeated. This time there was no significant change in body weight in the recording week, indicating no Undereating. The reporting of habitual food intake had been improved. In conclusion, in the studied group of highly motivated lean women, under-reporting of habitual food intake (here due to Undereating) could be eliminated by confrontation with the results of this phenomenon.
-
Undereating and underrecording of habitual food intake in obese men selective underreporting of fat intake
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2000Co-Authors: Annelies H C Goris, Margriet S Westerterpplantenga, Klaas R WesterterpAbstract:Background: Underreporting of food intake is common in obese subjects. Objective: One aim of this study was to assess to what extent underreporting by obese men is explained by underrecording (failure to record in a food diary everything that is consumed) or Undereating. Another aim of the study was to find out whether there was an indication for selective underreporting. Design: Subjects were 30 obese men with a mean (∠ SD) body mass index (in kg/m 2 ) of 34 ∠ 4. Total food intake was measured over 1 wk. Energy expenditure (EE) was measured with the doubly labeled water method, and water loss was estimated with deuterium-labeled water. Energy balance was checked for by measuring body weight at the start and end of the food-recording week and 1 wk after the recording week. Results: Mean energy intake and EE were 10.4 ∠ 2.5 and 16.7 ∠ 2.4 MJ/d, respectively; underreporting was 37 ∠ 16%. The mean body mass loss of 1.0 ∠ 1.3 kg over the recording week was significantly different ( P < 0.05) from the change in body mass over the nonrecording week, and indicated 26% Undereating. Water intake (reported + metabolic water) and water loss were significantly different from each other and indicated 12% underrecording. The reported percentage of energy from fat was a function of the level of underreporting: percentage of energy from fat = 46 ‐ 0.2 3 percentage of underreporting (r 2 = 0.28, P = 0.003). Conclusions: Total underreporting by the obese men was explained by underrecording and Undereating. The obese men selectively underreported fat intake. Am J Clin Nutr 2000;71:130‐4.
-
Underreporting of Habitual Food Intake Is Explained by Undereating in Highly Motivated Lean Women
The Journal of nutrition, 1999Co-Authors: Annelies H C Goris, Klaas R WesterterpAbstract:Underreporting of habitual food intake can be explained by underrecording and/or Undereating. This study was designed to discriminate between the two errors mentioned, by measuring energy and water balance. Twenty-four lean female dieticians were recruited as subjects. Energy intake and water intake were measured for 1 wk with a weighed dietary record. Energy expenditure was estimated from measurements of resting metabolic rate, and measured physical activity with a triaxial accelerometer for movement registration. Water loss was estimated with deuterium-labeled water. Energy balance was determined by measuring the change in body mass over a nonrecording week (preceding the recording week) and over the recording week. Mean energy and water intake were 8.5 +/- 1.0 MJ/d and 2.3 +/- 0.5 L/d. The change in body mass in the nonrecording week was 0.1 +/- 0.6 kg and in the recording week -0.6 +/- 0.8 kg (paired t test; P = 0.02), indicating 16% Undereating. Recorded water intake plus calculated metabolic water closely matched measured water loss (r = 0.93; P = 0.0001), which indicated a high recording precision. In conclusion, in the studied group of highly motivated lean women, there was 16% underreporting of habitual food intake, which could be explained by Undereating.
Youl-ri Kim - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
OPEN ACCESS Different Patterns of Emotional Eating and Visuospatial Deficits Whereas Shared Risk Factors Related with Social Support
2013Co-Authors: Youl-ri Kim, Between Anorexia Nervosa, Soo-jin Lim, Janet TreasureAbstract:ObjectiveaaAlthough it is thought that eating disorders result from the interplay of personal and sociocultural factors, a comprehensive model of eating disorders remains to be established. The aim of this study was to determine the extent to which the childhood factors and deficit in visuoperceptual ability contribute to eating disorders. MethodsaaA total of 76 participants- 22 women with anorexia nervosa (AN), 28 women with bulimia nervosa (BN), and 26 healthy women of comparable age, IQ, and years of education- were examined. Neuropsychological tasks were applied to measure the visuoperceptual deficits, viz. the Rey-Osterrieth complex figure test and the group embedded figures test (GEFT). A questionnaire designed to obtain retrospective assessments of the childhood risk factors was administered to the participants. ResultsaaThe women with both AN and BN were less likely to report having supportive figures in their childhood and poor copy accuracy in the Rey-Osterrieth test. The women with AN were more likely to report premorbid anxiety, childhood emotional Undereating and showed poor performances in the GEFT. In the final model, the factors independently contributing to the case status were less social support in childhood as a common factor for both AN and BN, and childhood emotional Undereating and poor ability in the low-level visuospatial processing for AN. ConclusionaaOur results suggest the disturbance in the food-emotion relationship and the deficit in low-level visuospatial processing in people with AN. Lower social support appears to contribute to an increase in vulnerability to both AN and BN
-
Different Patterns of Emotional Eating and Visuospatial Deficits Whereas Shared Risk Factors Related with Social Support between Anorexia Nervosa and Bulimia Nervosa.
Psychiatry investigation, 2010Co-Authors: Youl-ri Kim, Soo-jin Lim, Janet TreasureAbstract:ObjectiveaaAlthough it is thought that eating disorders result from the interplay of personal and sociocultural factors, a comprehensive model of eating disorders remains to be established. The aim of this study was to determine the extent to which the childhood factors and deficit in visuoperceptual ability contribute to eating disorders. MethodsaaA total of 76 participants - 22 women with anorexia nervosa (AN), 28 women with bulimia nervosa (BN), and 26 healthy women of comparable age, IQ, and years of education - were examined. Neuropsychological tasks were applied to measure the visuoperceptual defi cits, viz. the Rey-Osterrieth complex figure test and the group embedded figures test (GEFT). A questionnaire designed to obtain retrospec tive assessments of the childhood risk factors was administered to the participants. ResultsaaThe women with both AN and BN were less likely to report having supportive figures in their childhood and poor copy accuracy in the Rey-Osterrieth test. The women with AN were more likely to report premorbid anxiety, childhood emotional Undereating and showed poor performances in the GEFT. In the final model, the factors independently contributing to the case status were less social support in childhood as a common factor for both AN and BN, and childhood emotional Undereating and poor ability in the low-level visuospatial processing for AN. ConclusionaaOur results suggest the disturbance in the food-emotion relationship and the deficit in low-level visuospatial processing in peo ple with AN. Lower social support appears to contribute to an increase in vulnerability to both AN and BN. Psychiatry Investig 2011;8:9-14 Key Wordsaa Childhood risk factors, Emotional eating, Visuospatial ability, Anorexia nervosa, Bulimia nervosa.
-
Childhood risk factors in Korean women with anorexia nervosa: two sets of case-control studies with retrospective comparisons.
The International journal of eating disorders, 2009Co-Authors: Youl-ri Kim, Si Young Heo, Heechan Kang, Kijun Song, Janet TreasureAbstract:Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the characteristics of the risk factors for anorexia nervosa (AN) in Korean women. Method: Two sets of case–control comparisons were conducted, in which 52 women with lifetime AN from Seoul, S. Korea, were compared with 108 Korean healthy controls and also with 42 women with lifetime AN from the UK in terms of their childhood risk factors. A questionnaire designed to conduct a retrospective assessment of the childhood risk factors was administered to all participants. Results: The Korean AN women were more likely to report premorbid anxiety, perfectionism, and emotional Undereating and were less likely to report having supportive figures in their childhood than the Korean healthy controls. There were no overall differences in the childhood risk factors between the Korean and British women with AN. Discussion: Premorbid anxiety, perfectionism, less social support, and emotional Undereating merit attention as risk factors in Korean AN. The current results are informative, but an epidemiologically robust prospective case–control study would be needed to validate these findings. © 2009 by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. (Int J Eat Disord 2010;)
-
P02-59 Childhood risk factors in Korean women with anorexia nervosa: Two sets of case-control studies with retrospective comparisons
European Psychiatry, 2009Co-Authors: Youl-ri Kim, Janet TreasureAbstract:Objective The aim of this study was to investigate the characteristics of the risk factors for anorexia nervosa (AN) in East Asian subjects. Method Two sets of case-control comparisons were conducted, in which 33 women with lifetime AN from Seoul, S. Korea, were compared with 42 women with lifetime AN from the UK and also with 90 Korean healthy controls in terms of their childhood risk factors. A questionnaire designed to conduct retrospective assessments of the childhood risk factors was administered to all participants. Results There were no overall differences in the childhood risk factors between the Korean and British women with AN. The Korean AN patients were more likely to report premorbid anxiety, perfectionism and emotional Undereating and were less likely to report having supportive figures in their childhood than the healthy controls. Conclusion Our findings support the theory that AN is not a culture-bound syndrome. Larger epidemiologically based studies would be needed to validate these preliminary findings.
Annelies H C Goris - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
repeated measurement of habitual food intake increases under reporting and induces selective under reporting
British Journal of Nutrition, 2001Co-Authors: Annelies H C Goris, Erwin P Meijer, Klaas R WesterterpAbstract:: Br J Nutr 2001 May;85(5):629-34 Related Articles, Books, LinkOut Repeated measurement of habitual food intake increases under-reporting and induces selective under-reporting. Goris AH, Meijer EP, Westerterp KR. Department of Human Biology, Maastricht University, The Netherlands. annelies.goris@philips.com. The aim of the current study was to measure differences in reporting behaviour between a first occasion of 7 d food recording and a second occasion of 7 d food recording 12 weeks later, in a group of elderly men (n 17) and women (n 17). Half the group followed an exercise intervention. The mean age was 61 (sd 5) years and mean BMI was 26.2 (sd 3.8) kg/m2. Reported energy intake was compared with energy expenditure as calculated from measured BMR and physical activity assessed with a tri-axial accelerometer for movement registration. Total under-reporting was divided into Undereating and under-recording. Undereating was calculated from the change in body mass over the recording week and the under-recording was measured using the water balance technique. In the first period, the total under-reporting was 21 % and increased to 27% in the second period In the first period there was no indication for subjects eating less during the recording week, however, in the second period subjects lost body mass during the food recording indicating Undereating. The amount of under-recording was calculated at 21% in the first period and 18% in the second period of recording (P 0.28). During the second period subjects selectively under-reported their fat intake and over-reported their protein intake. In conclusion, repeated assessment of food intake caused a higher quantitative and a qualitative under-reporting of food intake. The effect of interventions (dietary or otherwise) on habitual food intake might be confounded by changes in food-reporting behaviour.
-
Improved reporting of habitual food intake after confrontation with earlier results on food reporting
British Journal of Nutrition, 2000Co-Authors: Annelies H C Goris, Klaas R WesterterpAbstract:The aim of the present study was to improve the reporting of food intake by confronting subjects with their way of reporting food intake, e.g. under-recording and/or Undereating. To minimize portion size errors, eighteen female dietitians were recruited as subjects. Energy- and water intake were measured for 1 week with a weighed dietary record. Resting metabolic rate was measured with an open-circuit ventilated-hood indirect calorimeter, and physical activity was measured with an accelerometer for movement registration. Water loss was estimated with 2H-labelled water. Energy balance was checked for by measuring empty body-weight 1 week before the start, at the start and at the end of the recording week. In the first part of the study, the change in body weight in the non-recording week was 0·14 kg and in the recording week -0·45 kg (P 0·02), indicating 12 % Undereating. Total water intake closely matched measured water loss, indicating a high recording precision. There was under-reporting of habitual food intake that could be fully explained by Undereating. In the second part of the study, subjects were confronted with these results and the protocol was repeated. This time there was no significant change in body weight in the recording week, indicating no Undereating. The reporting of habitual food intake had been improved. In conclusion, in the studied group of highly motivated lean women, under-reporting of habitual food intake (here due to Undereating) could be eliminated by confrontation with the results of this phenomenon.
-
Undereating and underrecording of habitual food intake in obese men selective underreporting of fat intake
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2000Co-Authors: Annelies H C Goris, Margriet S Westerterpplantenga, Klaas R WesterterpAbstract:Background: Underreporting of food intake is common in obese subjects. Objective: One aim of this study was to assess to what extent underreporting by obese men is explained by underrecording (failure to record in a food diary everything that is consumed) or Undereating. Another aim of the study was to find out whether there was an indication for selective underreporting. Design: Subjects were 30 obese men with a mean (∠ SD) body mass index (in kg/m 2 ) of 34 ∠ 4. Total food intake was measured over 1 wk. Energy expenditure (EE) was measured with the doubly labeled water method, and water loss was estimated with deuterium-labeled water. Energy balance was checked for by measuring body weight at the start and end of the food-recording week and 1 wk after the recording week. Results: Mean energy intake and EE were 10.4 ∠ 2.5 and 16.7 ∠ 2.4 MJ/d, respectively; underreporting was 37 ∠ 16%. The mean body mass loss of 1.0 ∠ 1.3 kg over the recording week was significantly different ( P < 0.05) from the change in body mass over the nonrecording week, and indicated 26% Undereating. Water intake (reported + metabolic water) and water loss were significantly different from each other and indicated 12% underrecording. The reported percentage of energy from fat was a function of the level of underreporting: percentage of energy from fat = 46 ‐ 0.2 3 percentage of underreporting (r 2 = 0.28, P = 0.003). Conclusions: Total underreporting by the obese men was explained by underrecording and Undereating. The obese men selectively underreported fat intake. Am J Clin Nutr 2000;71:130‐4.
-
Underreporting of Habitual Food Intake Is Explained by Undereating in Highly Motivated Lean Women
The Journal of nutrition, 1999Co-Authors: Annelies H C Goris, Klaas R WesterterpAbstract:Underreporting of habitual food intake can be explained by underrecording and/or Undereating. This study was designed to discriminate between the two errors mentioned, by measuring energy and water balance. Twenty-four lean female dieticians were recruited as subjects. Energy intake and water intake were measured for 1 wk with a weighed dietary record. Energy expenditure was estimated from measurements of resting metabolic rate, and measured physical activity with a triaxial accelerometer for movement registration. Water loss was estimated with deuterium-labeled water. Energy balance was determined by measuring the change in body mass over a nonrecording week (preceding the recording week) and over the recording week. Mean energy and water intake were 8.5 +/- 1.0 MJ/d and 2.3 +/- 0.5 L/d. The change in body mass in the nonrecording week was 0.1 +/- 0.6 kg and in the recording week -0.6 +/- 0.8 kg (paired t test; P = 0.02), indicating 16% Undereating. Recorded water intake plus calculated metabolic water closely matched measured water loss (r = 0.93; P = 0.0001), which indicated a high recording precision. In conclusion, in the studied group of highly motivated lean women, there was 16% underreporting of habitual food intake, which could be explained by Undereating.
David Garcia-burgos - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Emotional eating is related with temperament but not with stress biomarkers in preschool children.
Appetite, 2017Co-Authors: Nadine Messerli-bürgy, Kerstin Stülb, Tanja H. Kakebeeke, Amar Arhab, Annina E. Zysset, Claudia S. Leeger-aschmann, Einat A. Schmutz, A. Meyer, Ulrike Ehlert, David Garcia-burgosAbstract:Emotional eating (EE) corresponds to a change in eating behavior in response to distress and results in an increase of food intake (overeating (EOE)) or in food avoidance (Undereating (EUE)). EE has been related to temperament (i.e. negative emotionality) and dysregulated stress biomarkers in school-aged children; parenting has been understood to influence this relationship in older children. The aim of the study was to investigate to which extent stress biomarkers and negative emotionality are related to EE and to understand the role of parenting in this relationship. The sample consisted of 271 children aged 2-6 years of the Swiss cohort study SPLASHY. We assessed the child's EE, negative emotionality and parenting by parent based reports. Salivary samples were collected over two days to analyze cortisol and salivary alpha-amylase levels. From the whole sample of children, 1.1% showed EOE and 32.9% EUE. Negative emotionality was related to EOE and EUE (0.13 (CI 0.06, 021), p 0.05). Similar to a Danish study, parents reported more often EUE than EOE of their child. Both are related to the temperament. Even though the course of EE has not yet been well documented, we conclude that a certain subgroup of children with difficult temperament could be at-risk for eat and weight regulation problems in later childhood.
