The Experts below are selected from a list of 16683 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Fabio R. Chaddad - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Agricultural Cooperatives in netchains
Journal on Chain and Network Science, 2016Co-Authors: Constantine Iliopoulos, Michael L Cook, Fabio R. ChaddadAbstract:This special issue of the Journal on Chain and Network Science on ‘Agricultural Cooperatives in netchains’ includes new research on three research themes: (1) explanation of why are Cooperatives particularly important in certain food netchains; (2) willingness of farmers to invest in their cooperative’s netchain; and (3) the role of ambidexterity in the emergence of multi-stakeholder Cooperatives. The issue is organized into six papers; one editorial and five research papers. The findings reported in this issue inform scholarly work on Agricultural Cooperatives through multiple theoretical lenses and empirical approaches. They also have important managerial and public policy implications.
-
control rights governance and the costs of ownership in Agricultural Cooperatives
Social Science Research Network, 2013Co-Authors: Fabio R. Chaddad, Constantine IliopoulosAbstract:Agricultural Cooperatives have changed considerably in recent decades. In witnessing these structural changes, scholars have proffered analyses of non-traditional ownership models focusing on residual claim rights. As a result, crucial information on the allocation of control rights in Cooperatives is missing. This paper makes a contribution to this literature and shed light on alternative ownership-control models adopted by Agricultural Cooperatives in different regions across the world. In each of these models we describe the allocation of formal control rights and, in particular, the allocation of decision management and decision control rights. In doing so, we provide empirical evidence on the "separation of ownership and control" in Agricultural Cooperatives. We also analyze each of the governance models in terms of the associated ownership costs, including risk bearing costs, the costs of controlling managers, and collective decision making costs. This analysis enable us to identify potential inefficiencies and understand the forces influencing the organizational efficiency and effectiveness of each cooperative model.
-
control rights governance and the costs of ownership in Agricultural Cooperatives
Agribusiness, 2013Co-Authors: Fabio R. Chaddad, Constantine IliopoulosAbstract:Agricultural Cooperatives have changed considerably in recent decades. In witnessing these structural changes, scholars have proffered analyses of nontraditional ownership models focusing on residual claim rights. However, crucial information on the allocation of control rights in Cooperatives is missing. This study sheds light on alternative ownership-control models adopted by Agricultural Cooperatives in different regions across the world. In each of these models, we describe the allocation of formal control rights with a focus on decision management and decision control rights. We thus provide empirical evidence on the “separation of ownership and control” in Agricultural Cooperatives. We also analyze each of the governance models in terms of the associated ownership costs, including risk-bearing costs, the costs of controlling managers, and collective decision-making costs. In doing so, we are able to better understand the forces influencing the organizational efficiency of each cooperative model.
-
testing for the presence of financial constraints in us Agricultural Cooperatives an investment behaviour approach
Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2005Co-Authors: Fabio R. Chaddad, Michael L Cook, Thomas HeckeleiAbstract:This study examines the presence of financial constraints in US Agricultural Cooperatives. We test the cooperative capital constraint hypothesis with a panel data econometric analysis of Agricultural Cooperatives’ investment behaviour. Regression results suggest that Agricultural Cooperatives’ capital expenditures are significantly affected by the availability of internal funds. Results also indicate that the sensitivity of investment to cash flow is correlated with cooperative structural characteristics.
-
testing for the presence of financial constraints in us Agricultural Cooperatives an investment behaviour approach
Social Science Research Network, 2005Co-Authors: Fabio R. Chaddad, Michael L Cook, Thomas HeckeleiAbstract:Agriculture Cooperatives have become animportant means by which independent producers access the markets and achievecompetitive returns.This study explores the financial constraints ofthese Agricultural Cooperatives that result from an inability to obtain therisk capital necessary for investing in productive assets. From the 876 firmsincluded in this analysis, four types of Cooperatives are represented: localfarm supply and grain marketing Cooperatives, processing Cooperatives withoperations in food manufacturing industries, Agricultural production andservice Cooperatives, and Cooperatives involved in wholesale tradeactivity. Cash flow, liquidity, credit risk, and leverage are all shown to have asignificant impact on cooperative investment. The results also demonstrate thatthe larger a cooperative's size the less sensitive investment is to cashflow.Focusing specifically on the food manufacturing industry, data weregathered from the Standard and Poor's Compustat database. Results of this analysis show that cash flow impacts the investment behaviorof the Cooperatives, but it does not affect the investment behavior of theirpublicly traded counterparts.Given these results, managers ofAgricultural Cooperatives might be wise to consider growth-related strategies,while at the same time maintaining a conservative capital structure.(SRD)
Constantine Iliopoulos - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Agricultural Cooperatives in netchains
Journal on Chain and Network Science, 2016Co-Authors: Constantine Iliopoulos, Michael L Cook, Fabio R. ChaddadAbstract:This special issue of the Journal on Chain and Network Science on ‘Agricultural Cooperatives in netchains’ includes new research on three research themes: (1) explanation of why are Cooperatives particularly important in certain food netchains; (2) willingness of farmers to invest in their cooperative’s netchain; and (3) the role of ambidexterity in the emergence of multi-stakeholder Cooperatives. The issue is organized into six papers; one editorial and five research papers. The findings reported in this issue inform scholarly work on Agricultural Cooperatives through multiple theoretical lenses and empirical approaches. They also have important managerial and public policy implications.
-
public policy support for Agricultural Cooperatives an organizational economics approach
Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 2013Co-Authors: Constantine IliopoulosAbstract:This paper addresses the issue of whether nontraditional Agricultural Cooperatives should be eligible for receiving public policy support. We adopt an organizational economics approach that appears to better inform policy design and suggest critical questions that both policy makers and regulators need to address before introducing measures and sanctions. After discussing the introduction of innovative cooperative models characterized by a whole new set of ownership and control rights, we recast vaguely defined property rights problems as attempts to maximize efficiency and avoid organizational decline rather than to take advantage of excessive market power in highly concentrated oligopsonistic/oligopolistic markets. El articulo centra la atencion en la cuestion relativa al derecho de las cooperativas agricolas no tradicionales a una politica publica de apoyo. El autor adopta el enfoque de la economia de las organizaciones adaptado para aprehender la elaboracion de una politica determinada, proponiendo cuestiones criticas que los responsables politicos y los reguladores deben plantearse antes de introducir medidas y sanciones. Tras haber examinado en la introduccion los modelos cooperativos innovadores, caracterizados por un completo conjunto de derechos de propiedad y de control, el autor reformula algunas cuestiones de los derechos de propiedad vagamente definidos, con el objetivo de maximizar la eficiencia y evitar el declive de la organizacion antes que obtener ventajas de un poder excesivo en mercados oligopsonisticos/oligopolisticos altamente concentrados. L'article porte sur la question du droit des Cooperatives agricoles non traditionnelles a une politique publique de soutien. L'auteur adopte une approche de l’economie des organisations mieux adaptee pour apprehender l’elaboration d'une politique et qui propose des questions critiques que les decideurs politiques et les regulateurs doivent se poser avant d'introduire des mesures et des sanctions. Apres avoir examine l'introduction de modeles cooperatifs innovants caracterises par un nouvel ensemble complet de droits de propriete et de controle, l'auteur remanie certains problemes de droits de propriete vaguement definis dans le but de maximiser l'efficacite et eviter le declin de l'organisation plutot que de tirer avantage d'un pouvoir excessif de marche dans des marches oligopsonistiques/oligopolistiques hautement concentres. Dieser Beitrag erortert die Frage, ob Agrargenossenschaften nicht‐traditioneller Art berechtigt sein sollten, staatliche Forderung zu erhalten. Gewahlt wird ein Organizational Economics‐Ansatz, der geeignet erscheint, bei der Politikgestaltung besser zu informieren und kritische Fragen aufzuwerfen, mit denen sich sowohl politische Entscheidungstrager als auch Regulatoren auseinandersetzen mussen, bevor sie uber die Einfuhrung von Maβnahmen und Sanktionen entscheiden. Im Anschluss an die Erorterung der Einfuhrung innovativer Genossenschaftsmodelle, die sich durch eine ganze neue Reihe von Eigentums‐ und Kontrollrechten auszeichnen, erfolgt eine Neubefassung mit vage definierten Property Rights‐Problemen als Ansatze zur Maximierung von Effizienz und zur Vermeidung organisatorischen Niedergangs anstelle der Nutzung exzessiver Marktmacht auf hoch konzentrierten oligopsonistischen/oligopolistischen Markten.
-
public policy support for Agricultural Cooperatives an organizational economics approach
Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 2013Co-Authors: Constantine IliopoulosAbstract:This paper addresses the issue of whether nontraditional Agricultural Cooperatives should be eligible for receiving public policy support. We adopt an organizational economics approach that appears to better inform policy design and suggest critical questions that both policy makers and regulators need to address before introducing measures and sanctions. After discussing the introduction of innovative cooperative models characterized by a whole new set of ownership and control rights, we recast vaguely defined property rights problems as attempts to maximize efficiency and avoid organizational decline rather than to take advantage of excessive market power in highly concentrated oligopsonistic/oligopolistic markets. Apoyo de las politicas publicas a las cooperativas agricolas: una aproximacion a la economia de las organizaciones El articulo centra la atencion en la cuestion relativa al derecho de las cooperativas agricolas no tradicionales a una politica publica de apoyo. El autor adopta el enfoque de la economia de las organizaciones adaptado para aprehender la elaboracion de una politica determinada, proponiendo cuestiones criticas que los responsables politicos y los reguladores deben plantearse antes de introducir medidas y sanciones. Tras haber examinado en la introduccion los modelos cooperativos innovadores, caracterizados por un completo conjunto de derechos de propiedad y de control, el autor reformula algunas cuestiones de los derechos de propiedad vagamente definidos, con el objetivo de maximizar la eficiencia y evitar el declive de la organizacion antes que obtener ventajas de un poder excesivo en mercados oligopsonisticos/oligopolisticos altamente concentrados. Support de politique publique pour les Cooperatives agricoles : une approche de l’economie des organisations L'article porte sur la question du droit des Cooperatives agricoles non traditionnelles a une politique publique de soutien. L'auteur adopte une approche de l’economie des organisations mieux adaptee pour apprehender l’elaboration d'une politique et qui propose des questions critiques que les decideurs politiques et les regulateurs doivent se poser avant d'introduire des mesures et des sanctions. Apres avoir examine l'introduction de modeles cooperatifs innovants caracterises par un nouvel ensemble complet de droits de propriete et de controle, l'auteur remanie certains problemes de droits de propriete vaguement definis dans le but de maximiser l'efficacite et eviter le declin de l'organisation plutot que de tirer avantage d'un pouvoir excessif de marche dans des marches oligopsonistiques/oligopolistiques hautement concentres. Staatliche Forderung von Agrargenossenschaften: Ein Organizational Economics-Ansatz Dieser Beitrag erortert die Frage, ob Agrargenossenschaften nicht-traditioneller Art berechtigt sein sollten, staatliche Forderung zu erhalten. Gewahlt wird ein Organizational Economics-Ansatz, der geeignet erscheint, bei der Politikgestaltung besser zu informieren und kritische Fragen aufzuwerfen, mit denen sich sowohl politische Entscheidungstrager als auch Regulatoren auseinandersetzen mussen, bevor sie uber die Einfuhrung von Maβnahmen und Sanktionen entscheiden. Im Anschluss an die Erorterung der Einfuhrung innovativer Genossenschaftsmodelle, die sich durch eine ganze neue Reihe von Eigentums- und Kontrollrechten auszeichnen, erfolgt eine Neubefassung mit vage definierten Property Rights-Problemen als Ansatze zur Maximierung von Effizienz und zur Vermeidung organisatorischen Niedergangs anstelle der Nutzung exzessiver Marktmacht auf hoch konzentrierten oligopsonistischen/oligopolistischen Markten.
-
Opportunism in Agricultural Cooperatives in Greece
2013Co-Authors: Constantine Iliopoulos, Vladislav ValentinovAbstract:This paper compares the new institutional economics literature on Agricultural Cooperatives to their actual operation in Greece. The key contrast thus revealed concerns the role of opportunism. New institutional economics explains Cooperatives in terms of their ability to combat external opportunism, subject to the constraints of internal opportunism. In contrast to this literature, in Greek Agricultural Cooperatives, internal opportunism is shown to inflate their formal organizational structures and to lower their effectiveness in serving members. The paper concludes by discussing theoretical, policy and practical implications of this argument.
-
control rights governance and the costs of ownership in Agricultural Cooperatives
Social Science Research Network, 2013Co-Authors: Fabio R. Chaddad, Constantine IliopoulosAbstract:Agricultural Cooperatives have changed considerably in recent decades. In witnessing these structural changes, scholars have proffered analyses of non-traditional ownership models focusing on residual claim rights. As a result, crucial information on the allocation of control rights in Cooperatives is missing. This paper makes a contribution to this literature and shed light on alternative ownership-control models adopted by Agricultural Cooperatives in different regions across the world. In each of these models we describe the allocation of formal control rights and, in particular, the allocation of decision management and decision control rights. In doing so, we provide empirical evidence on the "separation of ownership and control" in Agricultural Cooperatives. We also analyze each of the governance models in terms of the associated ownership costs, including risk bearing costs, the costs of controlling managers, and collective decision making costs. This analysis enable us to identify potential inefficiencies and understand the forces influencing the organizational efficiency and effectiveness of each cooperative model.
Terefe Degefa - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
social and environmental impacts of Agricultural Cooperatives evidence from ethiopia
International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 2015Co-Authors: Dagne Mojo, Christian Fischer, Terefe DegefaAbstract:Cooperatives are considered as potential organizational vehicles for sustainable development due to their multiple objectives and diverse roles. In particular, a lot is expected from Agricultural Cooperatives since they depend mainly on natural resource-based activities where sustainability issues are central concerns. Using household survey data of 305 coffee farmers from Ethiopia, the impacts of cooperative membership on farmers’ social and environmental performances are examined. Findings, based on propensity scores matching, show a significant positive impact of Cooperatives on members’ social capital including trust, commitment and satisfaction, and on human capital such as training sessions received and experiences gained. However, farmers’ environmental performance is negatively associated with membership contrary to expectations. The findings suggest further efforts that need to be made by Agricultural Cooperatives to improve the environmental performance of farmers, while the accumulated human an...
Vineet Tiwari - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
a study on the determinants of financial performance of u s Agricultural Cooperatives
Social Science Research Network, 2019Co-Authors: Kuldeep Singh, Madhvendra Misra, Mohit Kumar, Vineet TiwariAbstract:A significant number of studies have been made in the area of Agricultural economics; however, there is a paucity of work that investigates factors or determinants which influence the financial performance of agro Cooperatives. This paper investigates determinants of financial performance for the United States (U.S.) Agricultural Cooperatives for the period 2009-2017. By using the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) database, we created a sample of 37 U.S. agro Cooperatives. For analysis, we used panel regression analysis as it is suitable to deal with fixed effect or random effect error component presented in the model. Finding states that the U.S. agro Cooperatives are found highly sensitive to economic policy uncertainty. The results provide evidence of a negative relationship between size and profitability. Moreover, the impact of growth and capital intensity is also reflected in the return on asset (ROA). In this study, we considered ROA as a proxy for firm performance. Implications and suggestions for further new research are also discussed.
Thomas Heckelei - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
testing for the presence of financial constraints in us Agricultural Cooperatives an investment behaviour approach
Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2005Co-Authors: Fabio R. Chaddad, Michael L Cook, Thomas HeckeleiAbstract:This study examines the presence of financial constraints in US Agricultural Cooperatives. We test the cooperative capital constraint hypothesis with a panel data econometric analysis of Agricultural Cooperatives’ investment behaviour. Regression results suggest that Agricultural Cooperatives’ capital expenditures are significantly affected by the availability of internal funds. Results also indicate that the sensitivity of investment to cash flow is correlated with cooperative structural characteristics.
-
testing for the presence of financial constraints in us Agricultural Cooperatives an investment behaviour approach
Social Science Research Network, 2005Co-Authors: Fabio R. Chaddad, Michael L Cook, Thomas HeckeleiAbstract:Agriculture Cooperatives have become animportant means by which independent producers access the markets and achievecompetitive returns.This study explores the financial constraints ofthese Agricultural Cooperatives that result from an inability to obtain therisk capital necessary for investing in productive assets. From the 876 firmsincluded in this analysis, four types of Cooperatives are represented: localfarm supply and grain marketing Cooperatives, processing Cooperatives withoperations in food manufacturing industries, Agricultural production andservice Cooperatives, and Cooperatives involved in wholesale tradeactivity. Cash flow, liquidity, credit risk, and leverage are all shown to have asignificant impact on cooperative investment. The results also demonstrate thatthe larger a cooperative's size the less sensitive investment is to cashflow.Focusing specifically on the food manufacturing industry, data weregathered from the Standard and Poor's Compustat database. Results of this analysis show that cash flow impacts the investment behaviorof the Cooperatives, but it does not affect the investment behavior of theirpublicly traded counterparts.Given these results, managers ofAgricultural Cooperatives might be wise to consider growth-related strategies,while at the same time maintaining a conservative capital structure.(SRD)