The Experts below are selected from a list of 246 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Gregory C. Allen - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

Joseph R. Tobin - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Malignant Hyperthermia: human stress triggering.
    Biochimica et biophysica acta, 2011
    Co-Authors: Gerald A. Gronert, Joseph R. Tobin, Sheila M. Muldoon
    Abstract:

    Letter to the Editor concerns the question of a discussion of awake porcine Malignant Hyperthermia that erroneously omits the awake human stress reaction of Malignant Hyperthermia.

  • postoperative Malignant Hyperthermia an analysis of cases from the north american Malignant Hyperthermia registry
    Anesthesiology, 2008
    Co-Authors: Ronald S. Litman, Christopher Flood, Richard F Kaplan, Yung Ly Kim, Joseph R. Tobin
    Abstract:

    Background: The initial presentation of Malignant Hyperthermia (MH) may begin in the postoperative period. However, the maximal latency period between the end of anesthesia care and the onset of postoperative MH is unknown. The authors hypothesized that this latency period is short and is not manifested by Hyperthermia as the initial presenting sign. The authors sought to test this hypothesis and to describe the clinical characteristics of postoperative MH by analysis of suspected cases in the North American Malignant Hyperthermia Registry. Methods: Of 528 possible or suspected cases of MH in the North American Malignant Hyperthermia Registry, the authors identified 64 possible reports of postoperative MH. The records were reviewed in detail by the authors, each of whom assigned a qualitative score of "likely," "not likely," "not enough information available," or "not applicable" (where MH was not the final definitive diagnosis). Postoperative MH was confirmed after a consensus meeting of the three senior authors who reviewed in detail all possible "likely" cases. Results: The authors identified postoperative MH in 10 subjects. All received volatile agents and 5 also received succinylcholine. All demonstrated signs characteristic of acute MH, including generalized rigidity, hypercapnia and/or tachypnea, tachycardia, and Hyperthermia. No subject demonstrated Hyperthermia as the presenting sign. The latency period between the anesthesia finish time and the onset of a sign indicative of acute MH ranged from 0 to 40 min. Conclusions: Postoperative MH is uncommon, occurring in 10 of 528 suspected MH cases (1.9%) reported to the North American Malignant Hyperthermia Registry. Postoperative MH began shortly after completion of the anesthetic care. Hyperthermia was not a presenting sign of MH.

Barbara W. Brandom - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

Ronald S. Litman - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Malignant Hyperthermia Susceptibility and Related Diseases.
    Anesthesiology, 2018
    Co-Authors: Ronald S. Litman, Sarah M. Griggs, James J. Dowling, Sheila Riazi
    Abstract:

    This review identifies disease states associated with Malignant Hyperthermia susceptibility based on genotypic and phenotypic findings, and a framework is established for clinicians to identify a potentially Malignant Hyperthermia–susceptible patient.

  • postoperative Malignant Hyperthermia an analysis of cases from the north american Malignant Hyperthermia registry
    Anesthesiology, 2008
    Co-Authors: Ronald S. Litman, Christopher Flood, Richard F Kaplan, Yung Ly Kim, Joseph R. Tobin
    Abstract:

    Background: The initial presentation of Malignant Hyperthermia (MH) may begin in the postoperative period. However, the maximal latency period between the end of anesthesia care and the onset of postoperative MH is unknown. The authors hypothesized that this latency period is short and is not manifested by Hyperthermia as the initial presenting sign. The authors sought to test this hypothesis and to describe the clinical characteristics of postoperative MH by analysis of suspected cases in the North American Malignant Hyperthermia Registry. Methods: Of 528 possible or suspected cases of MH in the North American Malignant Hyperthermia Registry, the authors identified 64 possible reports of postoperative MH. The records were reviewed in detail by the authors, each of whom assigned a qualitative score of "likely," "not likely," "not enough information available," or "not applicable" (where MH was not the final definitive diagnosis). Postoperative MH was confirmed after a consensus meeting of the three senior authors who reviewed in detail all possible "likely" cases. Results: The authors identified postoperative MH in 10 subjects. All received volatile agents and 5 also received succinylcholine. All demonstrated signs characteristic of acute MH, including generalized rigidity, hypercapnia and/or tachypnea, tachycardia, and Hyperthermia. No subject demonstrated Hyperthermia as the presenting sign. The latency period between the anesthesia finish time and the onset of a sign indicative of acute MH ranged from 0 to 40 min. Conclusions: Postoperative MH is uncommon, occurring in 10 of 528 suspected MH cases (1.9%) reported to the North American Malignant Hyperthermia Registry. Postoperative MH began shortly after completion of the anesthetic care. Hyperthermia was not a presenting sign of MH.

Albert Urwyler - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Availability of dantrolene for the management of Malignant Hyperthermia crises: European Malignant Hyperthermia Group guidelines.
    British journal of anaesthesia, 2020
    Co-Authors: Klaus Peter Egede Glahn, Stephan Johannsen, Philip M. Hopkins, H. Rüffert, Thierry Girard, Diana Bendixen, Marc M J Snoeck, Albert Urwyler
    Abstract:

    Summary Faced with a Malignant Hyperthermia crisis, the immediate access to sufficient dantrolene is essential to achieve the best possible outcome for the patient. However, Malignant Hyperthermia crises are rare, and there may be administrative pressures to limit the amount of dantrolene stocked or, in some countries, not to stock dantrolene at all. There are no published guidelines to support anaesthetic departments in their effort to ensure availability of sufficient dantrolene for the management of Malignant Hyperthermia crises. After a literature review that confirmed a lack of clinical trials to inform this guideline, we undertook a formal consensus development process, in which 25 members of the European Malignant Hyperthermia Group participated. The consensus process used a modified web-based Delphi exercise, in which participants rated the appropriateness of statements that covered the dosing regimen for dantrolene in a Malignant Hyperthermia crisis, the types of facility that should stock dantrolene, and the amount of dantrolene that should be stocked. The resulting guidelines are based on available evidence and the opinions of international Malignant Hyperthermia experts representing a large group of Malignant Hyperthermia laboratories from around the world. Key recommendations include: the dosing regimen of dantrolene should be based on actual body weight, dantrolene should be available wherever volatile anaesthetics or succinylcholine are used, and 36 vials of dantrolene should be immediately available with a further 24 vials available within 1 h.

  • European Malignant Hyperthermia Group guidelines for investigation of Malignant Hyperthermia susceptibility
    British journal of anaesthesia, 2015
    Co-Authors: Philip M. Hopkins, Klaus Peter Egede Glahn, H. Rüffert, M. Snoeck, Thierry Girard, F.r. Ellis, Clemens R. Müller, Albert Urwyler
    Abstract:

    It is 30 yr since the British Journal of Anaesthesia published the first consensus protocol for the laboratory diagnosis of Malignant Hyperthermia susceptibility from the European Malignant Hyperthermia Group. This has subsequently been used in more than 10 000 individuals worldwide to inform use of anaesthetic drugs in these patients with increased risk of developing Malignant Hyperthermia during general anaesthesia, representing an early and successful example of stratified medicine. In 2001, our group also published a guideline for the use of DNA-based screening of Malignant Hyperthermia susceptibility. We now present an updated and complete guideline for the diagnostic pathway for patients potentially at increased risk of developing Malignant Hyperthermia. We introduce the new guideline with a narrative commentary that describes its development, the changes to previously published protocols and guidelines, and new sections, including recommendations for patient referral criteria and clinical interpretation of laboratory findings.

  • recognizing and managing a Malignant Hyperthermia crisis guidelines from the european Malignant Hyperthermia group
    BJA: British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2010
    Co-Authors: Klaus Peter Egede Glahn, F.r. Ellis, Clemens R. Müller, Albert Urwyler, Marc M J Snoeck, P J Halsall, F Wappler
    Abstract:

    Survival from a Malignant Hyperthermia (MH) crisis is highly dependent on early recognition and prompt action. MH crises are very rare and an increasing use of total i.v. anaesthesia is likely to make it even rarer, leading to the potential risk of reduced awareness of MH. In addition, dantrolene, the cornerstone of successful MH treatment, is unavailable in large areas around the world thereby increasing the risk of MH fatalities in these areas. The European Malignant Hyperthermia Group collected and reviewed all guidelines available from the various MH centres in order to provide a consensus document. The guidelines consist of two textboxes: Box 1 on recognizing MH and Box 2 on the treatment of an MH crisis.