The Experts below are selected from a list of 30 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Charan D - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
A MINIMALLY INVASIVE TECHNIQUE FOR EXTRACTION OF IMPACTED MANDIBULAR THIRD MOLAR WITH LuxatorS: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY
International journal of scientific research, 2018Co-Authors: M R Haranadha Reddy, Harish Kumar T.v.s, Santosh Kumar Vedati, Santosh Reddy G, Nadella Koteswara Rao, Charan DAbstract:Purpose: A new minimally technique was used for surgical extraction of mandibular third molar to minimize the intra and post operative complications associated with traditional technique (buccal guttering). Patients & Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted on 50 patients who required surgical removal of bilateral impacted mandibular third molar such as class I and Class II, Position A and position B according to Pell and Gregory Classification. Among them, one side was operated with new minimal invasive technique (Group A) and the other side by conventional technique (Group B) on the same visit under the local anesthesia. Baseline measurements were obtained preoperatively on either side before starting the procedure. Intraoperative complications such as hemorrhage, damage to adjacent vital structure, length of surgical time, and accessibility during the procedure and post operative complications such as pain, trismus, swelling, and dry socket on 1 st , 3 rd , 5 th and 7 th post operative day were evaluated. Result: A vast difference between the two groups in the study variables is noticed. There was a significant reduction in the operating time and hemorrhage intra-operatively and pain, swelling, trismus and dry socket post operatively in the Group A on post operative checkup (P
Chen Jian-jun - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Comparison between Minimally Invasive Extraction and Traditonal Extraction on Impacted Mandibular Molars
Chinese and Foreign Medical Research, 2013Co-Authors: Chen Jian-junAbstract:Objective:To observe the difference between minimally invasive extraction and traditonal extraction on impacted mandibular molars.Methods:120 cases of patients,which provided the main indication for extraction,were randomly divided into two groups.Impacted mandibular molars in minimally invasive extraction group were extracted with high speed turbine drill and Luxator,while teeth in traditional group were extracted with traditonal method with orthodox chisel. The fear rate,deformation of extraction wound and patient’s reaction after surgery(including the rate of pain and swelling) were compared between the two groups. Results:Fear rate,deformation of extraction wound and patient’s reaction after surgery(including the rate of pain and swelling) of minimally invasive extraction group was far less than that of traditonal extraction group,and the difference between two groups was statistically significant(P0.05).Conclusion:Minimally invasive extraction on impacted mandibular molars is superior to traditional method,which should be generalized in clinical application.
Hui-xia Zhang - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Comparison of minimally invasive extraction and traditional method in the extraction of impacted mandibular third molar
Shanghai journal of stomatology, 2016Co-Authors: Hui-xia ZhangAbstract:PURPOSE To compare minimally invasive extraction and traditional method in the extraction of impacted mandibular third molar. METHODS One hundred and sixty patients with impacted mandibular third molar were equally divided into two groups. Patients in the experimental group were treated with minimally invasive extraction, using implant machine and Luxator, while patients in the control group were treated with traditional methods including use of orthodox chisel. The operation time, intraoperative and postoperative complications including deformation of extraction sockets, dry socket, limitation of mouth opening, pain and swelling, and fear were observed and compared between the two groups. The data were analyzed with SPSS18.0 software package. RESULTS The operation time was (17.32±1.01) min in the experimental group, significantly shorter than the control group which was (33.46±1.12）min (P
Simon Jones - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Atraumatic extractions with Luxator Periotome
2012Co-Authors: Simon JonesAbstract:The extraction of a tooth is probably the most traumatic event a patient can experience in the dental office, and if the extraction doesn’t go smoothly, things can become quite stressful for the dentist as well. When the use of a simple surgical instrument can make the extraction process infinitely easier for both patient and dentist, I find it surprising not all den tists reach for a Directa Dental Luxator as their first instrument of choice. To understand how best to remove a tooth, it helps to appreciate the structures and forces that are holding the tooth in position. It is only by overcoming these forces that the tooth can be removed.
M R Haranadha Reddy - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
A MINIMALLY INVASIVE TECHNIQUE FOR EXTRACTION OF IMPACTED MANDIBULAR THIRD MOLAR WITH LuxatorS: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY
International journal of scientific research, 2018Co-Authors: M R Haranadha Reddy, Harish Kumar T.v.s, Santosh Kumar Vedati, Santosh Reddy G, Nadella Koteswara Rao, Charan DAbstract:Purpose: A new minimally technique was used for surgical extraction of mandibular third molar to minimize the intra and post operative complications associated with traditional technique (buccal guttering). Patients & Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted on 50 patients who required surgical removal of bilateral impacted mandibular third molar such as class I and Class II, Position A and position B according to Pell and Gregory Classification. Among them, one side was operated with new minimal invasive technique (Group A) and the other side by conventional technique (Group B) on the same visit under the local anesthesia. Baseline measurements were obtained preoperatively on either side before starting the procedure. Intraoperative complications such as hemorrhage, damage to adjacent vital structure, length of surgical time, and accessibility during the procedure and post operative complications such as pain, trismus, swelling, and dry socket on 1 st , 3 rd , 5 th and 7 th post operative day were evaluated. Result: A vast difference between the two groups in the study variables is noticed. There was a significant reduction in the operating time and hemorrhage intra-operatively and pain, swelling, trismus and dry socket post operatively in the Group A on post operative checkup (P
