The Experts below are selected from a list of 1503 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Michał Świetlicki - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Densitometry properties, macro- and microelements content in Tibiotarsus mid-diaphysis.
2018Co-Authors: Siemowit Muszyński, Ewa Tomaszewska, Piotr Dobrowolski, Małgorzata Kwiecień, Dariusz Wiącek, Izabela Świetlicka, Małgorzata Skibińska, Monika Szymańska-chargot, Jolanta Orzeł, Michał ŚwietlickiAbstract:Densitometry properties, macro- and microelements content in Tibiotarsus mid-diaphysis.
-
Geometric characteristics of Tibiotarsus of 42 days-old broiler chickens fed soybean meal (SBM) or chickpea seeds (CPS) as a primary protein source.
2018Co-Authors: Siemowit Muszyński, Ewa Tomaszewska, Piotr Dobrowolski, Małgorzata Kwiecień, Dariusz Wiącek, Izabela Świetlicka, Małgorzata Skibińska, Monika Szymańska-chargot, Jolanta Orzeł, Michał ŚwietlickiAbstract:Geometric characteristics of Tibiotarsus of 42 days-old broiler chickens fed soybean meal (SBM) or chickpea seeds (CPS) as a primary protein source.
-
Mechanical properties of Tibiotarsus mid-diaphysis of 42 days-old broiler chickens fed soybean meal (SBM) or chickpea seeds (CPS) as a primary protein source.
2018Co-Authors: Siemowit Muszyński, Ewa Tomaszewska, Piotr Dobrowolski, Małgorzata Kwiecień, Dariusz Wiącek, Izabela Świetlicka, Małgorzata Skibińska, Monika Szymańska-chargot, Jolanta Orzeł, Michał ŚwietlickiAbstract:Mechanical properties of Tibiotarsus mid-diaphysis of 42 days-old broiler chickens fed soybean meal (SBM) or chickpea seeds (CPS) as a primary protein source.
-
Representative light images of safranin O stained formaldehyde-fixed sections of Tibiotarsus articular cartilage of 42 days-old broiler chickens fed soybean meal (SBM) or chickpea seeds (CPS) as a primary protein source.
2018Co-Authors: Siemowit Muszyński, Ewa Tomaszewska, Piotr Dobrowolski, Małgorzata Kwiecień, Dariusz Wiącek, Izabela Świetlicka, Małgorzata Skibińska, Monika Szymańska-chargot, Jolanta Orzeł, Michał ŚwietlickiAbstract:Left: Vertical sections of Tibiotarsus articular cartilage. In both groups, the most intense staining pattern with safranin O indicating proteoglycans presence was observed in beginning of transitional zone, however, area of the highest proteoglycan concentration was wider in the SBM group. Right: Strong red color was tightly around isogenous groups of chondrocytes and nutritional ducts in pericellular matrix. All the scale bars represent 50 μm.
Erin L.r. Simons - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Microstructure and Cross-Sectional Shape of Limb Bones in Great Horned Owls and Red-Tailed Hawks: How Do These Features Relate to Differences in Flight and
2016Co-Authors: Hunting Behavior, Crystal A Marelli, Erin L.r. SimonsAbstract:The Red-tailed Hawk and Great Horned Owl are two species of raptor that are similar in body size, diet, and habitat. Both species use their hindlimbs during hunting, but differ in foot morphology, how they approach and immobilize prey, and the average size of prey captured. They also differ in primary flight style: the Red-tailed Hawk uses static soaring and the Great Horned Owl uses flap-gliding. The objectives of this study were to characterize the microstructure and cross-sectional shape of limb bones of these species and examine the relationship with flight and hunting behaviors. The mid-shaft of six limb bones from six individuals of each species was sampled. The degree of bone laminarity (proportion of circular primary vascular canals) and cross-sectional geometric parameters were calculated. In both species, the humerus and femur exhibited features that suggest high resistance to torsional loading, whereas the Tibiotarsus and phalanges had a shape more likely to resist compression and bending in a specific plane. The femur of the Red-tailed Hawk exhibited higher laminarity and larger polar moment of area than that of the Great Horned Owl. The Tibiotarsus was more elliptical than that of the Great Horned Owl. The hawk approaches prey from a more horizontal axis, takes prey of greater mass, and is more likely to pursue prey on the ground, which could potentially be causing more torsional loads on the femur and bending loads on the Tibiotarsus. In addition, differences in polar moment of area of the phalanges between the species could relate to differences in foot morphology or digit length. The humerus and ulna of the flap-gliding Great Horned Owl are mor
-
microstructure and cross sectional shape of limb bones in great horned owls and red tailed hawks how do these features relate to differences in flight and hunting behavior
PLOS ONE, 2014Co-Authors: Crystal A Marelli, Erin L.r. SimonsAbstract:The Red-tailed Hawk and Great Horned Owl are two species of raptor that are similar in body size, diet, and habitat. Both species use their hindlimbs during hunting, but differ in foot morphology, how they approach and immobilize prey, and the average size of prey captured. They also differ in primary flight style: the Red-tailed Hawk uses static soaring and the Great Horned Owl uses flap-gliding. The objectives of this study were to characterize the microstructure and cross-sectional shape of limb bones of these species and examine the relationship with flight and hunting behaviors. The mid-shaft of six limb bones from six individuals of each species was sampled. The degree of bone laminarity (proportion of circular primary vascular canals) and cross-sectional geometric parameters were calculated. In both species, the humerus and femur exhibited features that suggest high resistance to torsional loading, whereas the Tibiotarsus and phalanges had a shape more likely to resist compression and bending in a specific plane. The femur of the Red-tailed Hawk exhibited higher laminarity and larger polar moment of area than that of the Great Horned Owl. The Tibiotarsus was more elliptical than that of the Great Horned Owl. The hawk approaches prey from a more horizontal axis, takes prey of greater mass, and is more likely to pursue prey on the ground, which could potentially be causing more torsional loads on the femur and bending loads on the Tibiotarsus. In addition, differences in polar moment of area of the phalanges between the species could relate to differences in foot morphology or digit length. The humerus and ulna of the flap-gliding Great Horned Owl are more elliptical than the static soaring Red-tailed Hawk, a shape that may better resist the bending loads associated with a larger amount of flapping.
Kuznetsova Nataliya - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
FIGURES 41 – 47 in Remarkable diversity of the genus Endonura Cassagnau, 1979 (Collembola: Neanuridae: Neanurinae) in the Caucasus
2018Co-Authors: Smolis Adrian, Kuznetsova NataliyaAbstract:FIGURES 41 – 47. Endonura diminutichaeta sp. nov.: 41, chaetotaxy of labium; 42, chaetotaxy of labrum; 43, dorsal chaetotaxy of head and th. I (holotype); 44, dorsal chaetotaxy of ant. III – IV; 45, ventral chaetotaxy of ant. III – IV; 46, dorsal chaetotaxy of abd. II – VI (holotype); 47, Tibiotarsus and claw III, ventrolateral view
-
FIGURES 57 – 66 in Remarkable diversity of the genus Endonura Cassagnau, 1979 (Collembola: Neanuridae: Neanurinae) in the Caucasus
2018Co-Authors: Smolis Adrian, Kuznetsova NataliyaAbstract:FIGURES 57 – 66. Endonura ossetica sp. nov.: 57, dorsal chaetotaxy of head and th. I – II; 58, chaetotaxy of central area of head (holotype); 59, maxilla; 60, mandible; 61, chaetotaxy of labrum; 62, chaetotaxy of labium; 63, chaetotaxy of tubercles De of th. III and abd. I; 64, Tibiotarsus and claw III, dorsolateral view; 65, dorsal chaetotaxy of abd. IV – VI; 66, chaetotaxy of tubercle De of abd. III
-
FIGURES 34 – 39 in Remarkable diversity of the genus Endonura Cassagnau, 1979 (Collembola: Neanuridae: Neanurinae) in the Caucasus
2018Co-Authors: Smolis Adrian, Kuznetsova NataliyaAbstract:FIGURES 34 – 39. Endonura dobrolyubovae sp. nov.: 34, ventral chaetotaxy of abd. III – V (adult male); 35, Tibiotarsus and claw III, dorsolateral view; 36, claw III, lateral view; 37. chaetae of male ventral organ; 38, chaeta Di 1 of abd. V; 39, dorsal chaetotaxy of abd. IV – VI (holotype)
-
FIGURES 17 – 24 in Remarkable diversity of the genus Endonura Cassagnau, 1979 (Collembola: Neanuridae: Neanurinae) in the Caucasus
2018Co-Authors: Smolis Adrian, Kuznetsova NataliyaAbstract:FIGURES 17 – 24. Endonura aibgai sp. nov.: 17, dorsal chaetotaxy of head, th. I – III and abd. I (holotype); 18, dorsal chaetotaxy of ant. III – IV; 19, ventral chaetotaxy of ant. III – IV; 20, chaetotaxy of labrum; 21, chaeta Di 1 of abd. V; 22, dorsal chaetotaxy of abd. IV – VI; 23, femur, Tibiotarsus and claw III, ventrolateral view; 24, claw III, lateral view
-
FIGURES 7 – 16 in Remarkable diversity of the genus Endonura Cassagnau, 1979 (Collembola: Neanuridae: Neanurinae) in the Caucasus
2018Co-Authors: Smolis Adrian, Kuznetsova NataliyaAbstract:FIGURES 7 – 16. Endonura paracantabrica sp. nov.: 7, dorsal chaetotaxy of head, th. I – III and abd. I (holotype); 8, chaetotaxy of labrum; 9, ventral sclerifications of labrum; 10, mandible; 11, maxilla; 12, dorsal chaetotaxy of ant. III – IV; 13, ventral chaetotaxy of ant. III – IV; 14, chaeta Di 1 of abd. V; 15, dorsal chaetotaxy of abd. IV – VI; 16, Tibiotarsus and claw III, dorsolateral view
Siemowit Muszyński - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Densitometry properties, macro- and microelements content in Tibiotarsus mid-diaphysis.
2018Co-Authors: Siemowit Muszyński, Ewa Tomaszewska, Piotr Dobrowolski, Małgorzata Kwiecień, Dariusz Wiącek, Izabela Świetlicka, Małgorzata Skibińska, Monika Szymańska-chargot, Jolanta Orzeł, Michał ŚwietlickiAbstract:Densitometry properties, macro- and microelements content in Tibiotarsus mid-diaphysis.
-
Geometric characteristics of Tibiotarsus of 42 days-old broiler chickens fed soybean meal (SBM) or chickpea seeds (CPS) as a primary protein source.
2018Co-Authors: Siemowit Muszyński, Ewa Tomaszewska, Piotr Dobrowolski, Małgorzata Kwiecień, Dariusz Wiącek, Izabela Świetlicka, Małgorzata Skibińska, Monika Szymańska-chargot, Jolanta Orzeł, Michał ŚwietlickiAbstract:Geometric characteristics of Tibiotarsus of 42 days-old broiler chickens fed soybean meal (SBM) or chickpea seeds (CPS) as a primary protein source.
-
Mechanical properties of Tibiotarsus mid-diaphysis of 42 days-old broiler chickens fed soybean meal (SBM) or chickpea seeds (CPS) as a primary protein source.
2018Co-Authors: Siemowit Muszyński, Ewa Tomaszewska, Piotr Dobrowolski, Małgorzata Kwiecień, Dariusz Wiącek, Izabela Świetlicka, Małgorzata Skibińska, Monika Szymańska-chargot, Jolanta Orzeł, Michał ŚwietlickiAbstract:Mechanical properties of Tibiotarsus mid-diaphysis of 42 days-old broiler chickens fed soybean meal (SBM) or chickpea seeds (CPS) as a primary protein source.
-
Representative light images of safranin O stained formaldehyde-fixed sections of Tibiotarsus articular cartilage of 42 days-old broiler chickens fed soybean meal (SBM) or chickpea seeds (CPS) as a primary protein source.
2018Co-Authors: Siemowit Muszyński, Ewa Tomaszewska, Piotr Dobrowolski, Małgorzata Kwiecień, Dariusz Wiącek, Izabela Świetlicka, Małgorzata Skibińska, Monika Szymańska-chargot, Jolanta Orzeł, Michał ŚwietlickiAbstract:Left: Vertical sections of Tibiotarsus articular cartilage. In both groups, the most intense staining pattern with safranin O indicating proteoglycans presence was observed in beginning of transitional zone, however, area of the highest proteoglycan concentration was wider in the SBM group. Right: Strong red color was tightly around isogenous groups of chondrocytes and nutritional ducts in pericellular matrix. All the scale bars represent 50 μm.
Crystal A Marelli - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Microstructure and Cross-Sectional Shape of Limb Bones in Great Horned Owls and Red-Tailed Hawks: How Do These Features Relate to Differences in Flight and
2016Co-Authors: Hunting Behavior, Crystal A Marelli, Erin L.r. SimonsAbstract:The Red-tailed Hawk and Great Horned Owl are two species of raptor that are similar in body size, diet, and habitat. Both species use their hindlimbs during hunting, but differ in foot morphology, how they approach and immobilize prey, and the average size of prey captured. They also differ in primary flight style: the Red-tailed Hawk uses static soaring and the Great Horned Owl uses flap-gliding. The objectives of this study were to characterize the microstructure and cross-sectional shape of limb bones of these species and examine the relationship with flight and hunting behaviors. The mid-shaft of six limb bones from six individuals of each species was sampled. The degree of bone laminarity (proportion of circular primary vascular canals) and cross-sectional geometric parameters were calculated. In both species, the humerus and femur exhibited features that suggest high resistance to torsional loading, whereas the Tibiotarsus and phalanges had a shape more likely to resist compression and bending in a specific plane. The femur of the Red-tailed Hawk exhibited higher laminarity and larger polar moment of area than that of the Great Horned Owl. The Tibiotarsus was more elliptical than that of the Great Horned Owl. The hawk approaches prey from a more horizontal axis, takes prey of greater mass, and is more likely to pursue prey on the ground, which could potentially be causing more torsional loads on the femur and bending loads on the Tibiotarsus. In addition, differences in polar moment of area of the phalanges between the species could relate to differences in foot morphology or digit length. The humerus and ulna of the flap-gliding Great Horned Owl are mor
-
microstructure and cross sectional shape of limb bones in great horned owls and red tailed hawks how do these features relate to differences in flight and hunting behavior
PLOS ONE, 2014Co-Authors: Crystal A Marelli, Erin L.r. SimonsAbstract:The Red-tailed Hawk and Great Horned Owl are two species of raptor that are similar in body size, diet, and habitat. Both species use their hindlimbs during hunting, but differ in foot morphology, how they approach and immobilize prey, and the average size of prey captured. They also differ in primary flight style: the Red-tailed Hawk uses static soaring and the Great Horned Owl uses flap-gliding. The objectives of this study were to characterize the microstructure and cross-sectional shape of limb bones of these species and examine the relationship with flight and hunting behaviors. The mid-shaft of six limb bones from six individuals of each species was sampled. The degree of bone laminarity (proportion of circular primary vascular canals) and cross-sectional geometric parameters were calculated. In both species, the humerus and femur exhibited features that suggest high resistance to torsional loading, whereas the Tibiotarsus and phalanges had a shape more likely to resist compression and bending in a specific plane. The femur of the Red-tailed Hawk exhibited higher laminarity and larger polar moment of area than that of the Great Horned Owl. The Tibiotarsus was more elliptical than that of the Great Horned Owl. The hawk approaches prey from a more horizontal axis, takes prey of greater mass, and is more likely to pursue prey on the ground, which could potentially be causing more torsional loads on the femur and bending loads on the Tibiotarsus. In addition, differences in polar moment of area of the phalanges between the species could relate to differences in foot morphology or digit length. The humerus and ulna of the flap-gliding Great Horned Owl are more elliptical than the static soaring Red-tailed Hawk, a shape that may better resist the bending loads associated with a larger amount of flapping.
