The Experts below are selected from a list of 264 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Marc E H Jones - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Comparative cranial biomechanics in two lizard species: impact of variation in cranial design
'The Company of Biologists', 2021Co-Authors: Dutel Hugo, Marc E H Jones, Evans, Susan E., Gröning Flora, Sharp, Alana C, Watson, Peter J, Herrel Anthony, Ross, Callum F, Fagan, Michael JAbstract:Cranial morphology in Lepidosaurs is highly disparate and characterized by the frequent loss or reduction of bony elements. In varanids and geckos, the loss of the postorbital bar is associated with changes in skull shape, but the mechanical principles underlying this variation remain poorly understood. Here, we seek to determine how the overall cranial architecture and the presence of the postorbital bar relate to the loading and deformation of the cranial bones during biting in Lepidosaurs. Using computer-based simulation techniques, we compare cranial biomechanics in the varanid Varanus niloticus and the teiid Salvator merianae, two large, active foragers. The overall strain magnitudes and distribution across the cranium is similar in both species, despite lower strain gradients in Varanus niloticus. In Salvator merianae, the postorbital bar is important for the resistance of the cranium to feeding loads. The postorbital ligament, which partially replaces the postorbital bar in varanids, does not affect bone strain. Our results suggest that the reduction of the postorbital bar impaired neither biting performance nor the structural resistance of the cranium to feeding loads in Varanus niloticus. Differences in bone strain between the two species might reflect demands imposed by feeding and non-feeding functions on cranial shape. Beyond variation in cranial bone strain related to species-specific morphological differences, our results reveal that similar mechanical behaviour is shared by lizards with distinct cranial shapes. Contrary to mammals, the morphology of the circumorbital region, calvaria and palate appears to be important for withstanding high feeding loads in these lizards.
-
neutron scanning reveals unexpected complexity in the enamel thickness of an herbivorous jurassic reptile
Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 2018Co-Authors: Marc E H Jones, Peter W. Lucas, Abigail S. Tucker, Amy P. Watson, Joseph J. W. Sertich, John R. Foster, Ruth Williams, Ulf GarbeAbstract:Eilenodontines are one of the oldest radiation of herbivorous Lepidosaurs (snakes, lizards and tuatara) characterized by batteries of wide teeth with thick enamel that bear mammal-like wear facets....
-
SI Segmentation Protocol from Neutron scanning reveals unexpected complexity in the enamel thickness of an herbivorous Jurassic reptile
2018Co-Authors: Marc E H Jones, Peter W. Lucas, Abigail S. Tucker, Amy P. Watson, Joseph J. W. Sertich, John R. Foster, Ruth Williams, Ulf Garbe, Joseph J. Bevitt, Floriana SalveminiAbstract:Eilenodontines are one of the oldest radiation of herbivorous Lepidosaurs (snakes, lizards and tuatara) characterized by batteries of wide teeth with thick enamel that bear mammal-like wear facets. Unlike most reptiles, eilenodontines have limited tooth replacement, making dental longevity particularly important to them. We use both X-ray and neutron computed tomography to examine a fossil tooth from the eilenodontine Eilenodon (Late Jurassic, USA). Of the two approaches, neutron tomography was more successful and facilitated measurements of enamel thickness and distribution. We find the enamel thickness to be regionally variable, thin near the cusp tip (0.10 mm) but thicker around the base (0.15–0.30 mm) and notably greater than that of other rhynchocephalians such as the extant Sphenodon (0.08–0.14 mm). The thick enamel in Eilenodon would permit greater loading, extend tooth lifespan and facilitate the establishment of wear facets that have sharp edges for orally processing plant material such as horsetails (Equisetum). The shape of the enamel dentine junction indicates that tooth development in Eilenodon and Sphenodon involved similar folding of the epithelium but different ameloblast activity
-
SI Table 2 from Neutron scanning reveals unexpected complexity in the enamel thickness of an herbivorous Jurassic reptile
2018Co-Authors: Marc E H Jones, Peter W. Lucas, Abigail S. Tucker, Amy P. Watson, Joseph J. W. Sertich, John R. Foster, Ruth Williams, Ulf Garbe, Joseph J. Bevitt, Floriana SalveminiAbstract:Eilenodontines are one of the oldest radiation of herbivorous Lepidosaurs (snakes, lizards and tuatara) characterized by batteries of wide teeth with thick enamel that bear mammal-like wear facets. Unlike most reptiles, eilenodontines have limited tooth replacement, making dental longevity particularly important to them. We use both X-ray and neutron computed tomography to examine a fossil tooth from the eilenodontine Eilenodon (Late Jurassic, USA). Of the two approaches, neutron tomography was more successful and facilitated measurements of enamel thickness and distribution. We find the enamel thickness to be regionally variable, thin near the cusp tip (0.10 mm) but thicker around the base (0.15–0.30 mm) and notably greater than that of other rhynchocephalians such as the extant Sphenodon (0.08–0.14 mm). The thick enamel in Eilenodon would permit greater loading, extend tooth lifespan and facilitate the establishment of wear facets that have sharp edges for orally processing plant material such as horsetails (Equisetum). The shape of the enamel dentine junction indicates that tooth development in Eilenodon and Sphenodon involved similar folding of the epithelium but different ameloblast activity
-
3D animation tooth_3 from Neutron scanning reveals unexpected complexity in the enamel thickness of an herbivorous Jurassic reptile
2018Co-Authors: Marc E H Jones, Peter W. Lucas, Abigail S. Tucker, Amy P. Watson, Joseph J. W. Sertich, John R. Foster, Ruth Williams, Ulf Garbe, Joseph J. Bevitt, Floriana SalveminiAbstract:Eilenodontines are one of the oldest radiation of herbivorous Lepidosaurs (snakes, lizards and tuatara) characterized by batteries of wide teeth with thick enamel that bear mammal-like wear facets. Unlike most reptiles, eilenodontines have limited tooth replacement making dental longevity particularly important to them. We use both X-ray and neutron computed tomography to examine a fossil tooth from the eilenodontine Eilenodon (Late Jurassic, USA). Of the two approaches, neutron tomography was more successful and facilitated measurements of enamel thickness and distribution. We find the enamel thickness to be regionally variable, thin near the cusp tip (0.10 mm) but thicker around the base (0.15–0.30 mm) and notably greater than that of other rhynchocephalians such as the extant Sphenodon (0.08–0.14 mm). The thick enamel in Eilenodon would permit greater loading, extend tooth lifespan and facilitate the establishment of wear facets that have sharp edges for orally processing plant material such as horsetails (Equisetum). The shape of the enamel dentine junction indicates that tooth development in Eilenodon and Sphenodon involved similar folding of the epithelium but different ameloblast activity
David A. D. Parry - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
structure and topology of the linkers in the conserved Lepidosaur β keratin chain with four 34 residue repeats support an interfilament role for the central linker
Journal of Structural Biology, 2020Co-Authors: David A. D. ParryAbstract:Abstract The β-keratin chain with four 34-residue repeats that is conserved across the Lepidosaurs (lizards, snakes and tuatara) contains three linker regions as well as a short, conserved N-terminal domain and a longer, more variable C-terminal domain. Earlier modelling had shown that only six classes of structure involving the four 34-residue repeats were possible. In three of these the 34-residue repeats were confined to a single filament (Classes 1, 2 and 3) whereas in the remaining three classes the repeats lay in two, three or four filaments, with some of the linkers forming interfilament connections (Classes 4, 5 and 6). In this work the members of each class of structure (a total of 20 arrangements) have been described and a comparison has been made of the topologies of each of the linker regions. This provides new constraints on the structure of the chain as a whole. Also, analysis of the sequences of the three linker regions has revealed that the central linker (and only the central linker) contains four short regions displaying a distinctive dipeptide repeat of the form (S-X)2,3 separated by short regions containing proline and cysteine residues. By analogy with silk fibroin proteins this has the capability of forming a β-sheet-like conformation. Using the topology and sequence data the evidence suggests that the four 34-residue repeat chain adopts a Class 4a structure with a β-sandwich in filament 1 connected through the central linker to a β-sandwich in filament 2.
-
Lepidosaur s keratin chains with four 34 residue repeats modelling reveals a potential filament crosslinking role
Journal of Structural Biology, 2020Co-Authors: R Bruce D Fraser, David A. D. ParryAbstract:s-keratin chains contain a characteristic and homologous 34-residue sequence, which is believed to adopt a twisted s-sheet conformation that assembles in an antiparallel manner with a similar sheet in a second chain to form a s-sandwich. These sandwiches are, in turn, related to one another by a left-handed four-fold screw axis to generate a helical structure that forms the core of the 3.4 nm diameter filaments observed by electron microscopy and deduced from X-ray fibre diffraction. Recently, it has been shown that one s-keratin chain, with a molecular weight approximately twice that of the majority of s-keratin chains, is conserved across the Lepidosaurs (lizards, snakes and tuatara). Uniquely, it contains four 34-residue repeats. Although this chain is a minor component the observation that the entire chain shows a high degree of sequence conservation between species suggests an important structural/functional role in vivo. Modelling shows that only six families of structures are physically possible. In three of these the repeats exist within a single filament and might therefore act in a filament nucleation role. In the second three families the repeats exist in two, three or four filaments, implying that their function may be to act as an inter-filament crosslinker, thereby providing lateral reinforcement to the epidermal appendage. The favoured model is one in which the first two repeats form a β-sandwich in one filament and the second two repeats form a β-sandwich in a neighbouring filament. Links between alternating up- and down-pointing β-sheets would provide optimum connectivity.
-
Molecular structure of sauropsid β-keratins from tuatara (Sphenodon punctatus).
Journal of Structural Biology, 2019Co-Authors: David A. D. Parry, R.d. Bruce Fraser, Kim Rutherford, Lorenzo Alibardi, Neil John GemmellAbstract:Abstract The birds and reptiles, collectively known as the sauropsids, can be subdivided phylogenetically into the archosaurs (birds, crocodiles), the testudines (turtles), the squamates (lizards, snakes) and the rhynchocephalia (tuatara). The structural framework of the epidermal appendages from the sauropsids, which include feathers, claws and scales, has previously been characterised by electron microscopy, infrared spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction analyses, as well as by studies of the amino acid sequences of the constituent β-keratin proteins (also referred to as the corneous β-proteins). An important omission in this work, however, was the lack of sequence and structural data relating to the epidermal appendages of the rhynchocephalia (tuatara), one of the two branches of the Lepidosaurs. Considerable effort has gone into sequencing the tuatara genome and while this is not yet complete, there are now sufficient sequence data for conclusions to be drawn on the similarity of the β-keratins from the tuatara to those of other members of the sauropsids. These results, together with a comparison of the X-ray diffraction pattern of tuatara claw with those from seagull feather and goanna claw, confirm that there is a common structural plan in the β-keratins of all of the sauropsids, and not just those that comprise the archosaurs (birds and crocodiles), the testudines (turtles) and the squamates (lizards and snakes).
Neil John Gemmell - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Molecular structure of sauropsid β-keratins from tuatara (Sphenodon punctatus).
Journal of Structural Biology, 2019Co-Authors: David A. D. Parry, R.d. Bruce Fraser, Kim Rutherford, Lorenzo Alibardi, Neil John GemmellAbstract:Abstract The birds and reptiles, collectively known as the sauropsids, can be subdivided phylogenetically into the archosaurs (birds, crocodiles), the testudines (turtles), the squamates (lizards, snakes) and the rhynchocephalia (tuatara). The structural framework of the epidermal appendages from the sauropsids, which include feathers, claws and scales, has previously been characterised by electron microscopy, infrared spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction analyses, as well as by studies of the amino acid sequences of the constituent β-keratin proteins (also referred to as the corneous β-proteins). An important omission in this work, however, was the lack of sequence and structural data relating to the epidermal appendages of the rhynchocephalia (tuatara), one of the two branches of the Lepidosaurs. Considerable effort has gone into sequencing the tuatara genome and while this is not yet complete, there are now sufficient sequence data for conclusions to be drawn on the similarity of the β-keratins from the tuatara to those of other members of the sauropsids. These results, together with a comparison of the X-ray diffraction pattern of tuatara claw with those from seagull feather and goanna claw, confirm that there is a common structural plan in the β-keratins of all of the sauropsids, and not just those that comprise the archosaurs (birds and crocodiles), the testudines (turtles) and the squamates (lizards and snakes).
Julia A Clarke - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
a giant soft shelled egg from the late cretaceous of antarctica
Nature, 2020Co-Authors: Lucas J Legendre, David Rubilarrogers, Grace M Musser, Sarah N Davis, Rodrigo A Otero, Alexander O Vargas, Julia A ClarkeAbstract:Egg size and structure reflect important constraints on the reproductive and life-history characteristics of vertebrates1. More than two-thirds of all extant amniotes lay eggs2. During the Mesozoic era (around 250 million to 65 million years ago), body sizes reached extremes; nevertheless, the largest known egg belongs to the only recently extinct elephant bird3, which was roughly 66 million years younger than the last nonavian dinosaurs and giant marine reptiles. Here we report a new type of egg discovered in nearshore marine deposits from the Late Cretaceous period (roughly 68 million years ago) of Antarctica. It exceeds all nonavian dinosaur eggs in volume and differs from them in structure. Although the elephant bird egg is slightly larger, its eggshell is roughly five times thicker and shows a substantial prismatic layer and complex pore structure4. By contrast, the new fossil, visibly collapsed and folded, presents a thin eggshell with a layered structure that lacks a prismatic layer and distinct pores, and is similar to that of most extant lizards and snakes (Lepidosauria)5. The identity of the animal that laid the egg is unknown, but these preserved morphologies are consistent with the skeletal remains of mosasaurs (large marine Lepidosaurs) found nearby. They are not consistent with described morphologies of dinosaur eggs of a similar size class. Phylogenetic analyses of traits for 259 Lepidosaur species plus outgroups suggest that the egg belonged to an individual that was at least 7 metres long, hypothesized to be a giant marine reptile, all clades of which have previously been proposed to show live birth6. Such a large egg with a relatively thin eggshell may reflect derived constraints associated with body shape, reproductive investment linked with gigantism, and Lepidosaurian viviparity, in which a ‘vestigial’ egg is laid and hatches immediately7. A fossil egg unearthed from Cretaceous deposits in Antarctica is more than 20 cm long, exceeds all known nonavian eggs in volume, is soft-shelled, and was perhaps laid by a giant marine lizard such as a mosasaur.
Kevin J Peterson - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
toward consilience in reptile phylogeny mirnas support an archosaur not Lepidosaur affinity for turtles
Evolution & Development, 2014Co-Authors: Tyler R. Lyson, Jacques A Gauthier, Benjamin L King, Daniel J Field, Davide Pisani, Kevin J PetersonAbstract:SUMMARY Understanding the phylogenetic position of crown turtles (Testudines) among amniotes has been a source of particular contention. Recent morphological analyses suggest that turtles are sister to all other reptiles, whereas the vast majority of gene sequence analyses support turtles as being inside Diapsida, and usually as sister to crown Archosauria (birds and crocodilians). Previously, a study using microRNAs (miRNAs) placed turtles inside diapsids, but as sister to Lepidosaurs (lizards and Sphenodon) rather than archosaurs. Here, we test this hypothesis with an expanded miRNA presence/absence dataset, and employ more rigorous criteria for miRNA annotation. Significantly, we find no support for a turtle + Lepidosaur sister-relationship; instead, we recover strong support for turtles sharing a more recent common ancestor with archosaurs. We further test this result by analyzing a super-alignment of precursor miRNA sequences for every miRNA inferred to have been present in the most recent common ancestor of tetrapods. This analysis yields a topology that is fully congruent with our presence/absence analysis; our results are therefore in accordance with most gene sequence studies, providing strong, consilient molecular evidence from diverse independent datasets regarding the phylogenetic position of turtles.
-
micrornas support a turtle lizard clade
Biology Letters, 2012Co-Authors: Tyler R. Lyson, Jacques A Gauthier, Alysha M Heimberg, Benjamin L King, Erik A Sperling, Kevin J PetersonAbstract:Despite much interest in amniote systematics, the origin of turtles remains elusive. Traditional morphological phylogenetic analyses place turtles outside Diapsida—amniotes whose ancestor had two fenestrae in the temporal region of the skull (among the living forms the tuatara, lizards, birds and crocodilians)—and allied with some unfenestrate-skulled (anapsid) taxa. Nonetheless, some morphological analyses place turtles within Diapsida, allied with Lepidosauria (tuatara and lizards). Most molecular studies agree that turtles are diapsids, but rather than allying them with Lepidosaurs, instead place turtles near or within Archosauria (crocodilians and birds). Thus, three basic phylogenetic positions for turtles with respect to extant Diapsida are currently debated: (i) sister to Diapsida, (ii) sister to Lepidosauria, or (iii) sister to, or within, Archosauria. Interestingly, although these three alternatives are consistent with a single unrooted four-taxon tree for extant reptiles, they differ with respect to the position of the root. Here, we apply a novel molecular dataset, the presence versus absence of specific microRNAs, to the problem of the phylogenetic position of turtles and the root of the reptilian tree, and find that this dataset unambiguously supports a turtle + Lepidosaur group. We find that turtles and lizards share four unique miRNA gene families that are not found in any other organisms' genome or small RNA library, and no miRNAs are found in all diapsids but not turtles, or in turtles and archosaurs but not in lizards. The concordance between our result and some morphological analyses suggests that there have been numerous morphological convergences and reversals in reptile phylogeny, including the loss of temporal fenestrae.