The Experts below are selected from a list of 6888 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Nadia Badawi - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
a comparison of the performance of healthy australian 3 year olds with the standardised norms of the bayley scales of infant and Toddler Development version iii
Archives of Disease in Childhood, 2014Co-Authors: Shriniwas Chinta, Karen Walker, Robert Halliday, Nadia Badawi, Alison LoughranfowldsAbstract:Background Standardised Developmental tests are now widely used in neuroDevelopmental assessments of infants and children. In 2006, the revised and updated version of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (version III) replaced the previous version and is now widely used in neonatal Developmental follow-up clinics. Several papers from Australia have highlighted underestimation of Developmental impairment up to age 2 using this revised version. We aimed to ascertain how a cohort of healthy 3-year-old children performed compared to the standardised norms of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (version-III). Method Term healthy newborn control infants from the prospective Development after Infant Surgery (DAISy) study were included. At 3 years of age, the mean scores on each of the five subscales for 156 children were compared with the standardised norms. Results At 3 years of age, the mean scores were higher than the standardised norms on four of the subscales, cognition ( Conclusions Healthy term Australian children have a statistically significantly higher mean score on the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (version-III) compared with the standardised means in four of the subtests, with the greatest difference in receptive language. This has implications for the assessment of children as the test may miss those with a minor delay and not reflect the severity of delay of infants that it does identify. We recommend that consideration ought to be given to re-standardising this assessment on Australian children.
-
Brief Report: Performance of Australian Children at One Year of Age on the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Version III)
The Australian Educational and Developmental Psychologist, 2010Co-Authors: Karen Walker, Robert Halliday, Nadia Badawi, Sharon LaingAbstract:This article reports mean scores on the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Version III) for 211 randomly selected healthy term (>37 weeks gestation) Australian infants at one year of age. Mean scores were significantly different from standardised norms in all subscales except fine motor. Australian infants scored higher on cognitive and receptive language (p < .01) and lower on expressive language and gross motor (ps < .01) subscales. These findings raise questions regarding the validity of this test in the Australian population and suggest that the test be re-normed on Australian children for valid interpretation of scores in this cultural context.
-
454 Australian Children's Performance at One Year of Age Using the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Version III)
Pediatric Research, 2010Co-Authors: Karen Walker, Robert Halliday, Sharon Laing, Nadia BadawiAbstract:454 Australian Children's Performance at One Year of Age Using the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Version III)
Nam Hun Heo - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
The Predictive Value of Language Scales: Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development Third Edition in Correlation With Korean Sequenced Language Scale for Infant.
Annals of rehabilitation medicine, 2020Co-Authors: Joung Hyun Doh, Soo A Kim, Yuntae Kim, Nodam Park, Siha Park, Nam Hun HeoAbstract:OBJECTIVE To compare the relationship of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development 3rd Edition (K-BSID-III) language score and the Sequenced Language Scale for Infant (SELSI) score and evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of K-BSID-III language score and optimal cutoff value with receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis in infants and Toddlers with delayed language Development. METHODS A total of 104 children with suspected language Developmental delay were included in this retrospective study. Subjects were tested using the K-BSID-III and SELSI and subdivided into several groups according to the severity of language scores. ROC curve analysis was performed to assess K-BSID-III for delayed language Development. RESULTS Receptive and expressive language subscales of the K-BSID-III showed markedly significant correlation with the SELSI scores (p
-
the predictive value of language scales bayley scales of infant and Toddler Development third edition in correlation with korean sequenced language scale for infant
Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine, 2020Co-Authors: Joung Hyun Doh, Soo A Kim, Yuntae Kim, Nodam Park, Siha Park, Nam Hun HeoAbstract:OBJECTIVE To compare the relationship of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development 3rd Edition (K-BSID-III) language score and the Sequenced Language Scale for Infant (SELSI) score and evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of K-BSID-III language score and optimal cutoff value with receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis in infants and Toddlers with delayed language Development. METHODS A total of 104 children with suspected language Developmental delay were included in this retrospective study. Subjects were tested using the K-BSID-III and SELSI and subdivided into several groups according to the severity of language scores. ROC curve analysis was performed to assess K-BSID-III for delayed language Development. RESULTS Receptive and expressive language subscales of the K-BSID-III showed markedly significant correlation with the SELSI scores (p<0.001). ROC analysis showed an area under the curve of 0.877 (p<0.001) in SELSI receptive score and 0.935 (p<0.001) in SELSI expressive score. The optimal cutoff value where sensitivity of 85% and specificity of 81% were achieved with the K-BSID-III receptive score was 1.50 (between average and low average) in the SELSI receptive score. The optimal cutoff value where sensitivity of 96% and specificity of 82% were achieved with the K-BSID-III expressive score was also 1.50 in the SELSI expressive score. CONCLUSION In this study, the correlations between K-BSID-III and SELSI language scores were statistically significant. However, the interpretation should be considered carefully in low average group due to tendency of underestimation of delayed language Development.
Karen Walker - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Early Life Parechovirus Infection NeuroDevelopmental Outcomes at 3 Years: A Cohort Study.
The Journal of pediatrics, 2020Co-Authors: Philip N Britton, Karen Walker, Brendan Mcmullan, Claire Galea, Rebecca Burrell, Bronte G. Morgan, Ingrid Honan, Suzy Teutsch, Hayley Smithers-sheedy, Natalie FairbairnAbstract:Objective To investigate the long-term Developmental and behavioral outcomes in an established cohort of children hospitalized as infants with human parechovirus (HPeV) infection and sepsis-like illness. Study design The HPeV cohort was composed of children 3 years of age after HPeV infection and hospitalization in early infancy that occurred during a well-documented HPeV genotype 3 outbreak in Australia. We assessed neuroDevelopmental and behavioral outcomes using the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development-III and the Child Behavior Checklist. We compared their outcomes with a subsample of healthy control infants drawn from the independently sampled Triple B Pregnancy Cohort Study. Results Fifty children, with a mean age of 41 months, were followed for 3 years after hospital admission with HPeV infection. There were 47 children whose original illness was fever without source or sepsis-like illness and 3 who had encephalitis. All children in the HPeV cohort showed age-specific Development within the population normal range on the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development-III. There was no difference in Developmental attainment compared with 107 healthy control infants after adjusting for measured confounders. The HPeV cohort showed higher average scores on the Child Behavior Checklist and a higher frequency of clinical range scores compared with healthy controls. Conclusions Although HPeV sepsis-like illness did not result in neuroDevelopmental delay at 3 years of age, it was associated with increased behavioral problems compared with healthy controls. The behavioral problems reached a clinical threshold in a minority of children. Results inform clinical management and planning for children after severe HPeV infection in infancy.
-
a comparison of the performance of healthy australian 3 year olds with the standardised norms of the bayley scales of infant and Toddler Development version iii
Archives of Disease in Childhood, 2014Co-Authors: Shriniwas Chinta, Karen Walker, Robert Halliday, Nadia Badawi, Alison LoughranfowldsAbstract:Background Standardised Developmental tests are now widely used in neuroDevelopmental assessments of infants and children. In 2006, the revised and updated version of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (version III) replaced the previous version and is now widely used in neonatal Developmental follow-up clinics. Several papers from Australia have highlighted underestimation of Developmental impairment up to age 2 using this revised version. We aimed to ascertain how a cohort of healthy 3-year-old children performed compared to the standardised norms of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (version-III). Method Term healthy newborn control infants from the prospective Development after Infant Surgery (DAISy) study were included. At 3 years of age, the mean scores on each of the five subscales for 156 children were compared with the standardised norms. Results At 3 years of age, the mean scores were higher than the standardised norms on four of the subscales, cognition ( Conclusions Healthy term Australian children have a statistically significantly higher mean score on the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (version-III) compared with the standardised means in four of the subtests, with the greatest difference in receptive language. This has implications for the assessment of children as the test may miss those with a minor delay and not reflect the severity of delay of infants that it does identify. We recommend that consideration ought to be given to re-standardising this assessment on Australian children.
-
Brief Report: Performance of Australian Children at One Year of Age on the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Version III)
The Australian Educational and Developmental Psychologist, 2010Co-Authors: Karen Walker, Robert Halliday, Nadia Badawi, Sharon LaingAbstract:This article reports mean scores on the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Version III) for 211 randomly selected healthy term (>37 weeks gestation) Australian infants at one year of age. Mean scores were significantly different from standardised norms in all subscales except fine motor. Australian infants scored higher on cognitive and receptive language (p < .01) and lower on expressive language and gross motor (ps < .01) subscales. These findings raise questions regarding the validity of this test in the Australian population and suggest that the test be re-normed on Australian children for valid interpretation of scores in this cultural context.
-
454 Australian Children's Performance at One Year of Age Using the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Version III)
Pediatric Research, 2010Co-Authors: Karen Walker, Robert Halliday, Sharon Laing, Nadia BadawiAbstract:454 Australian Children's Performance at One Year of Age Using the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Version III)
Wu-shiun Hsieh - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
A psychometric study of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development - 3rd Edition for term and preterm Taiwanese infants
Research in developmental disabilities, 2013Co-Authors: Wu-shiun Hsieh, Chyong-hsin Hsu, Li-chiou Chen, Wang-tso Lee, Nan-chang Chiu, Suh-fang JengAbstract:Abstract The Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development – 3rd Edition (Bayley-III) was updated to enhance its usefulness for contemporary child Developmental assessment. However, recent data in Western countries have implicated the overestimation of child Development by the new instrument. This study aimed to investigate the psychometric features of the Bayley-III for term and preterm infants in Taiwan. Forty-seven term infants and 167 preterm infants were prospectively examined with the Bayley Scales of Infant Development – 2nd Edition (BSID-II) and the Bayley-III at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months of age (corrected for prematurity). The psychometric properties examined included reliability, construct validity, and known-group validity. The intra- and inter-rater reliabilities of the Bayley-III were good to excellent. The correlations between the BSID-II and Bayley-III raw scores were good to excellent for the cognitive and motor items and low to excellent for the language items. Term infants achieved higher composite scores than preterm infants on all of the Bayley-III scales (p
-
Relationship of Neonatal Cerebral Blood Flow Velocity Asymmetry with Early Motor, Cognitive and Language Development in Term Infants
Ultrasound in medicine & biology, 2013Co-Authors: Wu-shiun Hsieh, Chyong-hsin Hsu, Nan-chang Chiu, Hung-chieh Chou, Chien-yi Chen, Shinn-forng Peng, Han-yang Hung, Jui-hsing Chang, Wei J. ChenAbstract:Abstract The objective of this study was to examine the relationships of Doppler cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFV) asymmetry measures with Developmental outcomes in term infants. Doppler CBFV parameters (peak systolic velocity [PSV] and mean velocity [MV]) of the bilateral middle cerebral arteries of 52 healthy term infants were prospectively examined on postnatal days 1–5, and then their motor, cognitive and language Development was evaluated with the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition, at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months of age. The left CBFV asymmetry measure (PSV or MV) was calculated by subtracting the right-side value from the left-side value. Left CBFV asymmetry measures were significantly positively related to motor scores at 6 (r = 0.3–0.32, p
Joung Hyun Doh - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
The Predictive Value of Language Scales: Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development Third Edition in Correlation With Korean Sequenced Language Scale for Infant.
Annals of rehabilitation medicine, 2020Co-Authors: Joung Hyun Doh, Soo A Kim, Yuntae Kim, Nodam Park, Siha Park, Nam Hun HeoAbstract:OBJECTIVE To compare the relationship of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development 3rd Edition (K-BSID-III) language score and the Sequenced Language Scale for Infant (SELSI) score and evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of K-BSID-III language score and optimal cutoff value with receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis in infants and Toddlers with delayed language Development. METHODS A total of 104 children with suspected language Developmental delay were included in this retrospective study. Subjects were tested using the K-BSID-III and SELSI and subdivided into several groups according to the severity of language scores. ROC curve analysis was performed to assess K-BSID-III for delayed language Development. RESULTS Receptive and expressive language subscales of the K-BSID-III showed markedly significant correlation with the SELSI scores (p
-
the predictive value of language scales bayley scales of infant and Toddler Development third edition in correlation with korean sequenced language scale for infant
Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine, 2020Co-Authors: Joung Hyun Doh, Soo A Kim, Yuntae Kim, Nodam Park, Siha Park, Nam Hun HeoAbstract:OBJECTIVE To compare the relationship of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development 3rd Edition (K-BSID-III) language score and the Sequenced Language Scale for Infant (SELSI) score and evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of K-BSID-III language score and optimal cutoff value with receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis in infants and Toddlers with delayed language Development. METHODS A total of 104 children with suspected language Developmental delay were included in this retrospective study. Subjects were tested using the K-BSID-III and SELSI and subdivided into several groups according to the severity of language scores. ROC curve analysis was performed to assess K-BSID-III for delayed language Development. RESULTS Receptive and expressive language subscales of the K-BSID-III showed markedly significant correlation with the SELSI scores (p<0.001). ROC analysis showed an area under the curve of 0.877 (p<0.001) in SELSI receptive score and 0.935 (p<0.001) in SELSI expressive score. The optimal cutoff value where sensitivity of 85% and specificity of 81% were achieved with the K-BSID-III receptive score was 1.50 (between average and low average) in the SELSI receptive score. The optimal cutoff value where sensitivity of 96% and specificity of 82% were achieved with the K-BSID-III expressive score was also 1.50 in the SELSI expressive score. CONCLUSION In this study, the correlations between K-BSID-III and SELSI language scores were statistically significant. However, the interpretation should be considered carefully in low average group due to tendency of underestimation of delayed language Development.
