Universal Declaration

14,000,000 Leading Edge Experts on the ideXlab platform

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

The Experts below are selected from a list of 13830 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Mary Robinson - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • cultural rights in international law article 27 of the Universal Declaration of human rights and beyond
    2007
    Co-Authors: Elsa Stamatopoulou, Mary Robinson
    Abstract:

    INTRODUCTION: I. LEGAL HISTORY AND CONTEMPORARY CONTEXT A. The drafting history of Article 27 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and of Article 15 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights Article 27 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights Article 15 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights B. Culture, cultural relativism, identity politics C. The World Conference Against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and related Intolerance D. Dialogue Among Civilizations II. THE RIGHT TO PARTICIPATE IN CULTURAL LIFE IN INTERNATIONAL INSTRUMENTS AND PRACTICE A. International instruments B. Role of the United Nations human rights treaty bodies with respect to the right to participate in cultural life C. Role of United Nations bodies other than the human rights treaty bodies D. Role of the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights E. Role of the United Nations Education, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) F. Cultural rights and United Nations operations III. WHAT ARE CULTURAL RIGHTS? NORMATIVE CONTENT OF THE RIGHT TO PARTICIPATE IN CULTURAL LIFE A. The context and concept of culture B. The fundamental nature of cultural rights: not every rite is a right C. The elements of the right to participate in cultural life D. State obligations and violations E. Monitoring cultural rights: indicators and benchmarks F. Justiciable aspects of cultural rights IV SPECIAL GROUPS A. Indigenous Peoples and Minorities: what are their cultural rights? B. Other Groups CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS APPENDICES SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY INDEX.

  • the Universal Declaration of human rights hope and history
    Health and Human Rights, 1998
    Co-Authors: Mary Robinson
    Abstract:

    N ineteen ninety-eight is an important year; it is a year when we mark the fiftieth anniversary of the adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and also an important year for the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. It is a year when we reaffirm our commitment to work for change and to demonstrate that the principles of the UN Charter and the Universal Declaration are not too theoretical, nor too abstract. It is also a time to recognize the importance of the Universal Declaration for health issues globally. If we strive to give such principles practical effect, the success of our efforts can be measured by the improved health and well-being of individuals around the world. The Universal Declaration was the first international agreement aimed at the improvement of human rights for all people. The year 1948 was, of course, "no ordinary time." The devastation of World War II and the revelations at Nuremberg made nations more willing to commit to a Universal standard of human rights protections. today, when we have become concerned about a lack of individual and collective will, it is worth remembering that not only after that war, but throughout, dedicated groups and individuals around the world worked tirelessly for the human rights of ordinary men and women. This can serve as a reminder that no matter how hard the going gets, we must not sacrifice human rights for other goals. The Universal Declaration is a document that owes much to the vision of Eleanor Roosevelt, one of those wartime champions of human rights. She was the US representative to the UN Commission on Human Rights and later its

  • The Universal Declaration of Human Rights: Hope and History.
    Health and human rights, 1998
    Co-Authors: Mary Robinson
    Abstract:

    N ineteen ninety-eight is an important year; it is a year when we mark the fiftieth anniversary of the adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and also an important year for the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. It is a year when we reaffirm our commitment to work for change and to demonstrate that the principles of the UN Charter and the Universal Declaration are not too theoretical, nor too abstract. It is also a time to recognize the importance of the Universal Declaration for health issues globally. If we strive to give such principles practical effect, the success of our efforts can be measured by the improved health and well-being of individuals around the world. The Universal Declaration was the first international agreement aimed at the improvement of human rights for all people. The year 1948 was, of course, "no ordinary time." The devastation of World War II and the revelations at Nuremberg made nations more willing to commit to a Universal standard of human rights protections. today, when we have become concerned about a lack of individual and collective will, it is worth remembering that not only after that war, but throughout, dedicated groups and individuals around the world worked tirelessly for the human rights of ordinary men and women. This can serve as a reminder that no matter how hard the going gets, we must not sacrifice human rights for other goals. The Universal Declaration is a document that owes much to the vision of Eleanor Roosevelt, one of those wartime champions of human rights. She was the US representative to the UN Commission on Human Rights and later its

William A. Schabas - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • John Peters Humphrey (1905–1995): The man behind the first draft of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
    2019
    Co-Authors: William A. Schabas
    Abstract:

    John Peters Humphrey prepared the first draft of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. He was Secretary to the United Nations Commission on Human Rights This chapter describes Humphrey's role in the preparation of the draft and his influence on the final text of the Declaration.

  • the Universal Declaration of human rights the travaux preparatoires
    2013
    Co-Authors: William A. Schabas
    Abstract:

    A collection of United Nations documents associated with the drafting of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, these volumes facilitate research into the scope of, meaning of and intent behind the instrument's provisions. It permits an examination of the various drafts of what became the thirty articles of the Declaration, including one of the earliest documents – a compilation of human rights provisions from national constitutions, organised thematically. The documents are organised chronologically and thorough thematic indexing facilitates research into the origins of specific rights and norms. It is also annotated in order to provide information relating to names, places, events and concepts that might have been familiar in the late 1940s but are today more obscure.

  • The Universal Declaration of Human Rights: The Travaux Préparatoires - The Universal Declaration of Human Rights: the Travaux Préparatoires
    2013
    Co-Authors: William A. Schabas
    Abstract:

    A collection of United Nations documents associated with the drafting of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, these volumes facilitate research into the scope of, meaning of and intent behind the instrument's provisions. It permits an examination of the various drafts of what became the thirty articles of the Declaration, including one of the earliest documents – a compilation of human rights provisions from national constitutions, organised thematically. The documents are organised chronologically and thorough thematic indexing facilitates research into the origins of specific rights and norms. It is also annotated in order to provide information relating to names, places, events and concepts that might have been familiar in the late 1940s but are today more obscure.

  • the abolition of the death penalty in international law the Universal Declaration of human rights and recognition of the right to life
    2002
    Co-Authors: William A. Schabas
    Abstract:

    The cornerstone of contemporary human rights law is the Universal Declaration of Human Rights , adopted by the General Assembly of the United Nations on 10 December 1948. The Universal Declaration was complemented, some eighteen years later, by three international treaties, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights , the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights , and the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. A Second Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights Aiming at the Abolition of the Death Penalty was adopted by the United Nations General Assembly in December 1989, and came into force on 11 July 1991. Collectively, the five instruments comprise what is termed the ‘International Bill of Rights’. Although the Universal Declaration is not a binding treaty, it has played a seminal role not only in the United Nations system but also in the regional systems for the protection of human rights. The Universal Declaration is often cited, at least in part, as a statement or codification of customary international law, or as an authoritative interpretation of the human rights clauses in the Charter of the United Nations. According to the International Court of Justice, ‘General Assembly resolutions, even if they are not binding, may sometimes have normative value. They can, in certain circumstances, provide evidence important for establishing the existence of a rule or the emergence of an opinio juris .

Kjersti Brathagen - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

Emma Stone Mackinnon - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

Steven G. Kellman - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • OMNILINGUAL ASPIRATIONS: THE CASE OF THE Universal Declaration OF HUMAN RIGHTS
    2016
    Co-Authors: Steven G. Kellman
    Abstract:

    In this essay, Kellman analyzes the linguistic particularities of the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which bears equal force of law in each of its 466 distinct linguistic iterations, and which its composers hoped would become the Magna Carta of the modern era. This unique historical occurrence allows Kellman to explore the “theology of international governance” as it is transmitted through principles of linguistic equivalence. The essay further brings the insights derived from its analyses to bear on other historical instances of political translatability, including the 1889 Treaty of Friendship and Commerce between Italy and Ethiopia and the United Nations Security Council Resolution 242 on the withdrawal of Israeli troops from Palestine.

  • Omnilingual Aspirations: The Case of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
    Polylinguality and Transcultural Practices, 1
    Co-Authors: Steven G. Kellman
    Abstract:

    Adopted by the United Nations in 1948, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights is, according to the Guinness Book of World Records, the most widely translated document. However, versions in 419 languages are not conceived as translations but equivalences, alternate embodiments of identical tenets. The Bible has been rendered into numerous languages, but the Hebrew and Greek originals possess authority that English, Bengali, and Xhosa derivatives do not. The Bible is translated, but the UDHR is, through the theology of international governance, transubstantiated into multiple tongues. No version has priority; each is equally valid, transparent, and interchangeable. The utopian premise is not only that all humans possess inalienable rights but also that all languages express the same principles. The document’s title, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, might seem a solecism, a misplaced modifier. Surely, it is human rights that are Universal, not the Declaration. However, the UN insists that all versions (at least in the original official languages) are equally binding. It rejects Whorfian notions that particular languages enable particular thoughts and embraces languages as neutral tools whose specific manifestation is irrelevant. Arguments against imprisoning writers in Burma could appeal equally to the authority of either the Universal Declaration of Human Rights or la Déclaration universelle des droits de l’homme or Всеобщую декларацию прав человека or la Declaración Universal de Derechos Humanos or 世界人权宣言. Rather than the Babelian myth of an Ur-Sprache before hubris scattered us into mutual unintelligibility, the UDHR endorses a Chomskyan belief that all languages can express the same thoughts. Yet differences among versions of Article 1 (“All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights”) are not trivial; dignity is incommensurable with Würde, αξιοπρέπεια, dignidade, waardigheid, or достоинства. The UDHR is a translingual text shaped by the languages of framers and translators.