The Experts below are selected from a list of 324 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Lorenzo Prendini - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
FIgS. 15–17. Urodacus butleri, n. sp., holotype ♂ (WAM T85141), dextral pedipalp patella, illustrating distribution of trichobothria (open circles). 15. Dorsal Aspect. 16. External Aspect. 17. Ventral Aspect. Scale bar = 0.5 mm.
2018Co-Authors: Erich S. Volschenk, Mark S. Harvey, Lorenzo PrendiniAbstract:FIgS. 15–17. Urodacus butleri, n. sp., holotype ♂ (WAM T85141), dextral pedipalp patella, illustrating distribution of trichobothria (open circles). 15. Dorsal Aspect. 16. External Aspect. 17. Ventral Aspect. Scale bar = 0.5 mm
-
FIgS. 20–22. Urodacus Peters, 1861, dextral pedipalp chela, Dorsal Aspect. 20. Urodacus butleri, n. sp., holotype ♂ (WAM T85141). 21. Urodacus planimanus Pocock, 1893, ♂ (WAM T41311). 22. Urodacus novaehollandiae Peters, 1861, ♂ (WAM T80254). Scale b
2018Co-Authors: Erich S. Volschenk, Mark S. Harvey, Lorenzo PrendiniAbstract:FIgS. 20–22. Urodacus Peters, 1861, dextral pedipalp chela, Dorsal Aspect. 20. Urodacus butleri, n. sp., holotype ♂ (WAM T85141). 21. Urodacus planimanus Pocock, 1893, ♂ (WAM T41311). 22. Urodacus novaehollandiae Peters, 1861, ♂ (WAM T80254). Scale bar = 1 mm
-
FIG. 16 in Systematic Revision of the Neotropical Club-Tailed Scorpions, Physoctonus, Rhopalurus, and Troglorhopalurus, Revalidation of Heteroctenus, and Descriptions of Two New Genera and Three New Species (Buthidae: Rhopalurusinae)
2017Co-Authors: Lauren A. Esposito, Humberto Y. Yamaguti, Cláudio A. Souza, Ricardo Pinto-da-rocha, Lorenzo PrendiniAbstract:FIG. 16. Rhopalurusinae Bücherl, 1971, carapace, Dorsal Aspect. A. Physoctonus debilis (C. L. Koch, 1840), ♀ (MZSP). B. Physoctonus striatus, sp. nov., paratype ♂ (MZSP). C. Rhopalurus caribensis Teruel and Roncallo, 2008, ♂ (AMNH). D. Rhopalurus laticauda Thorell, 1876, ♂ (AMNH), Laguna Canaima, Venezuela. E. Rhopalurus laticauda Thorell, 1876, ♂ (AMNH), Guatire, Venezuela. F. Rhopalurus ochoai, sp. nov., holotype ♂ (AMNH). Scale bars = 1 mm (A, B), 2 mm (C – F)
-
FIG. 11 in Systematic Revision of the Neotropical Club-Tailed Scorpions, Physoctonus, Rhopalurus, and Troglorhopalurus, Revalidation of Heteroctenus, and Descriptions of Two New Genera and Three New Species (Buthidae: Rhopalurusinae)
2017Co-Authors: Lauren A. Esposito, Humberto Y. Yamaguti, Cláudio A. Souza, Ricardo Pinto-da-rocha, Lorenzo PrendiniAbstract:FIG. 11. Rhopalurusinae Bücherl, 1971, dextral pecten, ventral Aspect (A, C, E, G) and pectinal teeth, Dorsal Aspect (B, D, F). A. Heteroctenus junceus (Herbst, 1800), ♂ (AMNH). B. Heteroctenus bonettii (Armas, 1999), comb. nov., ♀ (AMNH). C. Rhopalurus laticauda Thorell, 1876, ♂ (MZSP) D. Jaguajir rochae (Borelli, 1910), comb. nov., (AMNH). E. Rhopalurus laticauda Thorell, 1876, ♂ (AMCC [LP 2845]). F. Troglorhopalurus lacrau (Lourenço and Pinto-da-Rocha 1997), comb. nov., ♀ (AMCC [LP 3260]). G. Physoctonus debilis (C. L. Koch, 1840), ♀ (MZSP)
Peremiquel Pares Casanova - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
existence of mandibular directional asymmetry in the european wild boar sus scrofa linnaeus 1758
Journal of Morphological Sciences, 2014Co-Authors: Peremiquel Pares CasanovaAbstract:We studied a sample of 37 dentulous dry mandibles from European wild board (Sus scrofa) and compared both the right and left sides in their Dorsal Aspect. To study the influence of age, the samples were grouped according to dental status: "subadults" (erupting 3rd M, n=22) and "adults" (fully erupted 3rd M, n=15). Individual levels of asymmetry were analysed from x- and y-coordinates of the 16 landmarks on the Dorsal Aspect of the mandible. Results. The analysis separated directional asymmetry (one side of the body with a larger character value than the other) and fluctuating asymmetry (small random deviations from perfect symmetry), which were both found to be significant. Conclusion. The condylar ramus was the most asymmetric structure for both age groups.
-
existence of mandibular directional asymmetry in the european wild boar sus scrofa linnaeus 1758
Journal of Morphological Sciences, 2014Co-Authors: Peremiquel Pares CasanovaAbstract:We studied a sample of 37 dentulous dry mandibles from European wild board (Sus scrofa) and compared both the right and left sides in their Dorsal Aspect. To study the influence of age, the samples were grouped according to dental status: "subadults" (erupting 3rd M, n=22) and "adults" (fully erupted 3rd M, n=15). Individual levels of asymmetry were analysed from x- and y-coordinates of the 16 landmarks on the Dorsal Aspect of the mandible. Results. The analysis separated directional asymmetry (one side of the body with a larger character value than the other) and fluctuating asymmetry (small random deviations from perfect symmetry), which were both found to be significant. Conclusion. The condylar ramus was the most asymmetric structure for both age groups.
-
geometric morphometric on Dorsal Aspect of skull does not differences between horned and polled domestic goats
2013Co-Authors: Peremiquel Pares CasanovaAbstract:Few previous studies have explored caprine skulls using geometric morphometric (GM) methods, which enable the quantitative analysis and visualisation of shape changes in skeletal elements and provide an important compliment to traditional lineal analyses. The aim of this research is to determine whether GM techniques can provide insights into how the shape of the goat skull differs between horned and polled animals, focusing on the differences between the Dorsal Aspects of the neurocranium. Fourteen skulls (4 polled and 10 horned) skulls from adult goats belonging to different breeds were studied. From the obtained results, neither the size nor shape showed statistically significant differences between polled and horned skulls. As animal"s functional capabilities are influenced by the presence of horns (if horns must function as shock absorbers, protecting the brain from blows during intraspecific combat, it would seem that some differences in shape and/or size should be detected), it seems plausible to assume that landmarks located on the Dorsal Aspect of the neurocranium are not useful to detect those differences between horned and polled goats.
Liang Hongbin - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
FIGURES 54 – 55 in Contribution to the knowledge of the genus Harpalus in China, with description of new taxa (Coleoptera: Carabidae: Harpalini)
2018Co-Authors: Kataev, Boris M., Liang HongbinAbstract:FIGURES 54 – 55. Harpalus potanini (Sichuan, Xiaojin Valley, lectotype), median lobe of aedeagus. 54, lateral Aspect; 55, Dorsal Aspect. Scale = 1.0 mm
-
FIGURES 11 – 16 in Contribution to the knowledge of the genus Harpalus in China, with description of new taxa (Coleoptera: Carabidae: Harpalini)
2018Co-Authors: Kataev, Boris M., Liang HongbinAbstract:FIGURES 11 – 16. Harpalus viridanus, median lobe of aedeagus (13 – 14, terminal lamella). 11 – 13, H. v. angustibasis ssp. n. (Qinghai, Yushu Co., paratype); 14 – 16, H. v. staudingerianus (Minxian, paratype). 11, 13 – 16, Dorsal Aspect; 12, 16, lateral Aspect. Scales: A = 0.5 mm (Figs 13 – 14), B = 1.0 mm (Figs 11 – 12, 15 – 16)
-
FIGURES 1 – 6 in Contribution to the knowledge of the genus Harpalus in China, with description of new taxa (Coleoptera: Carabidae: Harpalini)
2018Co-Authors: Kataev, Boris M., Liang HongbinAbstract:FIGURES 1 – 6. Harpalus vernicosus sp. n. (Sichuan, Xiangcheng Co.: 1 – 3, paratype; 4 – 6, holotype). 1, labium; 2, hemisternite and stylus; 3, left metepisternum; 4, habitus; 5, median lobe of aedeagus, Dorsal Aspect; 6, same, lateral Aspect. Scales: A = 1.0 mm (Fig. 4), B = 0.5 mm (Figs 1 – 2, 5 – 6), C = 1.0 mm (Fig. 3)
-
FIGURES 17 – 24 in Contribution to the knowledge of the genus Harpalus in China, with description of new taxa (Coleoptera: Carabidae: Harpalini)
2018Co-Authors: Kataev, Boris M., Liang HongbinAbstract:FIGURES 17 – 24. Harpalus parasinuatus sp. n. (17 – 18, 20, 23 – 24, Sichuan, Garzê Co., paratype; 19, 21 – 22, Qinghai, Yushu Co., paratype). 17 – 18, pronotum; 19, hemisternite and stylus; 20, left metepisternum; 21, 23, median lobe of aedeagus, Dorsal Aspect, 22, 24, same, lateral Aspect. Scales: A = 1.0 mm (Figs 17 – 18), B = 0.5 mm (Figs 19, 21 – 24), C = 1.0 mm (Fig. 20)
-
FIGURES 45 – 53 in Contribution to the knowledge of the genus Harpalus in China, with description of new taxa (Coleoptera: Carabidae: Harpalini)
2018Co-Authors: Kataev, Boris M., Liang HongbinAbstract:FIGURES 45 – 53. Harpalus giacomazzoi, median lobe of aedeagus (47, 50, 53, terminal lamella). 45 – 50, H. g. giacomazzoi (45 – 47, Sichuan, Dêgê Co.; 48 – 50, Sichuan, Yargong); 51 – 53, H. g. gracilis ssp. n. (Tibet, Markam Co., holotype). 45, 47 – 48, 50 – 51, 53, Dorsal Aspect); 46, 49, 52, lateral Aspect). Scales: A = 0.5 mm (Figs 47, 50, 53), B = 1.0 mm (Figs 45 – 46, 48 – 49, 51 – 52)
L M Dickie - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
an analytical model of acoustic fish reflection for estimation of maximum Dorsal Aspect target strength
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 1991Co-Authors: M L Thiebaux, P R Boudreau, L M DickieAbstract:We develop a simple analytical model of the acoustic reflectivity offish targets based on empirical observations in field and laboratory settings. It enables unbiased estimation of maximum Dorsal Aspect target strength in cases where individual fish are observed a minimum of three times in successive pings of a survey transect. The model results are consistent with observations of example fish targets of two demersal species. It promises improved estimates of target strength from field measurements.
Kamali Karim - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
FIGURE 14 in Study of the genus Opius Wesmael (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Opiinae) in Southern Iran, with eleven new records
2014Co-Authors: Ameri Ali, Talebi, Ali Asghar, Rakhshani Ehsan, Beyarslan Ahmet, Kamali KarimAbstract:FIGURE 14. Opius ripheus; A. Lateral Aspect of head and compound eye, B. Frontal Aspect of head, C. Dorsal Aspect of head, D. Lateral Aspect of mesosoma, E. Dorsal Aspect of mesosoma, F. Propodeum, G. Hind leg, H. Fore wing, I. Dorsal Aspect of metasoma
-
FIGURE 10 in Study of the genus Opius Wesmael (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Opiinae) in Southern Iran, with eleven new records
2014Co-Authors: Ameri Ali, Talebi, Ali Asghar, Rakhshani Ehsan, Beyarslan Ahmet, Kamali KarimAbstract:FIGURE 10. Opius nowakowskii; A. Lateral Aspect of head and compound eye, B. Frontal Aspect of head, C. Dorsal Aspect of head, D. Lateral Aspect of mesosoma, E. Dorsal Aspect of mesosoma, F. Propodeum, G. Hind leg, H. Fore wing, I. Dorsal Aspect of metasoma
-
FIGURE 6 in Study of the genus Opius Wesmael (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Opiinae) in Southern Iran, with eleven new records
2014Co-Authors: Ameri Ali, Talebi, Ali Asghar, Rakhshani Ehsan, Beyarslan Ahmet, Kamali KarimAbstract:FIGURE 6. Opius flavipes; A. Lateral Aspect of head and compound eye, B. Frontal Aspect of head, C. Dorsal Aspect of head, D. Lateral Aspect of mesosoma, E. Dorsal Aspect of mesosoma, F. Propodeum, G. Hind leg, H. Fore wing, I. Dorsal Aspect of metasoma
-
FIGURE 16 in Study of the genus Opius Wesmael (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Opiinae) in Southern Iran, with eleven new records
2014Co-Authors: Ameri Ali, Talebi, Ali Asghar, Rakhshani Ehsan, Beyarslan Ahmet, Kamali KarimAbstract:FIGURE 16. Opius tabificus; A. Lateral Aspect of head and compound eye, B. Frontal Aspect of head, C. Dorsal Aspect of head, D. Lateral Aspect of mesosoma, E. Dorsal Aspect of mesosoma, F. Propodeum, G. Hind leg, H. Fore wing, I. Dorsal Aspect of metasoma
-
FIGURE 4 in Study of the genus Opius Wesmael (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Opiinae) in Southern Iran, with eleven new records
2014Co-Authors: Ameri Ali, Talebi, Ali Asghar, Rakhshani Ehsan, Beyarslan Ahmet, Kamali KarimAbstract:FIGURE 4. Opius caucasi; A. Lateral Aspect of head and compound eye, B. Frontal Aspect of head, C. Dorsal Aspect of head, D. Lateral Aspect of mesosoma, E. Dorsal Aspect of mesosoma, F. Propodeum, G. Hind leg, H. Fore wing, I. Dorsal Aspect of metasoma
