Unit Hydrograph

14,000,000 Leading Edge Experts on the ideXlab platform

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

The Experts below are selected from a list of 282 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Lily Montarcih Limantara - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

M M A Shahin - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • regional analysis using the geomorphoclimatic instantaneous Unit Hydrograph
    Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 2001
    Co-Authors: M J Hall, A F Zaki, M M A Shahin
    Abstract:

    Abstract. The construction of design flood Hydrographs for ungauged drainage areas has traditionally been approached by regionalisation, i.e. the transfer of information from the gauged to the ungauged catchments in a region. Such approaches invariably depend upon the use of multiple linear regression analysis to relate Unit Hydrograph parameters to catchment characteristics and generalised rainfall statistics. The concept of the geomorphological instantaneous Unit Hydrograph (GIUH), in relating the shape and scale of the catchment transfer function to stream network topology and channel characteristics, offers an alternative methodology. GIUH derivation depends upon a series of assumptions, including that of estimating a "characteristic velocity"; these continue to attract attention and debate. However, if this velocity is expressed in terms of the kinematic wave approximation, the peak and time-to-peak of the IUH may be expressed in terms of a group of catchment and channel characteristics and the intensity of rainfall excess, giving the so-called geomorphoclimatic IUH (GCIUH). Previous studies involving the GCIUH have developed a single IUH relating to the total duration of rainfall excess. In this study, the rainfall excess duration was divided into several (equal) time increments, with separate IUHs being generated for each interval. This quasi-linear approach was applied to 105 storm events from nine catchments in the south-west of England, ranging in size from 6 to 420 (km)2 . The results showed that, providing the time interval chosen is fine enough to capture the shape of the runoff Hydrographs, a comparable level of goodness-of-fit can be obtained for catchments covering a range of about 1:75 in area. The modified GCIUH approach as described is therefore recommended for further investigation and intercomparison with regression-based regionalisation methods. Keywords: floods; geomorphology; rainfall-runoff modelling

Faustino N Gimena - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • application of a Unit Hydrograph based on subwatershed division and comparison with nash s instantaneous Unit Hydrograph
    Catena, 2005
    Co-Authors: U Agirre, Mikel Goni, Jose Javier Azanza Lopez, Faustino N Gimena
    Abstract:

    Abstract The Unit Hydrograph (UH) technique is widely used for runoff estimation, especially for determining peak discharges. In this paper, a geomorphologically based UH has been applied. Its most remarkable characteristic is that it includes the watershed structure in its formulation. This is defined from the drainage network, each subwatershed being considered as a linear reservoir. In this method, the fact of considering this reservoir sequence according to the drainage network leads to the formulation of the model only depending on a single parameter. The Geomorphological Unit Hydrograph of Reservoirs (GUHR), proposed in this paper, is compared with Nash's Instantaneous Unit Hydrograph (Nash's IUH), by applying the two methods to the Aixola watershed. This 4.7-km2 watershed is located in Gipuzkoa (Northern Spain). It is characteristic of the headwaters watersheds of the area. Most of them are forested and have steep slopes. Annual rainfall is over 1500 mm and many intense rainfall events are observed, among which 18 were selected for this study. Both UH techniques were applied to the rainstorms. The resulting Hydrographs were plotted against registered data and the best fits were determined. According to these results, the GUHR model behaved similarly to Nash's IUH. However, the GUHR method seemed able to reproduce a wider range of rainstorms than Nash's IUH. While analyzing the UHs calculated, seasonal behavior was observed in runoff generation, and different average UHs were proposed for two different periods. This variability was also observed in values adopted by the GUHR model parameter, providing some information about the watershed time response. The dynamic character of the only uncertain parameter, and the model formulation, in which the watershed morphology is reflected, together with the model's simplicity, leads us to consider GUHR as being a promising UH model.

M P Tripathi - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • development of a geomorphological instantaneous Unit Hydrograph model for scantily gauged watersheds
    Environmental Modelling and Software, 2008
    Co-Authors: A Bhadra, N Panigrahy, Rajendra Singh, N S Raghuwanshi, M P Tripathi
    Abstract:

    In recent years, geomorphological instantaneous Unit Hydrograph (GIUH) approach to estimate the runoff from a watershed due to different storm patterns has gained wide acceptability for watersheds with scanty data. In this study, a user-friendly event based computerized GIUH model, GIUH_CAL, was developed. GIUH_CAL model incorporates an infiltration component. Depending on the availability of soil and infiltration data, the model offers a choice among three methods of infiltration calculation, viz., Richards' equation, phi-index method and Philip two term model. The graphical user interface (GUI) of the model is based on mouse-driven approach with pop-up windows, pull-down menus, sub-menus, toolbar, statusbar and button controls including comprehensive context-sensitive help file. GIUH_CAL model displays generated instantaneous Unit Hydrograph (IUH), Unit Hydrograph (UH) and direct runoff Hydrograph (DRH) of the watershed graphically and processes statistically. Modelling efficiency (ME), coefficient of residual mass (CRM), root mean square error (RMSE) and coefficient of determination (r^2) are used as the performance criteria. The model was tested for two distinctly different watersheds, i.e., a 4th order Guptamani watershed in tropical sub-humid region and a 3rd order Upper Chhokeranala watershed in semi-arid region of India. The results show that model performs satisfactorily for both test watersheds and performance is much better with Richards' equation option of infiltration calculation as compared to phi-index method and Philip two term model.Thus, GIUH_CAL model can be adopted as a standard tool for modelling rainfall-runoff transformation process in scantily gauged watersheds.

P. K. Bhunya - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Flood Hydrograph with Synthetic Unit Hydrograph Routing
    Water Resources Management, 2015
    Co-Authors: M. K. Bhuyan, Sanjay Kumar, Joygopal Jena, P. K. Bhunya
    Abstract:

    Synthetic Unit Hydrographs (SUH) based on geomorphology are used as a tool to produce flood Hydrographs from rainfall records, especially in ungauged and partially gauged catchments. This study presents a flood Hydrograph model formulated on SUH based approach using geomorphologic parameters derived from Survey of India maps and geographical information system (GIS) techniques to simulate basin runoff. It uses linear Muskingum routing model in which the routing parameters are determined from the kinematic approach rather than from runoff data. The model employs the Unit Hydrograph suggested by Central Water Commission (CWC) India, as the discharge data from the sub-catchments and routes the concurrent discharges generated from them to the watershed outlet, and compared with the Unit Hydrograph of the lumped catchment. Application of the model is demonstrated by using data of a small watershed in the Mahanadi basin, India. The study indicates the limitations of the CWC Unit Hydrograph approach both in the small hilly and large plane catchments. It is observed that the CWC Unit Hydrograph (UH) underestimates the peak discharges both for catchments smaller than 200 km 2 with steeper slope and larger than 600 km 2 with flatter slope. The study further emphasizes on using two parameter Gamma distribution for preparation of UH curve instead of adopting standard practice of drawing synthetic Unit Hydrograph using seven known points with approximate curve fitting. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

  • synthetic Unit Hydrograph methods a critical review
    The Open Hydrology Journal, 2011
    Co-Authors: P. K. Bhunya
    Abstract:

    The present study critically reviews the synthetic Unit Hydrograph (SUH) methods available in hydrologic lit- erature. The study reveals that the traditional methods of SUH derivation, e.g., Snyder, SCS, traditional methods like Sny- der and TS method that does not yield satisfactory results, and their application to the practical engineering problems is tedious and combursome. On the other hand, probability distribution functions (pdfs) based SUH methods are easy to ap- ply, and easily meet the UH criterion, i.e. the area under the curve is Unity, and rely on a stronger mathematical base and sounder hydrologic perception. The recent pdfs used for deriving UHs in ungauged catchments, address the SUH shapes with more flexibility than the earlier pdfs proposed by (1) for SUH derivation.

  • development of optimal and physically realizable Unit Hydrograph
    Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 2006
    Co-Authors: Sharad K Jain, Vijay P Singh, P. K. Bhunya
    Abstract:

    Optimization techniques for deriving a Unit Hydrograph (UH) have received considerable attention. But the UHs derived in some studies are not physically justifiable as the recession limb has a wavy shape. This study extends an existing optimization model by introducing additional constraints to ensure a monotonic decline in the recession limb of the UH. Although there is a marginal deterioration of the objective function, the shape of the developed UH is physically correct. Moreover, the match between the observed and computed direct surface runoff Hydrographs is close.

  • parameter estimation of beta distribution for Unit Hydrograph derivation
    Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 2004
    Co-Authors: P. K. Bhunya, S K Mishra, C S P Ojha, Ronny Berndtsson
    Abstract:

    Traditionally used methods for developing a synthetic Unit Hydrograph (SUH) are well known for their limitations. In last few decades, use of probability distribution functions in developing SUHs has received much attention. In this study, the potentials of a three-parameter beta distribution are explored. Using a analogy between the three-parameter beta-distribution shape and the SUH shape, approaches are developed to evaluate the unknown parameters. Based on nondimensional analysis and optimization, a simple accurate relation is introduced to estimate the three parameters of the beta distribution that is useful for Unit Hydrograph derivation. The relation yields results closer to those obtained by an available trial and error procedure. The Unit Hydrographs from the proposed method fit observed Hydrographs better than those from the widely used two-parameter gamma distribution. The potential of the approach is demonstrated using data from different catchments lying within and outside India. The methodology is found to work consistently better in most cases.

  • simplified two parameter gamma distribution for derivation of synthetic Unit Hydrograph
    Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 2003
    Co-Authors: P. K. Bhunya, S K Mishra, Ronny Berndtsson
    Abstract:

    Several methods for synthetic Unit Hydrographs are available in the literature. Most of them involve manual, subjective fitting of a Hydrograph through few data points. Because it is difficult, the generated Unit Hydrograph is often left unadjusted for Unit runoff volume. To circumvent this problem, a simplified version of the existing two-parameter gamma distribution is introduced to derive a synthetic Hydrograph more conveniently and accurately than the popular Gray, Soil Conservation Service, and Synder methods. The revised version incorporates the approximate, but accurate, empirical relations developed for the estimation of beta and lambda (factors governing the shape of the dimensionless Unit Hydrograph) from the Nash parameter n (= number of reservoirs). The Marquardt algorithm was used to develop the nonlinear relationships. The applicability of the simplified version is tested on both text and field data. (Less)