The Experts below are selected from a list of 56397 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Brian R. Baucom - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
A replication and extension of the Interpersonal Process model of demand/withdraw behavior: Incorporating subjective emotional experience.
Journal of Family Psychology, 2020Co-Authors: Karena Leo, Alexander O. Crenshaw, Jasara N. Hogan, Stacia Bourne, Katherine J. W. Baucom, Brian R. BaucomAbstract:The demand/withdraw (D/W) interaction pattern is a maladaptive cycle of behavior that is associated with a wide range of deleterious individual and relational outcomes. Partners' emotional responding during couple conflict has long been theorized to play a central role in the occurrence of D/W. The Interpersonal Process model of D/W behavior suggests that each partner's emotional responses are associated with their own as well as the other partner's behavior in the D/W cycle and that the nature of these associations varies across partners. A prior test of the Interpersonal Process model provided support for sex- and role-specific associations between vocal emotional expression and demanding and withdrawing behaviors. The current study expands the conceptual frame of the Interpersonal Process model by incorporating subjective emotional experience. Hypothesized associations between subjective emotional experience, emotional expression, and role-specific demanding and withdrawing behaviors were tested in a sample of 59 couples using an actor-partner interdependence model. Results reveal that spouses experience and express nonsignificantly different levels of negative affect but strongly differ in how the experience and expression of those emotions are related to demanding and withdrawing behaviors. High levels of women's demanding behavior were associated with the combination of experiencing and expressing high levels of negative affect, while high levels of men's withdrawing behavior were associated with experiencing high levels of negative affect but expressing low levels of negative affect. Implications of results for understanding emotional Processes in maladaptive cycles and for clinical practice are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
-
a replication and extension of the Interpersonal Process model of demand withdraw behavior incorporating subjective emotional experience
Journal of Family Psychology, 2020Co-Authors: Karena Leo, Alexander O. Crenshaw, Jasara N. Hogan, Stacia Bourne, Katherine J. W. Baucom, Brian R. BaucomAbstract:The demand/withdraw (D/W) interaction pattern is a maladaptive cycle of behavior that is associated with a wide range of deleterious individual and relational outcomes. Partners' emotional responding during couple conflict has long been theorized to play a central role in the occurrence of D/W. The Interpersonal Process model of D/W behavior suggests that each partner's emotional responses are associated with their own as well as the other partner's behavior in the D/W cycle and that the nature of these associations varies across partners. A prior test of the Interpersonal Process model provided support for sex- and role-specific associations between vocal emotional expression and demanding and withdrawing behaviors. The current study expands the conceptual frame of the Interpersonal Process model by incorporating subjective emotional experience. Hypothesized associations between subjective emotional experience, emotional expression, and role-specific demanding and withdrawing behaviors were tested in a sample of 59 couples using an actor-partner interdependence model. Results reveal that spouses experience and express nonsignificantly different levels of negative affect but strongly differ in how the experience and expression of those emotions are related to demanding and withdrawing behaviors. High levels of women's demanding behavior were associated with the combination of experiencing and expressing high levels of negative affect, while high levels of men's withdrawing behavior were associated with experiencing high levels of negative affect but expressing low levels of negative affect. Implications of results for understanding emotional Processes in maladaptive cycles and for clinical practice are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
-
the Interpersonal Process model of demand withdraw behavior
Journal of Family Psychology, 2015Co-Authors: Brian R. Baucom, Janna A. Dickenson, David C. Atkins, Donald H. Baucom, Melanie S. Fischer, Sarah Weusthoff, Kurt Hahlweg, Tanja ZimmermannAbstract:The demand/withdraw interaction pattern is a destructive cycle of relationship communication behavior that is associated with negative individual and relationship outcomes. Demand/withdraw behavior is thought to be strongly linked to partners' emotional reactions, but current theories are inconsistent with empirical findings. The current study proposes the Interpersonal Process model of demand/withdraw behavior, which includes linkages between each partners' emotional reactions and the Interpersonal behavior of demanding and withdrawing. Data come from problem solving discussions of 55 German couples with observationally coded demand/withdraw behavior and fundamental frequency (f₀) to measure vocally encoded emotional arousal. Actor-partner interdependence models (Kenny, Kashy, & Cook, 2006) were used to examine associations among demand/withdraw behavior and f₀ in the overall discussion and 5-min segments. Significant cross-partner associations emerged for demanding and withdrawing behavior across the whole conversation as well as within 5-min segments, and these associations are partially accounted for by each individual's f₀. When behaviorally coded demanders expressed more vocal arousal, they demanded more and withdrew less while their partners withdrew more. In contrast, when behaviorally coded withdrawers expressed more vocal arousal, their partners demanded less and withdrew more. Findings demonstrate that demand/withdraw behavior varies between couples (i.e., some couples engage in a stronger demand/withdraw cycle than others) and between segments (i.e., when 1 partner increases demanding, the other increases withdrawing). Findings support key elements of the Interpersonal Process model, showing intra- and Interpersonal pathways linking demand/withdraw behavior and emotion and demonstrate the importance of partners' behavioral roles in these linkages.
-
The Interpersonal Process model of demand/withdraw behavior.
Journal of Family Psychology, 2015Co-Authors: Brian R. Baucom, Janna A. Dickenson, David C. Atkins, Donald H. Baucom, Melanie S. Fischer, Sarah Weusthoff, Kurt Hahlweg, Tanja ZimmermannAbstract:The demand/withdraw interaction pattern is a destructive cycle of relationship communication behavior that is associated with negative individual and relationship outcomes. Demand/withdraw behavior is thought to be strongly linked to partners' emotional reactions, but current theories are inconsistent with empirical findings. The current study proposes the Interpersonal Process model of demand/withdraw behavior, which includes linkages between each partners' emotional reactions and the Interpersonal behavior of demanding and withdrawing. Data come from problem solving discussions of 55 German couples with observationally coded demand/withdraw behavior and fundamental frequency (f₀) to measure vocally encoded emotional arousal. Actor-partner interdependence models (Kenny, Kashy, & Cook, 2006) were used to examine associations among demand/withdraw behavior and f₀ in the overall discussion and 5-min segments. Significant cross-partner associations emerged for demanding and withdrawing behavior across the whole conversation as well as within 5-min segments, and these associations are partially accounted for by each individual's f₀. When behaviorally coded demanders expressed more vocal arousal, they demanded more and withdrew less while their partners withdrew more. In contrast, when behaviorally coded withdrawers expressed more vocal arousal, their partners demanded less and withdrew more. Findings demonstrate that demand/withdraw behavior varies between couples (i.e., some couples engage in a stronger demand/withdraw cycle than others) and between segments (i.e., when 1 partner increases demanding, the other increases withdrawing). Findings support key elements of the Interpersonal Process model, showing intra- and Interpersonal pathways linking demand/withdraw behavior and emotion and demonstrate the importance of partners' behavioral roles in these linkages.
John D Coie - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
girl talk gossip friendship and sociometric status
Merrill-palmer Quarterly, 2007Co-Authors: Kristina L Mcdonald, Martha Putallaz, Chrinstina L Grimes, Janis B Kupersmidt, John D CoieAbstract:This study examined the characteristics of gossip among fourth-grade girls and their close friends. Sixty friendship dyads were videotaped as they engaged in conversation, and their gossip was coded. Analyses revealed gossip to be a dominant feature of their interaction and that it was primarily neutral in valence. Sociometrically popular girls and their friends were observed to gossip more about peers, and their gossip was more evaluative than that between rejected girls and their friends. Gossip frequency and valence related to observed friendship closeness and friendship quality. Race differences in the characteristics of gossip were also explored. The study results are important in our efforts to develop a fuller understanding of the important Interpersonal Process of gossip and the functions that it serves in the context of close friendships.
-
gossip friendship and sociometric status
2007Co-Authors: Kristina L Mcdonald, Martha Putallaz, Janis B Kupersmidt, Christina Grimes L Duke, John D CoieAbstract:This study examined the characteristics of gossip among fourth-grade girls and their close friends. Sixty friendship dyads were videotaped as they engaged in conversation, and their gossip was coded. Analyses revealed gossip to be a dominant feature of their interaction and that it was primarily neutral in valence. Sociometrically popular girls and their friends were observed to gossip more about peers, and their gossip was more evaluative than that between rejected girls and their friends. Gossip frequency and valence related to observed friendship closeness and friendship quality. Race differences in the characteristics of gossip were also explored. The study results are important in our efforts to develop a fuller understanding of the important Interpersonal Process of gossip and the functions that it serves in the context of close friendships.
Junqi Shi - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Interpersonal Process of emotional labor the role of negative and positive customer treatment
Personnel Psychology, 2016Co-Authors: Yujie Zhan, Mo Wang, Junqi ShiAbstract:Emotional labor refers to the Process of regulating both feelings and expressions in response to the display rules for promoting organizational goals. Existing literature has provided strong evidence for the impact of emotional labor (i.e., surface acting and deep acting) on service employees’ emotional exhaustion. However, the empirical examination of the mechanisms underlying this association is largely missing from prior research. Drawing on the social interaction model of emotion regulation, this article reported 2 daily diary studies examining the role of customer treatment toward employees in channeling emotional labor's impact on employee emotional well-being. Specifically, Study 1 measured emotional labor at the between-person level as habitual emotional regulation strategies used by service employees, and Study 2 measured emotional labor at the within-person level to capture its fluctuations. Results showed that employees engaging in more surface acting were more likely to receive negative treatment from customers, which in turn increased their negative affect and emotional exhaustion. Further, employees engaging in more deep acting were more likely to receive positive treatment from customers, which in turn increased their positive affect. Implications and limitations of these findings were discussed.
Edward Teyber. - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Interpersonal Process In Therapy
2014Co-Authors: Edward Teyber.Abstract:Interpersonal Process In Therapy , Interpersonal Process In Therapy , کتابخانه دیجیتال جندی شاپور اهواز
-
Interpersonal Process in therapy an integrative model
2005Co-Authors: Edward Teyber.Abstract:PART ONE: AN Interpersonal Process APPROACH. 1. Introduction and Overview. PART TWO: RESPONDING TO CLIENTS. 2. Establishing a Working Alliance. 3. Honoring the Client's Resistance. 4. An Internal Focus for Change. 5. Responding to Painful Feelings. PART THREE: CONCEPTUALIZING CLIENT DYNAMICS AND FINDING A TREATMENT FOCUS. 6. Familial and Developmental Factors. 7. Inflexible Interpersonal Coping Strategies. 8. Interpersonal Patterns and Themes. PART FOUR: RESOLUTION AND CHANGE. 9. An Interpersonal Solution. 10. Resolution and Change. APPENDICES: A. Process Notes. B. Case Formulation Guidelines. BIBLIOGRAPHY. NAME INDEX. SUBJECT INDEX.
-
Interpersonal Process in psychotherapy a relational approach
1996Co-Authors: Edward Teyber.Abstract:Part 1 An Interpersonal Process approach: introduction and overview the need for a conceptual framework the Interpersonal Process approach theoretical and historical context basic premises client diversity and response specificity model of therapy limitations and aims suggestions for further reading. Part 2 Responding to clients: establishing a working alliance conceptual overview chapter organization a collaborative relationship balancing directive and nondirective initiatives beginning the initial interview understanding the client clients do not feel understood or affirmed demonstrating understanding identifying recurrent themes facilitating the collaborative alliance by means of Process comments performance anxieties care and understanding as preconditions of change closing suggestions for further reading. Part 3 Honouring the client's resistance conceptual overview chapter organization reluctance to address resistance the therapist's reluctance the client's reluctance identifying and conceptualizing resistance identifying resistance formulating working hypotheses responding to resistance resistance during the initial telephone contact resistance at the end of the first session resistance during subsequent sessions closing suggestions for further reading. Part 4 An internal focus for change: conceptual overview. chapter organization shifting to an Internal focus clients externalizing their problems focusing clients inward reluctance to adopt an internal focus placing the focus of change with clients using the therapeutic relationship to foster clients' initiative therapeutic interventions that place clients at the fulcrum of change enlisting clients in resolving their own conflicts recapitulating clients' conflicts providing a corrective emotional experience tracking clients' anxiety. identifying signs of clients' anxiety approaching clients' anxiety directly observing what precipitates clients' anxiety focusing clients inward to explore their anxiety closing suggestions for further reading. Part 5 Responding to conflicted emotions: conceptual overview chapter organization responding to clients' conflicted emotions approaching clients' affect expanding and elaborating clients' affect identifying and punctuating the predominant affect an old wound multiple stressors a characterological affect clients' affective constellations anger-sadness-shame sadness-anger-guilt. (Part contents).
-
Interpersonal Process in Psychotherapy: A Guide for Clinical Training
1991Co-Authors: Edward Teyber.Abstract:Part One: An Interpersonal Process approach. Introduction and overview. Part Two: Responding to clients. Establishing a collaborative relationship. Honoring the client's resistance. An internal focus for change. Responding to conflicted emotions. Part Three: Conceptualizing client dynamics. Familial and developmental factors. A model for conceptualizing client dynamics. Current Interpersonal factors. Part Four: Resolution and change. An Interpersonal solution. Working through and termination.
Sophie Bergeron - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Intimacy Mediates the Relation Between Maltreatment in Childhood and Sexual and Relationship Satisfaction in Adulthood: A Dyadic Longitudinal Analysis
Archives of Sexual Behavior, 2019Co-Authors: Marie-pier Vaillancourt-morel, Alessandra H. Rellini, Natacha Godbout, Stéphane Sabourin, Sophie BergeronAbstract:Trauma theories suggest that childhood maltreatment (CM) may partly explain intimacy problems in romantic relationships. However, empirical studies have yielded conflicting findings, likely due to the varying conceptualizations of intimacy. Findings that support long-term negative effects of CM on sexual and relationship satisfaction are almost exclusively based on cross-sectional intra-individual data, precluding the examination of mediating pathways and of dyadic interactions between individuals reporting CM and their partners. This study used a dyadic perspective to examine the associations between CM and the different components of intimacy based on the Interpersonal Process model of intimacy: self-disclosure, perceived partner disclosure, and perceived partner responsiveness. We also tested the mediating role of these intimacy components at Time 1 in the relations between CM and sexual and relationship satisfaction 6 months later. A sample of 365 heterosexual couples completed self-report questionnaires. Results of path analyses within an actor–partner interdependence framework showed that women and men’s higher levels of CM did not affect self-disclosure, but was negatively associated with their own perception of partner disclosure and responsiveness. In turn, women and men’s perception of partner responsiveness at Time 1 was positively associated with their own sexual satisfaction, as well as their own and their partner’s relationship satisfaction at Time 2. Thus, perception of partner responsiveness mediated the associations between CM and poorer sexual and relationship satisfaction. The overall findings may inform the development of couple intervention that targets the enhancement of intimacy to promote sexual and relationship well-being in couples where one partner experienced CM.
